aspergers_patrick wrote:
Many of the top Scientists of the 21st century didn't have Autism.
This is the 21st century. I would think most of the top scientists of the 21st century would still be the top scientists of the 21st century. The ones that do have autistic traits simply may not want it to be known, while clearly there are some that do make it known, such as Temple Grandin, who is considered a top scientist in her field.
The scientists from the past that are believed to have been autistic are few in numbers compared to the number of actual scientists that existed during their times, but then so are those that could have been considered top scientists. I have several relatives that are scientists and they tend to show some Aspie traits and although a couple of them are considered the top in their field, they are not considered to be amoung the top in the overall collective scheme of scientists worldwide (as far as I know) - there are just WAY TOO MANY 21st century scientists to simply single out who belongs at the top. Top scientists from the past are considered "top" because of the remarkable contributions they made that have had an impact on the lives of the majority of upright walking intelligent and semi-intelligent creatures that inhabit this planet. Many of the contributions of modern science has yet to make a historical impact.
_________________
The Rhymin' Red Rover, that's what they call me,
Too old for a sailin', too young fo' the sea;
Set sail fo' a sunset, to a land that is free,
I'm the Rhymin' Red Rover, and that's where I'll be.