I used to look at assignments very carefully, analyze the exact meaning, and if it was open to interpretation, I would deliberately choose the less likely interpretation.. then give the teacher or professor *hell* for not being clear to begin with.
I well remember a 500 word treatise on the use of language, logic, and questions which are biased to elicit a specific response regardless of any facts when set an assignment "Too much chocolate is bad for you. Discuss." without ever using the word "chocolate" in my work, and pointing out that "too much" of anything must by definition be bad, or it wouldn't be too much. Fortunately that teacher actually understood the points I made, and I got a reasonable mark in spite of purposely "Missing the whole point." Future assignments from him were more carefully worded.
To be fair, it was an English language course, I doubt I'd have got away with that if it had been human biology, or something related to health.
If an assignment *can* be misinterpreted or misunderstood, then the failing is with those who set it, and poor marks or grades resulting from the fact you did should always be appealed.. to teach those setting it to use language more carefully.
Some would say I was a troublemaker, incidentally, this was all decades prior to my diagnosis.