LOGIC proves that trump tried to VIOLENTLY STEAL the electio

Post Reply New Topic

I will prove with PURE LOGIC that trump tried to VIOLENTLY STEAL the election. You do not even have to verify any facts!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modus_tollens 1. If "A" then "B". 2. NOT "B" 3. Therefore NOT "A". For example, all dogs are mammals. That is not a mammal. Therefore, it cannot be a dog! 1. If the election was stolen then the following CONSERVATIVES: Trump's Justice department, Trump's Vice President, Trump's 3 Supreme Court appointees Trump's campaign manager, REPUBLICAN RECOUNTERS, ULTRA CONSERVATIVE Liz Cheney, Trump's fanatical supporter / secretary of education and even Hannity and Tucker are liberal Democrats. They all insisted that the election was fair. 2. It is NOT true that they are liberal Democrats. 3. Therefore, the election was not stolen.
OK, you will scream what your CULT leader programmed you to scream, " fake news" that is OUTRAGEOUSLY STUPID! If Trump's Justice department (THAT HE APPOINTED!) and/or Trump's Supreme Court appointees had said the election was stolen Trump would be president. Trump is not president. Therefore, it is obvious Trump's administration ruled that Biden won!
If a syllogism is valid and its facts are correct, the conclusion has to be true. Here is a free logic lesson! Validity and truth are not the same thing. Here is a syllogism that is valid but not true. 1. All vampires eat snakes. 2. Bob is a vampire. 3. Therefore, Bob eats snakes. Here is a syllogism that is true but not valid. 1. Obama was president. 2. Nixon was president. 3. Therefore, Michigan is in the USA. What you aim for is a SOUND syllogism (one that is valid and has true statements) 1. Socrates was a man. 2. All men are mortal. 3. Therefore, Socrates was mortal. OK, so my FACTS are correct and my argument is VALID! That means my conclusion has to be correct, that the election was not stolen!
Of course, you may object that Jan 6 was peaceful! OK so if BLM, KKK, Nazis, Communists... did the EXACT same thing, there would be nothing wrong with that? They should be allowed to take over the Capitol, vandalize it and threaten to murder the CONSERVATIVE Vice President (Pence)???? Of course, even a rumper will object to BLM doing that! So therefore, he contradicts himself and so therefore his position cannot be correct!
Here is a GREAT worksheet that will introduce you to the wonderful world of LOGIC!
https://people.umass.edu/klement/100/lo ... Z_xep9lYOA

I don't think you'll find much dissent from your conclusions here. It was pretty obvious what went down that day.