you wondered about Fauci and Wuhan

Post Reply New Topic

So after reading , am wondering , very seriously why Fauci has not be criminally implicated
in this virus outbreak , especially as i have read that Fauci in a big investor in one of the pharmacuetical giants that manufacture these covid vaccines . See below from OAN news:

The National Institutes of Health has finally admitted to funding gain of function research on bat coronaviruses in it's Wuhan laboratory despite Dr. Fauci's denials to congress that no such research took place.

The admission came in a letter addressed Kentucky congressman James Comer on Wednesday, in which NIH's principal deputy director Lawrence A. Tabak refers to a 'limited experiment' conducted to test if 'spike proteins from naturally occurring bat coronaviruses circulating in China were capable of binding to the human ACE2 receptor in a mouse model,' at the Wuhan lab.

According to Tabak, the mice infected with the modified bat virus 'became sicker' than those infected with the unmodified bat virus.

Last edited by Jakki on 22 Oct 2021, 12:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

So first of all, I would ever trust anything that Dr. Fauci says as it's been proven that he lies all the time and has gotten away with it for years.

You need a 4th choice:

"I don't GAF and why should I unless I had an axe to grind against Fauci, China, etc?"

Dr. Fauci has not been indicted due to lack of valid evidence. Assumptions, lies, rumors, and suspicions posted on Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube are neither valid nor evidential.

NIH ....?

...?

 Link to NIH Website 

I really wish you people would learn how to do web searches.

The "valid" evidence is being hidden, because Big Media is as liberal as Fauci. Also, Facebook and YouTube are hiding the evidence too, by censoring all conservative posts. At the same time, much of last year's looting was planned via Facebook events, although the paid "protesters" were hired via the dark web. If you want the valid evidence you speak of, you gotta go to Gab, Parler, OAN, and Newsmax. But not many people know about or use those.

Wake the hell up!

There's probably a very good reason for that.

have heard of some of those , and actually know many many people whom enjooy watching those.
Mainly OAN .... although . alll of those probably should not have been lumped together .
But i do like getting both sides of a story .

Ah, yes, what's more likely? That you're a conspiracist whackjob listening to other conspiracist whackjobs, or that somehow "Big Media" has managed to unite nearly everyone in some malicious scheme for no apparent motivation?

Probably not the best site for name calling ......? or starting a rukus , while one does that.

Hey, one person's trash is another person's treasure. What I see on OAN, Newmax, Parler, and the dark web is far more plausible to me than ANYTHING I see on Big Media and Big Tech.