Schrödinger's Douchebag

Post Reply New Topic

It takes two to tango drama.


The poster is half of the whole, the reader is also half of the whole.
It seems logically to blame the poster, yes? For making the reader lead towards the poster that did it in the first place.


Knowing the nature of several autistics' loose traction of thought and intense emotions, and it's vulnerabilities to anxieties, not to mention so much lack of fulfillments and the ever alarms of vigilance in life...

It is possible for each remarks can tend to be over thought, over felt and recursively.
As if, they're are but pinballs made of thoughts and emotions.

Each mistakes. Each criticisms. Each remarks. Each post. Each thoughts. Each memories of it. Each unintentionalities.
And each hypothetical scenarios.

That includes feelings. Urge to be right. Urge to express. Urge to be understood or understand.

Predictable. Gullible. Most humans do, it's just autistics are more prone to said thought loops and traps.

No wonder some cases ends up in a shutdown or some overheat like failure as soon as depression hits, that causes one to lose their once absorbent and reliable memories, decode and recall in long term.

Or worse.
Few ended up stronger or finer or wiser, but clearly not everyone.

Gained Number Post Count (1).
Lose Time (n).

Lose more time here - Updates at least once a week.

^ Yes, it could be that is the only role they know. We have limited communication skills and some are more limited than others. So, I behave like X, and sometimes people laugh and I get reinforcement because people have laughed at my joke.

Other times people are angry, so I back off with a "I was just joking."

The "I" here is editorial. But speaking from personal experience, people almost never get my jokes and sometimes people are offended by something I have said and I have no idea why or even what I said.

Maybe there is something to be learned here. For me, I mean.

I've dealt with a few of those types here.