"ladies and gentlemen, honored guests!"

Page 5 of 5 [ 79 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

babybird
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 77,317
Location: UK

25 Feb 2023, 4:04 pm

If someone said Happy Halloween to me I'd think it was a bit odd being as it's not really a thing we say in the UK. I wouldn't be offended by it though.

Same as if someone said Happy Holidays.

I'm talking about offline here of course.


_________________
We have existence


funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 30,256
Location: Right over your left shoulder

25 Feb 2023, 5:57 pm

Hey meatbags!


_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
You can't advance to the next level without stomping on a few Koopas.


Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

26 Feb 2023, 2:05 am

Sonic200 wrote:
It's an extension of "ladies and gentlemen! used to include people who identify as agender.


Ladies, gentlemen, and gender diverse?
I am pretty sure this would offend someone also, however. 8)



babybird
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 77,317
Location: UK

26 Feb 2023, 4:43 am

If the only thing I had to worry about in my life was pronouns I'd be a very happy dog


_________________
We have existence


Sonic200
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

Joined: 12 Jul 2021
Gender: Male
Posts: 430

26 Feb 2023, 9:41 am

Pepe wrote:
Sonic200 wrote:
It's an extension of "ladies and gentlemen! used to include people who identify as agender.


Ladies, gentlemen, and gender diverse?
I am pretty sure this would offend someone also, however. 8)


"Ladies, gentlemen, and agenders!"

"Ladies, gentlemen, and others!"

"Gentlepeople!"



Readydaer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Dec 2022
Gender: Female
Posts: 868
Location: Court of Fontaine

26 Feb 2023, 2:22 pm

"Those who dare to stand before me..."


_________________
My god. jelly donuts are so scary.


Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

26 Feb 2023, 6:05 pm

Sonic200 wrote:
Pepe wrote:
Sonic200 wrote:
It's an extension of "ladies and gentlemen! used to include people who identify as agender.


Ladies, gentlemen, and gender diverse?
I am pretty sure this would offend someone also, however. 8)


"Ladies, gentlemen, and agenders!"

"Ladies, gentlemen, and others!"

"Gentlepeople!"


OUCH!
Keep that one to yourself. :mrgreen:
"Others" sounds as though they are superfluous, IMO. 8O



Sonic200
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

Joined: 12 Jul 2021
Gender: Male
Posts: 430

26 Feb 2023, 6:21 pm

"Gentlebeings!"

It includes those who identify as therians (real animals like wolves) and otherkin (legendary beings like mermaids and dragons, fictional characters, objects, or concepts).



naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 70
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

26 Feb 2023, 9:58 pm

At first I read "agenders" as "aGENDers". Folks who have a secret ...agenda!

Not as "AYEgenders" (folks without gender).



Readydaer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Dec 2022
Gender: Female
Posts: 868
Location: Court of Fontaine

27 Feb 2023, 8:27 am

Sonic200 wrote:
"Gentlebeings!"

It includes those who identify as therians (real animals like wolves) and otherkin (legendary beings like mermaids and dragons, fictional characters, objects, or concepts).


the school of thought of identifying as animals, fictional or otherwise, warrants the question of if they deserve human rights. I think that it's fine to return to primal simplicity, like the Daodejing says, but taking it too far is odd. However, if they want it that badly, they can surrender their human rights and go live in the woods. This is different from the 'furry' thing, I think. Where does it end? Suppose I identify as a protected species?

If even a trans woman questions it, maybe it's too far lol


_________________
My god. jelly donuts are so scary.


The_Walrus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,866
Location: London

27 Feb 2023, 5:39 pm

Readydaer wrote:
Sonic200 wrote:
"Gentlebeings!"

