How come some aspies have friends and others can't make any
Boo: It's not that nobody thought anything was "wrong" until I researched Aspergers. Everyone I've ever known has told me I was weird and somethign was wrong with me, and if I told them about the problems I had they had no idea what I was talking about... we couldn't relate. Even my "friends" couldn't... people who liked me would "tolerate" my behavior (for a while), but they misenterpretted it. I knew I was different (whether or not I thought something was "wrong" depended on how positive I was feeling about myself, which was usually not very, but I knew that something was differenet in that I couldn't get or figure out the things that other people seemed to be able to grasp about interaction, and when I figured out how to do some things manually that were like some great discovery, it was somethign other people did without even thinking about).
While my parents initially insisted I didn't have Asperger's (without knowing anything about it) when I first mentioned it, I hardly think this is any kind of indicator. Their immediate response to me saying somethign was wrong with me was to insist it was all in my head. I had the same response to both severe allergies and asthma growing up, which I didn't get any kind of treatment for until I was 12. Anything "wrong' could be overcome by willpower, or was some sort of self indulgence (as you seem to view Aspergers). This didn't prevent them from observing and complaining about numerous things that were "wrong" with me in terms of how I acted and treated other people, a frequent interpretation being that I didn't care about other people at all (I did) or was intentionally trying to be rude or drive people away (I wasn't). Since I did not go to school prior to college there wasn't any report given to my parents about this either, not that they probably would have believed it if it had been the case.
Since it wasn't related to the topic of the post, I didn't feel the need to list all the various things that set me apart growing up or were explained by Asperger's, though I've occasionally mentioned in other posts. I also don't feel the need to prove I am more or less "aspie" than anybody else... would you feel the need to do this with any other condition? Diabetes? Depression? Schizophrenia? Likewise I don't feel the need to get "certified" by a psychiatrist.
Most psychiatric and mental conditions are by definition not something you can just prove with a test. They are loosely grouped together based on observed characteristics or the patient's own responses and the doctor's interpretation. If you think about it, a large amount of conditions you would probably deem legitimate are diagnosed without a medical test as well. I go to the doctor for a rash, they give me a cream, it goes away. They don't sample my skin and put it under a microscope. Most of the times I've gone to the doctor and received treatment they didn't do some kind of test, they just observed and asked questions and identified it based on their knowledge of similar things. Obviously there are other conditions which required more stringent tests, especially because certain medicines might be harmful if you don't have the condition, or interact with other conditions or drugs... but it's not quite as cut and dried as you make it out.
Plus, while they are still making medical advances all the time, almost every week I read something new that they have linked to such-and-such gene or test that they didn't have that association before. Evidence points to the fact that Asperger's is linked to genetics as it seems to run in families. There has also been some evidence linking Austism in general to genetics, I was just reading about further discoveries in this in the past week. Just becuase they can see some physical changes though doesn't mean they can diagnose it that way... they're only scratching the surface. It was only comparatively recently that they discovered physical evidence of Alzheimer's in the brain, and that's not even fully proven. But it would be folly to have claimed beforehand that since there was no physical test, the condition did not exist. Know what you know and know what you don't know. There is still more that we don't know about medical science and the human body than we do know, and just becuase you don't know how something works doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
Boo: I sure hope you revise this opinion of yours often. It doesn't seem very sound at all.
Reasons being:
AS is related to Autism. I know that I for one have always related more in thoughts and feelings to autistic people. It is how I suspected I had asperger's. Think about that for a moment. I, the relatively normal looking person, relates more to the person who sits rocking and babbling than, say, the supermarket clerk who says hello to me. Professionals are aware that AS is related to Autism. This concept of yours only works if you ignore that correlation, imo, as that link is quite significant.
If you are unable to comprehend the pattern between the two, and how meaningful that pattern is, I would suggest that perhaps you don't have AS. Being unable to follow a pattern beyond a couple or even just one step is a tell tale characteristic of a normal brain, to me. Neurotypical people are very much confined to the information immediately available to them.
