curtis122 wrote:
Thanks alot so the general rules seems to be : Dont say or do anything which could or could be misconstrued as harmful E.G if somone is not very good at sining but they are going to enter a talent contest it would be mean to tell them that they should not enter because they are not a good singer.
Not necessarily. If you took them aside and just between the two of you, you quietly told them that they really needed to re-think this singing thing, particularly doing it in public in front of an audience, that would be one thing. Personally I don't think that's mean.
But, say you publicly say to them in front of a group of friends that their singing really sucks and they're out of their mind to enter this contest? Yeah, that'd be mean in my book.
FWIW, my problem is that I can ONLY draw distinctions like the above if I am really thinking, and thinking hard. The kind of thing that I find really exhausting to do continuously, meaning I just can't do it 24/7. I burn out if I try. So sometimes I'm tactful and other times...not. And most of the time I just withdraw since I don't trust any spontaneous response to be the right one. What NTs do reflexively I have to do as a conscious act or thought. And that takes time and effort. Which is why I have such a full social calendar.
_________________
"The man who has fed the chicken every day throughout its life at last wrings its neck instead, showing that more refined views as to the uniformity of nature would have been useful to the chicken." ? Bertrand Russell