It includes those who identify as therians (real animals like wolves) and otherkin (legendary beings like mermaids and dragons, fictional characters, objects, or concepts).


the school of thought of identifying as animals, fictional or otherwise, warrants the question of if they deserve human rights. I think that it's fine to return to primal simplicity, like the Daodejing says, but taking it too far is odd. However, if they want it that badly, they can surrender their human rights and go live in the woods. This is different from the 'furry' thing, I think. Where does it end? Suppose I identify as a protected species?

If even a trans woman questions it, maybe it's too far lol

Well, my view is that it's none of my business what someone else identifies as, even if I don't understand it.

"Human" rights should not be awarded based on identity or even species, but based on whether they're fundamentally self-aware enough to suffer as a result of being deprived of them. I think this is a threshold that every human who has brain activity meets, regardless of whether they personally feel like a mermaid or whatever. The act of being able to say "I identify as a mermaid", while bizarre to me, is proof that the person is capable of the sort of cognition that should entitle them to the same legal rights as a human.

If you identify as a protected species - so what? We already give all humans more rights than we give any protected species. Nobody is going to introduce humans into captive breeding programmes.

But frankly I'll think seriously about otherkin when I start seeing functioning adults, in real life, requesting medical treatment in such numbers that scientific journals cover it. I see no reason to be concerned about teenage experimentation, or indeed that of vulnerable, powerless adults.



magz
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2017
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,283
Location: Poland

28 Feb 2023, 1:53 am

My daughters "identify" as a cat and a puppy.
Of course, they know they physically aren't but this helps them explain really a lot about how they experience the world and interact with it.
My RL friend has a very strong animal identity, too.

In totemic belief systems, such things are considered normal - so I suspect it's quite widespread IRL. Body modifications are probably more connected to general acceptance for body modifications in a given culture.


_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.

<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>


Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

28 Feb 2023, 2:17 am

magz wrote:
My daughters "identify" as a cat and a puppy.
Of course, they know they physically aren't but this helps them explain really a lot about how they experience the world and interact with it.
My RL friend has a very strong animal identity, too.

In totemic belief systems, such things are considered normal - so I suspect it's quite widespread IRL. Body modifications are probably more connected to general acceptance for body modifications in a given culture.


I have always identified with the lone wolf. 8)



Readydaer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Dec 2022
Gender: Female
Posts: 868
Location: Court of Fontaine

28 Feb 2023, 7:50 am

The_Walrus wrote:
Well, my view is that it's none of my business what someone else identifies as, even if I don't understand it.

"Human" rights should not be awarded based on identity or even species, but based on whether they're fundamentally self-aware enough to suffer as a result of being deprived of them. I think this is a threshold that every human who has brain activity meets, regardless of whether they personally feel like a mermaid or whatever. The act of being able to say "I identify as a mermaid", while bizarre to me, is proof that the person is capable of the sort of cognition that should entitle them to the same legal rights as a human.

If you identify as a protected species - so what? We already give all humans more rights than we give any protected species. Nobody is going to introduce humans into captive breeding programmes.

But frankly I'll think seriously about otherkin when I start seeing functioning adults, in real life, requesting medical treatment in such numbers that scientific journals cover it. I see no reason to be concerned about teenage experimentation, or indeed that of vulnerable, powerless adults.


you make good points. What medical treatment would otherkin ask for? artificial claws? fishtails?! 8O


_________________
My god. jelly donuts are so scary.


Sonic200
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

Joined: 12 Jul 2021
Gender: Male
Posts: 430

28 Feb 2023, 8:18 am

magz wrote:
My daughters "identify" as a cat and a puppy.
Of course, they know they physically aren't but this helps them explain really a lot about how they experience the world and interact with it.
My RL friend has a very strong animal identity, too.

In totemic belief systems, such things are considered normal - so I suspect it's quite widespread IRL. Body modifications are probably more connected to general acceptance for body modifications in a given culture.


Yes, therians and otherkin are aware that they are physically human even though they identify as an animal.

Clinical lycanthropy is a disorder where people believe they are actually an animal (nonhuman) physically.