Female false red flag signals

Page 2 of 2 [ 32 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

bee33
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Apr 2008
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,415

13 Oct 2024, 6:42 pm

I think both intuition and looking out for red flags can be useful, but currently the concept of what is a red flag has so devolved that any oddity becomes a reason to label someone creepy or stalkerish. Then new victims are created, namely the socially inept who only want to make human connections but suddenly find themselves labeled as something awful. This doesn't help women feel or become any safer, in addition to being unfair to neurodivergent men.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,706
Location: Stendec

13 Oct 2024, 7:19 pm

bee33 wrote:
I think both intuition and looking out for red flags can be useful, but currently the concept of what is a red flag has so devolved that any oddity becomes a reason to label someone creepy or stalkerish. Then new victims are created, namely the socially inept who only want to make human connections but suddenly find themselves labeled as something awful. This doesn't help women feel or become any safer, in addition to being unfair to neurodivergent men.
It's called being "Creepzoned" -- a little more traumatic to the man than being merely "Friendzoned", but less traumatic than being arrested.

Guys seem to get creepzoned for a lot of reasons. Generally, it seems to be caused by men behaving in ways that ignore social norms surrounding personal space, privacy, and sexuality.


_________________
 
No love for Hamas, Hezbollah, Iranian Leadership, Islamic Jihad, other Islamic terrorist groups, OR their supporters and sympathizers.


ChicagoLiz
Raven
Raven

Joined: 18 Oct 2023
Age: 63
Gender: Female
Posts: 113
Location: Chicago

13 Oct 2024, 8:28 pm

How much time is elapsing?

If you start talking to a woman you don't know, and within the first 5 minutes are already "bringing up" that they seem to be cautious around you, then don't do that. That absolutely is a red flag, because abusive people will push like that. How would someone who doesn't know you understand that in your case it's not a danger signal? So don't do it.

If you've been talking with a woman regularly for weeks, getting along fine, and then all of a sudden for no reason (you haven't said or done anything out of the ordinary) they walk away and ghost you, then that's on them and you're better off without them.


_________________
When the sun rises, look for silent fading stars.


BillyTree
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Oct 2023
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 717

14 Oct 2024, 10:52 am

There is a problem with red flag signals if they catch socially awkward autistics while socially skilled psychopaths and narcissists fly under the radar.


_________________
English is not my first language.


babybird
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 73,131
Location: UK

14 Oct 2024, 10:54 am

BillyTree wrote:
There is a problem with red flag signals if they catch socially awkward autistics while socially skilled psychopaths and narcissists fly under the radar.


You've just hit the nail on the head my friend


_________________
We have existence


TwilightPrincess
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Sep 2016
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 26,821
Location: Hell

14 Oct 2024, 11:05 am

Sometimes a person can be a socially awkward autistic and an abuser/manipulator. We’ve had some of them on WP. It’s not a mutually exclusive thing.

Most neurodivergent individuals, no matter their gender, aren’t (considered) inherently creepy. Many do find partners although it may take more time and effort to get there for some. A willingness to adapt and make changes might help with that or just finding ways to meet new people if the issue is solely that they’re odd. There are a lot of women out there who are also odd, myself included.

I think it’s a good idea for most people - neurodivergent or not - to work on social skills. I’m saying that as someone who needs to work on those things, too. I’m extremely shy and withdrawn offline.

It might help to get to the bottom of why one is making others uncomfortable, especially if it’s a pattern and not just a one-off thing. Sure, some can be hypervigilant, but if it’s something that multiple people have alluded to, that’s a little different IMO. Maybe there’s a relatively easy fix to it, like not invading people’s personal space, not following folks around, or not looking at one person for too long. I’ve worked on the latter thing because I can daydream and not pay attention to where I’m looking, not that anyone has ever complained about it.

It’s a lot easier to suggest that people are being too sensitive or whatever than make adjustments. I’m trying to be helpful when I say that because, in some cases, not making adjustments is probably not going to lead to happiness long term. Historically on WP, I’ve often observed a resistance in this regard. Once again, I’m not referring to things one can’t help, benign oddness, or one-off situations.

My main point: It might be a good idea to work on things you can improve, like concerning behavior if there is any, and/or find ways to meet new people you might have things in common with. I bet it’s easier to appear creepy in bars or clubs, especially when alcohol is involved, not that I have any experience with those settings.



uncommondenominator
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 8 Aug 2019
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,316

14 Oct 2024, 3:01 pm

Seems to me it's less a matter of women over-analyzing, and more a matter of guys under-estimating or downplaying the impact of their behaviors - or failing to realize the issue to begin with.

