Mona Pereth wrote:
Brain Weevil wrote:
Before teaching science at the secondary level, I taught philosophy at the university level. Adjunct teaching got really tiresome. My name on this forum is a reference to the fact that many students in required philosophy courses believe it is useless, and a minority of those are firmly opposed to it, seeing it as actually harmful to their well-being.
On what grounds did they deem philosophy to be "actually harmful to their well-being"???
Welcome to Wrong Planet!
Thank you!
Philosophy causes one to question one's founding assumptions. I guess some college students aren't mature enough to cope with that. My intro course usually covered four topics: Theory of knowledge, political theory, ethics, and philosophy of religion. I choose that order because the topics are successively more threatening. (No one seriously doubts empiricist theory of knowledge

. No one likes rejection of representative government, but they feel pretty secure in rejecting old dead white dudes' rejections of it

. Everyone feels comfortable about their ethical choices

, until they are forced to compare their choices with a consistent, reasonably strict standard. Nobody wants you messing the tiniest bit about their beliefs in a god!

)
Teaching younger persons allows me to do more good, I think, because they can acquire more critical thinking skills more easily, due to bad habits having less momentum.
_________________
Diagnosed with severe ADHD [combined subtype] in 2012, age of 52. "Informally diagnosed" in 2021 as on the spectrum by two professional psychologists, deciding independently.
The world is not merely stranger than we suppose. It is stranger than we can suppose.
J. B. S. Haldane, (1892 – 1964) British biochemist.