Do you think most people are annoying?
I admit sometimes I do. I have days where I don't want to talk to people and just be left alone to do what I want/need to do. But usually when someone wants to chat with me, I am more than willing to. I don't talk with people online much, mostly because I end up getting preoccupied and forget until later to message back.
History gal
Plenty of women have had the nerve to tell me that I was in the "wrong bathroom".
And they might be justified at saying that, because maybe a cisgender man could go into the women's bathroom and rape women
But whatever
Anyways
It doesn't matter how many "live and let live" women and men are on the solar system.
It only matters how many homophobes, racists, sexists, criminals, murderers, rapists, etc there are. And the answer is a lot
History gal
Plenty of women have had the nerve to tell me that I was in the "wrong bathroom".
And they might be justified at saying that, because maybe a cisgender man could go into the women's bathroom and rape women
But whatever
Anyways
It doesn't matter how many "live and let live" women and men are on the solar system.
It only matters how many homophobes, racists, sexists, criminals, murderers, rapists, etc there are. And the answer is a lot
history gal
it might seem "ridiculous" to you, that a crossdresser in the wrong bathroom or lockerroom might rape a cisgender woman. but many cisgender women do not find that prospect, the slightest bit "ridiculous".
sometimes it is just not practical to "Never give up" or "Be who you are". san diego 2004 was so homophobic. precious lil "people" kept looking me up and down, throwing things at me when i rode a bike, calling me "fa***t", physically assaulting me, asking me "are you a boy or a girl" and "why did you cut your hair?". some of them had the nerve to tell me that it was against their Christian religion to crossdress, much less transition. but plenty of churches have LGBT pride flags (and some have trans pride flags too). but whatever. for example Matthew Shepherd. just because someone has the moral high road, does not protect someone's body from rape and murder.
sometimes, it is the only functional recourse, to just "give up".
cost benefit analysis.
success is not always possible.
success is not always worth the effort it takes.
you have to live a balanced life.
for example, in male to female transsexual Jazz Jenning's book, it says that Jazz's dad won a civil lawsuit. as a result, Jazz got to play girls soccer. so. the lawsuit took over two years.
some lawyers charge 600 bucks an hour.
the current counselor told me that I/it was "setting a precedent", when i became the first transgender student in the wrong lockerroom at UCSD. and the Dean of UCSD told me that that changed the UCSD's policy.
fine. yes it was "setting a precedent".
but it is only necessary to worry about the entire Maslows Hierarcy of Needs.
where on the Hierarchy is the "need" or want or desire. or greed, for "setting a precedent"?
maybe "setting a precedent comes under self actualization
seriously though sometimes, i feel like, the advice "never give up" and "be yourself" are way too idealistic.
cost benefit analysis
some LGBT victims (and some cisgender heterosexual ones) have gotten raped and murdered and et cetera.
the word "never" is too absolute, and strong.
and dramatic.
There are justified reasons for anger
For example, injustice
history gal
It doesn't matter how many "live and let live" women and men are on the solar system.
Plenty of women have had the nerve to tell me that I was in the "wrong bathroom".
And they might be justified at saying that, because maybe a gender man could go into the women's bathroom and rape women
The reason why I wrote the previous post, was to answer Trojan of Peace's post, which said that if you can't beat them, join them. Or live outside it all. But creatures that live outside it all don't last long.
Even though I have tried, for a long time, to live outside it all, I completely agree with Trojan of peace.
The reason why I brought up the ucsd locker room, was that (in that instance), in a way, I "beat them", so I did not have to join them or live outside it all.
However, that was an isolated incident.
I don't think fair justice here is being served, unless its speaking over a woman who's barely said a private word against you. You're publicly demonising someone and publicly blowing an incident out of all proportion. For an older dude, that's acting quite sinister and spoiled in a cut-off fashion. You have remotely isolated yourself instead.
I personally think you should calm your prestige levels down, before you intend to let too much steam out of the air vent and end up suffocating someone based purely upon primal instinct., which would lend serious repercussions.
No one is getting a red letter day before peace is out, so put your energy into some greater focus.
If someone has had a poor experience, what right have you got to question it? You should be thanking yourself it's not you who's had these same probs. Why feel mocked now, if your problems started out years ago. It's not going to alter the stained glass facts and peel away the plaster beneath the struggles and troubling scenarios we trust we find ourselves in day in and day out.
I really think you should choose your next words wisely and stop now, before resuming your hate appeal because you wouldn't want history repeating itself based on, or without gender repercussions. The term 'crisis' you're referring to, is a midlife one.
You need to re organise your head space, before you cast another offshore backward glance, for timing your own execution and planning out your own classic point scoring with someone else.
There lies here a basic and painful realisation that you are not merely Gold finger with, a Midas touch of upturned class distinction who's digesting a bald fact, but one who's been signalled out on the once fast track road to refinement.
I wouldn't even call this a discussion, rather more like Unchained Melody hitting the wrong note down at the gym.
Yes, and I am reminded of their annoyance daily. I have SO many pet peeves, and people can just be obnoxious in general. I hate when (mostly females) talk using 'vocal fry' or smack their lips in between sentences.
_________________
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 126 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 86 of 200
You are very likely neurodiverse (Aspie)
Yes sometimes I think that "most people" are annoying.
Some of them offer to sell me drugs or ask if I have any. Some of them make gang symbols at me.
So I stay away from them, featuring they might rape me.
When I am trying to do something or go somewhere, sometimes some of them, are on a completely different wavelength. When I was pushing the bike, on the way to counseling, someone had the nerve to ask me if he could purchase my map. It's like wtf
Some of them sometimes stink olfactorially. But I do not say anything, because that might provoke them into raping me.
But plenty of times someone has the nerve to comment on my appearance
It's more their attitude.
"Holier than thou"
Like I can't do anything just because some random stranger does not like it
How about, I do not like it when they micromanage me?
Sometimes some of them talk too much and too loud, even in the bookstore
I can't read a book when they act like every time they have a thought or emotion, it is as awesome as, the latest greatest scientific discovery.
Two precious lil "people" were at the bookstore flapping their precious lil traps. Everything from shaving, to sports, to.... Slavery. Slavery? Seriously?
But I was afraid that if I asked them to be quiet, they would have had the nerve to, tell me, that I was, being "rude" or "disrespectful"
And when I say something that they do not like they have the nerve to say "shut up"
Precious lil former "friends"
And then some precious lil "people" have the nerve to tell me that "we care about you" or that they were "trying to help" me. But they do not treat me like their "awesome friends". Furthermore they have the nerve to interrupt me when I talk and grunt "huh", "what", "eh", "ha" "hm". Like it is the etiquette equivalent of "excuse me"
They were not listening
And they acted like, they earned or deserve a Nobel prize for successfully refraining from exterminating my worthless corpse
Clearly, some peeps can act like themselves whereas different nations with a fairer modelled supportive approach, want to deem others say too much, or like someone will have misquoted, poured venom into it. I think it was already there, without someone rambling on and allowing me to put my foot into it. Had i known one man/woman would want to be trodden over by some self satisfying egos, with added contempt, i would let the person speak for themselves, but not at the expense of others, and not without some honest input. Seeing as that didnt happen, i feel that even thread instructors need to target the level of input across a mandatory range.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
annoying lil dipshits |
12 Sep 2024, 11:27 am |
My people! |
18 Sep 2024, 10:06 pm |
Hi people |
18 Sep 2024, 10:08 pm |
Why do people get surprised if you're a certain age and... |
11 Nov 2024, 12:40 pm |