Seems to me that it's a bit of a catch-22 to claim that you simply don't understand social nuances, but then also claim that you know for a fact you're not doing anything wrong, such that you're willing to then blame others for misunderstanding, rather than YOU misunderstanding, and your behavior being worse than you realize.



babybird
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 73,131
Location: UK

14 Oct 2024, 3:57 pm

Seems to me to be that you just can't do right for doing wrong sometimes

It's happened to me loads of times where I think I'm doing the right thing but according to the general consensus I'm actually doing wrong


_________________
We have existence


uncommondenominator
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 8 Aug 2019
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,316

Yesterday, 3:36 pm

(Addressing the room, and not any one single person, as this is a broad issue which many people seem to experience)

I mean, that's generally how that works - regardless of one's intent, if you do something wrong, you get the wrong result.

Which brings me back to a previous point - if y'all are so adamant that you don't understand social skills, then why are y'all so confident that you haven't done wrong?

The fact that you don't understand things like boundaries and socially acceptable behavior, to the degree where you not only cross boundaries, but continue to cross boundaries, and justify crossing boundaries, makes you look MORE of a risk, not less. You don't even see the issues with your behavior, and refuse to discontinue it, or even acknowledge that it's wrong.

The fact that when told you've acted improperly or hurt someone else, or made them uncomfortable or feel unsafe, your sole concern is how hurt you feel for being criticized, without a single care for the feelings of those you've hurt, makes you look more of a risk, not less. There's a difference between feeling bad for yourself, and feeling bad for them - the same way there's a difference between feeling sorry for your actions, and feeling sorry for getting caught.

Whenever I hear someone blame others for "misjudging" their "harmless eccentricities", it makes me think of people I've known who thought stalking wasn't stalking, just cos they're doing it to be "friendly" and not to be harmful - or think harassment isn't harassment just cos they're saying nice things instead of mean things. It doesn't matter whether you wanna kill them or love them - stalking is defined by persistent unwanted attention, not just negative or harmful attention. Your desire to bombard a woman with "love", despite her wishes, is still harassment. Even compliments can be harassment, if the person wants you to stop and leave them alone.

If your "harmless quirks" or "benign oddities" actually hurt other people, actually make them feel uncomfortable or unsafe, then they are not in fact harmless or benign, you're just dismissing the harm they're doing, because "you didn't MEAN to" or blaming the other person for being hyper-critical - which again, makes you sound more like a risk, not less, since you care more about your intent and your own feelings, than the actual harm you've caused to others.

More than that - as with threads like this, you not only care more about your own feelings than those of the people you've hurt, you then try to gaslight the world into believing that the problem isn't YOU for actually misbehaving - it's EVERYONE ELSE's fault for not just accepting your bad behavior and your excuses for it.



Canadian Freedom Lover
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

Joined: 16 Dec 2022
Age: 28
Gender: Male
Posts: 207
Location: Vancouver Canada

Today, 1:36 am

babybird wrote:
My intuition has probably saved my life on many occasions because unfortunately the most dangerous people are really good at hiding their red flags

For example when I was about 16 years old my intuition told me to get the hell away from a certain person who later on kidnapped, raped and tied up two of my friends and they had to escape from the persons property


I can't see that any red flags would have helped against this particular individual


I'm sorry to hear what happened to your friends when you were a teenager. I definitely agree that the most dangerous people are often actually very socially adept and are hard to spot via "red flags".



Canadian Freedom Lover
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

Joined: 16 Dec 2022
Age: 28
Gender: Male
Posts: 207
Location: Vancouver Canada

Today, 3:02 am

uncommondenominator wrote:
(Addressing the room, and not any one single person, as this is a broad issue which many people seem to experience)

I mean, that's generally how that works - regardless of one's intent, if you do something wrong, you get the wrong result.

Which brings me back to a previous point - if y'all are so adamant that you don't understand social skills, then why are y'all so confident that you haven't done wrong?

The fact that you don't understand things like boundaries and socially acceptable behavior, to the degree where you not only cross boundaries, but continue to cross boundaries, and justify crossing boundaries, makes you look MORE of a risk, not less. You don't even see the issues with your behavior, and refuse to discontinue it, or even acknowledge that it's wrong.

