HistoryGal wrote:
Sociopaths lack a conscience. We are easy bait for them.
Can you elaborate? Is it as simple as being solely because we have issues with understanding social situations? My observations is that a target can be chosen
without them having said
anything. Just being in same room, basically the first impression so according to some sources as little as 7 seconds. I feel it is a bit longer(although could be due to having Aspergers) like 1-2 minutes or maybe longer in cases where your presence isn't expressly for the purpose of meeting this individual like an interview but rather simply sharing a room with several other people which could be scenarios such as first day at work on a new job, first day at college, moving into new apartment, starting a membership at a weight-room/gym/club/etc.
I would theorize that there is something else perhaps a propensity for psychological pain.
Summer_Twilight wrote:
Why else would they go to the trouble to hurt others? They want to make themselves feel better. Perhaps they want to hurt anyone in the "Aspie and Autistic" community because they think we are gullible so they can put themselves up.
I've understood this in typical bullies but how would causing permanent life consequences up to and including death make them feel better about themselves? Do they keep "score" of those who had been "bullied to death"?
In general I would think that the easiest group to do this to would be the most vulnerable members of society which IMO would include: People with severe addictions to heavy narcotics such as opiates/Meth/Cocaine/Heroin/etc tend to have unstable psyches and have an obviously increased level of risk for psychosis, crime or suicide. Especially those who are homeless and furthermore in these cases it is far less likely that their actions will face recourse. The proverbial "fish in a barrel" would be someone who is both homeless and severely addicted to drugs, both qualities are also indicative of a higher probability of suffering from a mental illness when compared either to those without any addictions those with a stable home. If the criteria is social deficiency = not a human being in their eyes then there are also others who fulfill this criteria and who would be easier to target as well as avoid punishment.
If this is their modus operandi:
1. Identify a suitable target.
2. Carry out a schema of manipulation, disinformation, gaslighting, general abuse, general bullying tactics against the target.
3. Result: Death of target by suicide or violent crime; alternative result being life or
very long term imprisonment. (RIP or "25 to Life")
4. Feeling of achieving one's complete Self/perfect Self/Zen/Nirvana/etc.
I would then conclude that, logically, the most efficient selection method would be choosing addicts and/or homeless people. Efficiency in this case referring to their perverse sense of justice.
_________________
My account is often forced to do Captchas so I may be slow to reply or perhaps even unable to reply.