subatai_baadur wrote:
The US has many, MANY faults, but we are competant enough in military matters of the past(kindly disregard Vietnam and Iraq: The Revenge). It was a lot of luck that resulted in our military past not being complete s**t, but it is still solid. As for militaries; why it has everything to do with sports. Wars require strength, strategy, and solid training as well as a scouted enemy. Military campaigns require strength, stategy, solid training, and a well scouted enemy. The only difference is the lack of killing, and I've seen some soccer players that would have you think they were being killed(along with the Colombian incident).
A few other differences between war and sport:
Sport isn't played against an enemy, it's played against an opponent. The difference being that you can at least recognise and respect the objectives of an opponent as being the same as your own.
You have to win at sport in your own right, not use your economic power to coerce and intimidate other teams into backing you against a smaller, lone opponent.
When you get a red card in soccer, you can't simply declare the referee "irrelevant" and continue playing.
...Well there are but a few. But hey, I'm not anti-US, there's a lot of good people there who are at least vaguely pissed off about being misled into the last war. Not like Oz where we just take our PM's advice and just get over it.