The fact that when told you've acted improperly or hurt someone else, or made them uncomfortable or feel unsafe, your sole concern is how hurt you feel for being criticized, without a single care for the feelings of those you've hurt, makes you look more of a risk, not less. There's a difference between feeling bad for yourself, and feeling bad for them - the same way there's a difference between feeling sorry for your actions, and feeling sorry for getting caught.

Whenever I hear someone blame others for "misjudging" their "harmless eccentricities", it makes me think of people I've known who thought stalking wasn't stalking, just cos they're doing it to be "friendly" and not to be harmful - or think harassment isn't harassment just cos they're saying nice things instead of mean things. It doesn't matter whether you wanna kill them or love them - stalking is defined by persistent unwanted attention, not just negative or harmful attention. Your desire to bombard a woman with "love", despite her wishes, is still harassment. Even compliments can be harassment, if the person wants you to stop and leave them alone.

If your "harmless quirks" or "benign oddities" actually hurt other people, actually make them feel uncomfortable or unsafe, then they are not in fact harmless or benign, you're just dismissing the harm they're doing, because "you didn't MEAN to" or blaming the other person for being hyper-critical - which again, makes you sound more like a risk, not less, since you care more about your intent and your own feelings, than the actual harm you've caused to others.

More than that - as with threads like this, you not only care more about your own feelings than those of the people you've hurt, you then try to gaslight the world into believing that the problem isn't YOU for actually misbehaving - it's EVERYONE ELSE's fault for not just accepting your bad behavior and your excuses for it.


Well, what on earth are the socially awkward among supposed to do? Maybe we should all lock ourselves in a bell tower and only come out at night like Quasimodo, because our lack of social skill are liable to offend someone.



QuantumChemist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Oct 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,000
Location: Midwest

Today, 8:20 am

Canadian Freedom Lover wrote:
uncommondenominator wrote:
(Addressing the room, and not any one single person, as this is a broad issue which many people seem to experience)

I mean, that's generally how that works - regardless of one's intent, if you do something wrong, you get the wrong result.

Which brings me back to a previous point - if y'all are so adamant that you don't understand social skills, then why are y'all so confident that you haven't done wrong?

The fact that you don't understand things like boundaries and socially acceptable behavior, to the degree where you not only cross boundaries, but continue to cross boundaries, and justify crossing boundaries, makes you look MORE of a risk, not less. You don't even see the issues with your behavior, and refuse to discontinue it, or even acknowledge that it's wrong.

The fact that when told you've acted improperly or hurt someone else, or made them uncomfortable or feel unsafe, your sole concern is how hurt you feel for being criticized, without a single care for the feelings of those you've hurt, makes you look more of a risk, not less. There's a difference between feeling bad for yourself, and feeling bad for them - the same way there's a difference between feeling sorry for your actions, and feeling sorry for getting caught.

Whenever I hear someone blame others for "misjudging" their "harmless eccentricities", it makes me think of people I've known who thought stalking wasn't stalking, just cos they're doing it to be "friendly" and not to be harmful - or think harassment isn't harassment just cos they're saying nice things instead of mean things. It doesn't matter whether you wanna kill them or love them - stalking is defined by persistent unwanted attention, not just negative or harmful attention. Your desire to bombard a woman with "love", despite her wishes, is still harassment. Even compliments can be harassment, if the person wants you to stop and leave them alone.

If your "harmless quirks" or "benign oddities" actually hurt other people, actually make them feel uncomfortable or unsafe, then they are not in fact harmless or benign, you're just dismissing the harm they're doing, because "you didn't MEAN to" or blaming the other person for being hyper-critical - which again, makes you sound more like a risk, not less, since you care more about your intent and your own feelings, than the actual harm you've caused to others.

More than that - as with threads like this, you not only care more about your own feelings than those of the people you've hurt, you then try to gaslight the world into believing that the problem isn't YOU for actually misbehaving - it's EVERYONE ELSE's fault for not just accepting your bad behavior and your excuses for it.


Well, what on earth are the socially awkward among supposed to do? Maybe we should all lock ourselves in a bell tower and only come out at night like Quasimodo, because our lack of social skill are liable to offend someone.


I prefer to lock myself away in a laboratory setting much more than a bell tower. At least I can get some work done there.

Ten years ago, I would often frequent a local pub for their food specials. The chef made a great French dip sandwich for a cheap price. Well, I would sit in one of the booths and quietly work on calculations for my research projects. I was friends with the owners of the pub, so they did not mind me being quirky.

