Why Ideology Is Guiding Pain Care, Not Science

Page 1 of 1 [ 5 posts ] 

kitesandtrainsandcats
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2016
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,965
Location: Missouri

19 Apr 2021, 12:02 pm

Came across this a little bit ago via someone in the disability community on Tumblr.

Why Ideology Is Guiding Pain Care, Not Science
April 19, 2021

By Roger Chriss, PNN Columnist

Quote:
An overarching question in pain management and the opioid crisis is whether or not prescription opioids have any value in treating chronic non-cancer pain.

Some say that the answer is a resounding “No.” Studies to date are often too small, methodologically weak or too short-term to be convincing. But these same studies are often used to claim lack of efficacy, and for the same reasons they cannot do that.

At present, we don’t know if or how well opioids work for chronic pain. To establish efficacy, we’d need major studies or clinical trials that run for years, using many hundreds or even thousands of patients. Opioids would need to be compared to placebo or other treatments for various forms of chronic non-cancer pain, from inflammatory and autoimmune conditions to neuropathies and genetic disorders.

Such studies have not been done.


https://www.painnewsnetwork.org/stories ... management

Quote:
The solution would be to do major trials. But there seems to be little incentive to do this. The opioid crisis and associated ideological debate about drug legalization have combined with lawsuits and public health policy to remove any motivation to find out more about efficacy. The results of such a study could sway outcomes in the ongoing opioid litigation or ignite new lawsuits, or could even cripple advocacy groups on either side of the opioid divide.


_________________
"There are a thousand things that can happen when you go light a rocket engine, and only one of them is good."
Tom Mueller of SpaceX, in Air and Space, Jan. 2011


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

19 Apr 2021, 12:56 pm

The one thing that inhibits scientists in the development of effective pain relief is that there is no reliable method for objective measurement of pain -- it is all based on a patient's own subjective judgement, and not on a scalar value displayed on a calibrated instrument.  Examples:

• Location: "Where does it hurt?"
• Area: "Just one spot or is it spread out?"
• Trigger: "What do you think caused the pain?"
• Treatment: "What makes the pain better/worse?"
• Time-of-Day: "When does the pain usually occur?"
• Intensity: "On a scale from 0 to 10, how much pain do you feel?"
• Character: "Does the pain feel like aching, burning, pinching, stabbing, or throbbing?"

Note that depression may increase patients' perception of pain, and their ethics/morals may cause them to downplay the severity of their pain.

What doctors need is a non-invasive instrument that they can use to objectively measure a patient's pain -- a poineometer.  Such a device would drastically cut down on writing opioid prescriptions for people who do not need them, and likely increase the amount of proper treatments for pain.



threetoed snail
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

Joined: 13 Apr 2021
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 183
Location: landmass surrounded by oceans

19 Apr 2021, 4:13 pm

I don't suffer from chronic pain issues (yet), but I have reasons to believe it's not unlikely that I will eventually.

My hope is that by then there will finally have been a breakthrough in non-addictive pain relief (and hopefully non-addictive sedatives / muscle relaxants too -- I could definitely use that already). Otherwise... :? Things don't look too promising.


_________________
lorem ipsum


nick007
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 May 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,774
Location: was Louisiana but now Vermont in capitalistic military dictatorship called USA

21 Apr 2021, 5:07 am

Fnord wrote:
Note that depression may increase patients' perception of pain, and their ethics/morals may cause them to downplay the severity of their pain.
Lots of docs automatically assume that if a patient has depression & complains of physical pain that the patient must be a druggie who is faking or that the pain is psychosomatic & all in their head. Having long-term physical pain can cause people to develop depression. Being gasslighted, dismissed, & screwed over by the medical profession can cause & increase a patient's depression, & being more depressed will increase the likelihood that the patient's physical pain will be written off & it's a vicious cycle that just gets worse. Some people with depression & physical pain can fairly easily get stimulants, sleeping meds, benzodiazepines, & marijuana prescribed by their psychiatrist or GP but they can NOT find a doc who will do anything for their physical pain other than tell them to take Tylenol. Some patients can literally get all that stuff for their depression but can NOT get any narcotics when they have their gallbladder removed. I fail to comprehend how all that stuff combined is considered sooo much safer than prescribing a depressed person any narcotics when they literally had an organ removed :? The medical community needs to advance a hell of a lot more with their understanding, research, & treatment for depression & physical pain & people who have both problems.


_________________
"I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem!"
~King Of The Hill


"Hear all, trust nothing"
~Ferengi Rule Of Acquisition #190
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Ru ... cquisition


kitesandtrainsandcats
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2016
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,965
Location: Missouri

21 Apr 2021, 8:22 am

nick007 wrote:
The medical community needs to advance a hell of a lot more with their understanding, research, & treatment for depression & physical pain & people who have both problems.

Amen! to that.

Quote:
Lots of docs automatically assume that if a patient has depression & complains of physical pain that the patient must be a druggie who is faking or that the pain is psychosomatic & all in their head.

and it also doesn't help if you were diagnosed with depression and bipolar in 1982 and it wasn't until 2000-something that some medical professional finally went, "You aren't bipolar, never been bipolar, you're autistic; here's the evidence I see why ..."

Then add in having acquired fibromyalgia and ME/CFS at beginning of 2000s after they hit your Dad at beginning of 1980s.

Sometime in the last several years I went to ER for a serious attack of chronic muscle spasms in my back which usually center around a 1990s spinal injury.
Got the sense they were assuming I was a drug seeker and weren't much concerned about my body.

Then ...

Eventually ...

After a while ...

Doctor comes in, lifts gown to look at my back ...

About two seconds of silence, and then, "Oh."

In short order they were giving me an injection of some powerful stuff.

That's the thing, with so many doctors is has to literally be In. Their. Face. Obvious. before they even begin to be capable of grasping the concept.

Yeah, the spasms were severe enough the Doctor SAW them.

And all of a sudden they were something which required immediate intervention.

But ...

Because of a prior incorrect diagnosis, assumptions were made ...

without investigation or examination.

Remember boys and girls, doctors are really smart people who pay a whole lotta money to get the world's best education from other really, really, smart people.

(snork!)

(yeah, right)

(sure they are and sure they do)

(say, does it sound like doctors might no longer impress me?)

(and, yes, by the way, I am broadbrushing the entire lot of them)


_________________
"There are a thousand things that can happen when you go light a rocket engine, and only one of them is good."
Tom Mueller of SpaceX, in Air and Space, Jan. 2011