The_Face_of_Boo wrote:
Honestly, he is the one who may be too old to have a baby, not you. There's also this misconception that men's age has no effect in their ability to have babies - let alone healthy babies, modern science is proving that it does, big time.
Also it's logistically harder on him, in his age, to be a contributing father, to take care of babies and run with them and teach them all sorts of stuff. Usually humans get weaker and less energetic with age.
When your child is 10, he would be 66, when your child is 18 he would be 74.
So if you're insisting to have a child from him, it's NOW or never, you can't wait few more years.
My uncle just had a kid and he's in his mid 60's. His wife is in her 30s. Kinda weird IMO. But it is no misconception that men can remain fertile into advanced age. Their testosterone levels will be lower than their prime but not necessarily so low they will be infertile.
As someone who is completely infertile, I would say nobody should hold themselves back from having kids if that's what they want to do. To say the old shouldn't reproduce is kind of eugenics-tier.