Janissy wrote:
b9 wrote:
i do not.......
.
And yet you made up a joke that was so funny and clever that I'm using it in real life.
This was your joke:
Why were the woods full of wrecked cars?
Because of the NTs who couldn't see the trees for the forest.
This is a brilliant joke and has made some of my friends laugh. (I only tell it to friends who have a family member with autism. Otherwise they don't know what "NT" means and don't get the joke.)
You baffle me sometimes. You make brilliant jokes but don't understand what makes a joke good or bad. But you must on some level. Otherwise you couldn't have made such a good joke.
i can create personal metaphors, but i can not understand externally offered ones.
i can create personal jokes but i can not understand most jokes that are said to me.
those that i do understand do not elicit laughter from me but mere acknowledgment.
the wrecks in the forest joke was just a joke in a series of attempts that i thought up for that thread.
i understand the programmatic coding for joke creation in a way, but i do not understand the emotional attachment to jokes that make people laugh.
if i make up a good joke, it is simply one that works to make others laugh amid a parade of other attempted jokes that do not makes people laugh. it was a fluke that the jungle debris joke caught your sense of humor.
i see a methodology in things that i try to understand, but i never have an instinctive flair for anything.
gina-ghettoprincess wrote:
I laugh anyway if it's part of a conversation with my friends, cos we laugh hysterically at things that aren't particularly funny anyway, LOL.
i can not laugh in symphony with other people because they are never thinking the same thing that i am when i laugh.
gina-ghettoprincess wrote:
I really like b9's idea of telling jokes that aren't really jokes to see what their response is, LOL.
there is a potential problem with saying nonsense jokes, and that is if the other person honestly says "i do not get it. please explain".
that has not happened to me yet because most people think that the joke must be valid, and they laugh anyway to be correct in a social protocol.
i have thought that if anyone asks me to explain the joke (after they have laughed at it, and then scratched their head, and after i have laughed severely at them laughing at it with them thinking i am laughing at the actual joke and not at them) , then i would say "i do not understand what the joke means, but since you laughed at it, you verified that it was funny, and so i thought it was worth a laugh as well"
that would be a lie, but it is better than saying "i just made it up and it means nothing and i am sorry i made a fool out of you".
i am not that mean.
whatever i am not good at interaction.