Not me.
And if I'm being one, it's not inherent in my nature to be.
If I'm annoyed with any opinions, then at that moment I'm likely annoyed about everything.
Rebellious as I might've, I'm also can be reasoned with provided I'm at a regulated state.
So...
If I'm being a contrarian, it's likely just me being unnecessarily reactive most of the time.
Not all the time because there are rare instances that certain views DO genuinely annoy me regardless of my tolerance level.
My true conscious preference is to be flexible, adaptable, see where people are coming from, what their reasoning is and contexts are.
Most opinions that I don't agree with if I'm not dysregulated would not be annoyance and thoughts of disagreement or reflexibly in place of ego and comparisons, but either in curiousity, in entertainment, in pity, in derision, or just flat out nothing because they reasonably mean nothing to me.