Suggesting that SaNcheNuSS has avoidant personality disorder, while a justified question to ask oneself, most certainly reeks of poor investigation. Have you ever actually compared people with disorders like these to people with asperger's? There is a reason that one of the phrases used in psychology is "to rule out". Asperger's is something, like Schizophrenia, which needs to be ruled out so one can discover the more apt term for one's difference. I know NT people who would definitely rule out AS, but show signs of, or know that they have other disorders.
Like I know a NT with OCD. She's able to talk to people, without missing a beat, as those NT people do, but she also talks obsessively sometimes, and she engages in many repeated tasks. She keeps an obsessively clean home. She's able to look people in the eye, and have close relationships. She enjoys motherhood. Besides her OCD she is quite normal.
I know an NT with PTSD. She has symptoms which superficially seem very similar to AS - fear of going out, fear of human presence, and other poor reactions to humans. But she also engages very easily in eye contact, is capable of and desires close human relationships, and is clearly very congruent with her physical body. She just has to overcome the limitations posed by her PTSD to have the life which she, as a very normal person otherwise, desires. Even though she is so damaged she sometimes just sits in a corner away from everyone in the room, she has close friends, drives well, and is generally capable of focusing in the way that normal people do. She just had a really hard childhood.
The diagnosis of AS exists for a reason, and I think that the DSM's revision bringing it in with Autism not only shows that there is some sort of meaningful difference between people on the spectrum and others, but it shows that they had the opportunity to revise it into disappearing if they wanted to... and chose not to. Perhaps your only obvious AS trait here is your inability to accept authority and skill in other people.
I know making up your own rules for everything is tempting, but try to consider that you might be wrong.
Perhaps you even have such a low functioning form of autism that you can't reason very well if you're not careful, and make off topic posts in threads? Perhaps you are so locked inside yourself you can't imagine what it's like to be neurotypical, as I barely can from observation, and thus presume you are innately the same, with a different personality?
Try to understand the nature of a scale. We are called higher functioning for a reason. I don't think your argument really addresses that reality very well. It doesn't address MANY things very well.
I for one do not think there is such a gap in research that AS just doesn't exist. I've read some quite interesting research. Maybe you should read more. It would also improve your grammar.
It does exist, however it is not as distinct from disorders such as bi-polar distorder, borderline personality disorder, ADHD, ADD and other conditions that affect the frontal cortex as many people might think. There is a significant overlap and I would personally prefer a more neurological approach to these conditions rather than what appears to be very arbitrary psychological definitions.
I don't know. I'm one of those lucky aspies with plenty of friends. Most people don't know I have it unless I tell them. So I guess I'm a "stealth aspie." I can spy on NT's from the inside and then all their secrets will be ours! Mua ha ha ha ha!
I guess it's similar to why some NT's aren't as popular as others. Personality quirks, compatibility with others, agreeableness, etc.
I never was close with anyone except a select few.
my father, and my best friend lantz.
Ive had relationships, but as far as friendships go, I like having aquaintences. Not really anyone too close unless we are always sharing something.
in lantz's and my dad's case, they can relate to me, and inspire me, like I inspired them. symbiotic enough.
in relationships, we both were happy around each other.
im not really one for having a large group around me at any given moment.
I used to believe in this, but as I got older, it just doesn't work for me anymore. Maybe we're actually thinking of different subcultures here, but when I think of freak, I think goth, and that never works for me. They're often very judgmental (in a hypocritical way) and extremely selfish.
When you say the nerd subculture, I don't like the idea of the more extreme ones, as they're fairly rude. Also, if you're not into their obsessions to the extent they are......
Yeah, I guess I'm kinda negative. Apx, I don't mean to say your advice is wrong, if it works out for you, and brings success for others, awesome then!
I used to believe in this, but as I got older, it just doesn't work for me anymore. Maybe we're actually thinking of different subcultures here, but when I think of freak, I think goth, and that never works for me. They're often very judgmental (in a hypocritical way) and extremely selfish.
In my experience, the more people deviate from the norm the more likely they are to get along with. This deviation could be anything from a social deviance (like Asperger's), a physical handicap, a sexual deviance, a different culture or ethnicity, an unusual subculture, people with unusual hobbies, etc. I think that's what Apx means when he refers to "freaks". The reason for this is because deviation from the norm usually implies more life experience, more life experience implies more wisdom (common sense) and more wisdom implies a more open mind.