People who came to drink would often come up to question me about what I was doing. They would call me creepy and nerdy because I was not drinking alcohol. Often I would just ignore them and they would go away. Once I got asked for my underwear by a very drunk lady from a bridal party (I politely declined). She could not believe that I said no, but I did. Her party loudly shamed me for turning them down, so I left to go home before my food arrived.

I stopped going there after being harassed several times by a particular trio of drunk women who would not leave me alone. They were angry that someone could ignore them in the pub. I was not interested in socializing, I just wanted to eat my food and do calculations. These experiences showed me that I am on an entirely different social wavelength than others, so I am better off locked in my lab to be honest.



uncommondenominator
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 8 Aug 2019
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,316

Today, 3:49 pm

Canadian Freedom Lover wrote:
Well, what on earth are the socially awkward among supposed to do? Maybe we should all lock ourselves in a bell tower and only come out at night like Quasimodo, because our lack of social skill are liable to offend someone.


TY for promptly demonstrating my point. Boo hoo poor you, never mind the people you've HURT. Not "offended", HURT. Y'all keep massively playing that part down, and refuse to accept the consequences of your actions.

Quasimodo was disfigured, not dangerous. Looks can't harm people. Behaviors can harm people. Accidental behaviors can harm people. Unintentional behaviors can harm people. A lack of social skills which causes someone to act inappropriately without realizing it, can harm people. Comparing the discomfort resulting from a severe appearance is NOTHING like the HARM which can result from one's ACTIONS.

Your looks don't reflect your character - assuming bad looks = bad character is an attribution error, as these things are not connected. Your actions and behaviors do reflect your character, and as such, judging you by them is NOT an attribution error, as they ARE connected. Just cos your bad behavior has an identifiable root cause doesn't make it cease to be bad behavior, and doesn't justify the bad behavior either.

Y'all keep acting like all you do is goofy silly stuff like say "you too!" when the waiter says "enjoy your meal", or act a little fidgety with inconsistent eye-contact. It's actually stuff like not respecting boundaries, failure to even understand boundaries, consistently crossing boundaries, and when told, denying you've done wrong and refusing to take accountability.

And any time y'all are criticized, rather than accepting and learning from your mistakes, you throw guilt-laden tirades about being "forced into isolation, beaten into compliance, bullied into conformity" - which is just a really dramatic way of saying "made to behave in an acceptable manner instead of doing whatever I want".

If you aren't happy with the outcomes of your behavior, CHANGE YOUR BEHAVIOR. But you wont, cos you don't even think you're doing anything wrong, and blame everyone else - which again, is the biggest issue of all.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,706
Location: Stendec

Today, 5:44 pm

Canadian Freedom Lover wrote:
. . . what on earth are the socially awkward among supposed to do?
Learn how to be less socially awkward, or at least turn your awkwardness into a comedy routine.


_________________
 
No love for Hamas, Hezbollah, Iranian Leadership, Islamic Jihad, other Islamic terrorist groups, OR their supporters and sympathizers.


TwilightPrincess
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Sep 2016
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 26,821
Location: Hell

Today, 6:11 pm

I think the problem is more about behaving in ways that could make others feel uncomfortable, unsafe, or threatened. A lot of women find social awkwardness charming. The issue is more about crossing or not respecting boundaries. I don’t care if someone is aware or not; if they invade my personal space, follow me around, or stare, I’m not going to be interested, and I will find them creepy. If someone’s social awkwardness translates into nonthreatening behavior (e.g. stumbling over words, atypical eye contact, or seeming a little odd/nervous), I might find it charming or, at least, not off-putting.

What can one do? Find out what the issue is and work on it. I think we’re all capable of improving our social skills, especially if there’s some awareness that there’s a problem. Hopefully, we wouldn’t want to make people feel uncomfortable or unsafe.



bee33
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Apr 2008
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,415

Today, 9:15 pm

uncommondenominator wrote:

If you aren't happy with the outcomes of your behavior, CHANGE YOUR BEHAVIOR. But you wont, cos you don't even think you're doing anything wrong, and blame everyone else - which again, is the biggest issue of all.

I think there's some truth to this, but it seems to me the problem is that some men on the spectrum are unable to see or understand what is problematic about their behavior, let alone know how to change it. The only option that remains is to withdraw and just not engage with anyone, especially women, ever, and that is a very sad outcome. The challenge is for both sides to give a little and for society not to condemn every little misstep, while the socially awkward try to work on not being intrusive. It's a difficult challenge, but most of the time the onus only falls on one side: the awkward having to do better, even if they can't, while everyone else wags their finger at them.