Supreme Court allows Virginia to purge voter rolls
Page 1 of 1 [ 1 post ]
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,628
Location: Long Island, New York
Quote:
The Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed Republican officials in Virginia to revive a plan aimed at removing noncitizen voters from the rolls ahead of next week’s election.
The justices blocked a federal judge’s ruling that put the program on hold and required the state to restore 1,600 voters to the rolls.
The brief order noted that the three liberal justices on the court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, all dissented.
"This is a victory for commonsense and election fairness," Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin, a Republican who announced the plan in August, said in a statement.
"Virginians can cast their ballots on Election Day knowing that Virginia’s elections are fair, secure, and free from politically-motivated interference," he added.
Virginia has same-day voter registration meaning that any eligible voter who was removed from the rolls should still be able to vote on Election Day or during the early voting period that ends on Nov. 2.
Civil rights groups, backed by the Biden administration, challenged the plan, saying it had led to some legal voters being removed from the rolls, too. The Justice Department said that while states can review its voter rolls, it cannot do so right before an election.
"The department brought this suit to ensure that every eligible American citizen can vote in our elections. We disagree with the Supreme Court's order," a Justice Department spokesperson said.
States are barred from systematically removing people from voters rolls within 90 days of an election under the National Voter Registration Act.
The state's plan flagged people for removal if they check a box on a Department of Motor Vehicles form declaring they are not a citizen or if they leave it blank.
Groups that sued, including the Virginia Coalition for Immigrant Rights, said the process drew in people who might have indicated they were not citizens at that time but have subsequently become U.S. citizens. Civil rights groups and the Biden administration both provided evidence of U.S. citizens who had likely been removed from the rolls as a result.
“This ruling is devastating for Virginia voters because we are essentially allowing eligible voters to be stripped of their fundamental rights,” said Joan Porte, president of the League of Women Voters of Virginia, which was one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit.
“The Supreme Court should be protecting voters from disenfranchisement but instead they are allowing an illegal purge of eligible voters,” she added.
In court papers, the groups said that "the record makes clear that citizens are being removed from the voter rolls." These are voters the 90-day period is "designed to protect," they added.
The justices blocked a federal judge’s ruling that put the program on hold and required the state to restore 1,600 voters to the rolls.
The brief order noted that the three liberal justices on the court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, all dissented.
"This is a victory for commonsense and election fairness," Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin, a Republican who announced the plan in August, said in a statement.
"Virginians can cast their ballots on Election Day knowing that Virginia’s elections are fair, secure, and free from politically-motivated interference," he added.
Virginia has same-day voter registration meaning that any eligible voter who was removed from the rolls should still be able to vote on Election Day or during the early voting period that ends on Nov. 2.
Civil rights groups, backed by the Biden administration, challenged the plan, saying it had led to some legal voters being removed from the rolls, too. The Justice Department said that while states can review its voter rolls, it cannot do so right before an election.
"The department brought this suit to ensure that every eligible American citizen can vote in our elections. We disagree with the Supreme Court's order," a Justice Department spokesperson said.
States are barred from systematically removing people from voters rolls within 90 days of an election under the National Voter Registration Act.
The state's plan flagged people for removal if they check a box on a Department of Motor Vehicles form declaring they are not a citizen or if they leave it blank.
Groups that sued, including the Virginia Coalition for Immigrant Rights, said the process drew in people who might have indicated they were not citizens at that time but have subsequently become U.S. citizens. Civil rights groups and the Biden administration both provided evidence of U.S. citizens who had likely been removed from the rolls as a result.
“This ruling is devastating for Virginia voters because we are essentially allowing eligible voters to be stripped of their fundamental rights,” said Joan Porte, president of the League of Women Voters of Virginia, which was one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit.
“The Supreme Court should be protecting voters from disenfranchisement but instead they are allowing an illegal purge of eligible voters,” she added.
In court papers, the groups said that "the record makes clear that citizens are being removed from the voter rolls." These are voters the 90-day period is "designed to protect," they added.
_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity
“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman
Page 1 of 1 [ 1 post ]
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Trump Voter Caught Cheating and Arrested |
28 Oct 2024, 4:53 pm |
Court |
Today, 6:07 am |
Russian court fines Google more than world’s GDP |
Yesterday, 9:39 pm |