Although some goths are most definitely "freaks" in every meaning of the word, the rest aren't per se. Many of them are just posers who are into if for the cool outfits and music and those are the selfish hypocritical ones you're referring to. I used to hang around in Goth pubs and clubs myself, so I definitely can compare
Everything you say here in reference to nerds can be said in reference to people with Asperger's. If those are criteria for you with regards to people you want to hang out with, that seems a bit hypocritical in my opinion.
Well, it definitely works out for me. The "freaks" and "nerds" are most definitely the kind of people I feel most comfortable with and the more mainstream a person is the more likely I am to get bored with or annoyed by that person because from my perspective mainstream equals ignorant, shallow, irrational, arrogant, petty, ...
Everything you say here in reference to nerds can be said in reference to people with Asperger's. If those are criteria for you with regards to people you want to hang out with, that seems a bit hypocritical in my opinion.
My criteria? For what? I don't get it. Maybe I miscommunicated.
Lets try again. In my experience, the more extreme nerds tend to have some kind of obsession, and if you're not a die hard fan like they are, they never really give you a chance. And as for aspies, the few I met in person didn't even come close to what I just described. Sure, they had their obsessions, but you didn't have to be as obsessed as they were to be their friend. If you showed an interest, and gave them the space, they opened up eventually.
I'm into IT and therefore quite used to meeting nerds, geeks or however you want to call them. I don't share your impression at all.
From observing half-mainstreamed aspies and even non-mainstreamed auties in school, I can say that the following are factors:
1. Relative obscurity of the special interest - an intense though mainstream interest (such as video games) is more socially valuable than an offbeat one (such as renaissance women's clothing).
2. Sexual inclination - I have noticed that asexual and/or aromantic aspies have an easier time making friends than those who are more inclined to sexual attraction and crushes. This may be due to the fact that asexuals may find it easier to relate to both sexes without awkwardness, or because romantic/sexual aspies often obsess, make innapropriate advances, or even stalk the objects of their affection.
3. Parenting style - aspies with overprotective parents make fewer friends. Who wants to go to the house of a 15-year-old who is only allowed to watch Veggie Tales?
4. Attitude toward life - depressed, miserable, whiny, resentful aspies can't make friends. Happy aspies often attract people even if they're awkward.
5. Openness - aspies who disclose make more friends because their peers understand why they are different.
6. Willingness to touch - I knew a high-functioning girl who had trouble making friends because she asked people not to touch her on first meeting (she had severe sensory problems, but off-putting is off-putting). I also knew a near-nonverbal child with an IQ below 40 who had tons of friends because he would run up to people with a big grin on his face and ask for hugs.
There are probably more...I'll post them if I think of them.
_________________
Powered by quotes since 7/25/10
passionatebach
Velociraptor
Joined: 8 Nov 2009
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 447
Location: Cedar Rapids, Iowa
1. Relative obscurity of the special interest - an intense though mainstream interest (such as video games) is more socially valuable than an offbeat one (such as renaissance women's clothing).
2. Sexual inclination - I have noticed that asexual and/or aromantic aspies have an easier time making friends than those who are more inclined to sexual attraction and crushes. This may be due to the fact that asexuals may find it easier to relate to both sexes without awkwardness, or because romantic/sexual aspies often obsess, make innapropriate advances, or even stalk the objects of their affection.
3. Parenting style - aspies with overprotective parents make fewer friends. Who wants to go to the house of a 15-year-old who is only allowed to watch Veggie Tales?
4. Attitude toward life - depressed, miserable, whiny, resentful aspies can't make friends. Happy aspies often attract people even if they're awkward.
5. Openness - aspies who disclose make more friends because their peers understand why they are different.
6. Willingness to touch - I knew a high-functioning girl who had trouble making friends because she asked people not to touch her on first meeting (she had severe sensory problems, but off-putting is off-putting). I also knew a near-nonverbal child with an IQ below 40 who had tons of friends because he would run up to people with a big grin on his face and ask for hugs.
