Mona Pereth wrote:
I disagree with your ranking.
I'm not capable of participating in most parties. Unfocused multi-person chit chat, where the topic changes every 10 seconds or so, is utterly confusing and frustrating to me.
The only kinds of social events I can participate in well are ones with a clearly defined structure and focus, and where I know in advance what to expect.
Also I am just not interested in attending any social event at all unless it revolves around a theme that interests me.
Also I'm not good at sales.
However, I have a long history of organizing groups and events. If I'm in charge of an event -- or if, for whatever reason, I'm the natural center of attention -- then I'm in a position to structure things the way I need them to be structured. Also, if I'm in charge of an event, I try to keep an eye out for people who appear lonely or awkward, or who are being ignored by other attendees, and I try to do what I can to help them feel more comfortable, such as introducing them to people I think they would enjoy talking to.
EDIT: Years ago I used to know a guy who was a former local radio DJ and who then worked as an emcee at large parties, but who had a lot of trouble with one-on-one conversation.
So there's no single linear scale of social abilities. A lot of autistic people have spiky ability profiles as far as socializing is concerned, just like a lot of us have spike cognitive profiles.
My sociability varies a lot, but I do see a sort of scale here. Maybe just because you're supposed to see one?
How social I am depends on the group. With most social situations, it's 2 or 3. At library staff meetings, it is 5 or 6. I can manage 7 for short bursts at work (tech instruction, not sales, though), but that uses a lot of spoons. In my radio club, it's between 6 And 9. Might rarely get to 10. And I see I'm not the only one who gets annoyed when the conversation subject changes well before I'm done with the topic or sometimes before I can get a word in edgewise.