There are probably more...I'll post them if I think of them.
I can add a couple to your list.
1. I think that Aspies that seek out organizations and people that are tolerant, kind, and open have it better at making friends than Aspies that are introverted and don't seek groups out. As an example, I have found these type of people in the local Unitarian Universalist church and the local Democratic Party. Both organizations have the personalities of people that I have mentioned above, and both provide lots of social opportunities.
2. I also think that Aspies that are curious enough to partake in or get pushed into certain opportunites by their parents, teachers, and the community also have it better. In tandem with that, I think that there has to be acceptance of the Aspie to join the group. As an example, I often think of the time that I spent as manager of our basketball team in middle and high school. I had been pushed to join by my best friend, my parents and teachers. It was a life changing experience, that I don't know where I would be today had I not partaken of it, plus I made a number of friends and acquaintances that I still have to this day (15-20 years later).
Haha, agreeableness. The only conceivable way I am agreeable is when I actually agree. I'm going to die alone. xD
This does happen. I have even heard it from another aspie near me. I never encountered it myself in a way that put me off, though. I am also very selfish and... not really judgmental... but an elitist in my own right, so us mean people tend to get along.
I agree with Salon, though. Some of what you said does seem a bit odd.
I tend to find liberals too narrowminded for my taste actually.... I usually prefer people with very radical ideas (either "ultra-left" or "ultra-right") because they're used to being "different" from everyone else, which often makes them more openminded. Considering I've always been quite a radical myself, I also find such people easier to relate to.
Also, I generally feel more comfortable among extraverted people because I'm the extraverted kind of Aspie and I find extraverted people easier to relate to..
The same is true for extraverted Aspies. We do go through hell for a couple of years, but because we tend to talk too much rather than too little we at least get sufficient exercise when it comes to social interaction and this exercise is very valuable to learn what kind of behavior is expected in which situation.
The_Face_of_Boo
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Age: 42
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 33,043
Location: Beirut, Lebanon.
Try to understand the nature of a scale. We are called higher functioning for a reason. I don't think your argument really addresses that reality very well. It doesn't address MANY things very well.
lol , I am sensing some supremacy in that part , I am sensing that you meant to say: "We are higher functioning, we are smarter , you might be a lower functioning autie hence why you are posting off-topics in threads like a ret*d".
I read a lot.
lol another perfectionist grammar-nazi with the perfection complex.
I am not natively English-speaker and English isn't even my second language, after all , I am a poor low functioning trilingual person who's too locked inside himself. Can you speak Arabic ,French and English , Mr. HIGH functioning superior being?
Btw, LFAs are far better than you.
Actually.... no.... I pointed out the scale because you don't seem to understand that Autism and Asperger's are related. But good job proving in general how silly you are.
It doesn't really sound like you do.
I am not natively English-speaker and English isn't even my second language, after all , I am a poor low functioning trilingual person who's too locked inside himself. Can you speak Arabic ,French and English , Mr. HIGH functioning superior being?
Btw, LFAs are far better than you.
I'm not really a grammar nazi, when people who have trouble with it manage to avoid being stupid in other ways, it's quite alright. And I'm female.
Again, the high functioning isn't really a dig on anyone. I think LFA's are really interesting and probably *are* "better than me" in some ways. I'm really looking forward to learning about that. No, I think your troubles with whatever you have are quite personal. Whatever kind of autism you have or don't have, I just think you need to make sure you're dealing with it properly.
Maybe you shouldn't argue with people in English if you're not very good at it. I don't think it's really fair to the people around you. You come off as unjustifiably arrogant and a bit dumb, cos you seem to have trouble understanding it, not just typing it.
Please consider that before responding to me. I doubt you will even understand everything I said here, as you didn't last time. Maybe safer to argue in your native language, or be more self-aware when you argue in English? It's important to know one's limitations.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
I don't have friends and it's difficult to make them |
Today, 5:05 am |
Where to make friends as an autistic lesbian? |
16 Sep 2024, 4:18 am |
Illegal in Australia to make fun of redheads |
25 Aug 2024, 1:17 pm |
Video games and friends |
28 Sep 2024, 9:22 pm |