Trump team fully embraces RFK Jr.'s vaccine skepticism

Post Reply New Topic

WiFi causes... leaky brain. What is leaky brain?

It's when there's leaks that let worms come in and eat your brain.

ShwaggyD-
While my dad had never been diagnosed in life, I have no doubt he had been on the spectrum. As he had been born in 1923 in rural eastern Washington - a time and place only a decade or two removed from the old west - he hadn't been vaccinated for anything. No, he just got ungodly sick from an assortment of childhood ailments that vaccines today easily take care of. And yet, as I already stated, I believe he was still autistic.

WiFi causes... leaky brain. What is leaky brain?

You realize, don't you, that aluminum is a very common element on Earth. We cannot help but absorb it into our bodies.

Also, I think that it is well known that high levels of aluminum are correlated with one or more types of dementia.

One real question should be "Does the aluminum cause the condition or does the condition make us more likely to absorb and store aluminum?" It is just as crazy to assume one side or the other.

Abstract
Aluminum and mercury are environmentally ubiquitous. Individually they are both neurotoxic elements with shared neuro-pathogenic pathways: oxidative stress, altered neurotransmission, and disruption of the neuroendocrine and immune systems. In the infant, Al and Hg differ in type of exposure, absorption, distribution (brain access), and metabolism. In environmentally associated exposure (breast milk and infant formulas) their co-occurrences fluctuate randomly, but in Thimerosal-containing vaccines (TCVs) they occur combined in a proprietary ratio; in these cases, low-doses of Thimerosal-ethylmercury (EtHg) and adjuvant-Al present the most widespread binary mixture in less developed countries. Although experimental studies at low doses of the binary Hg and Al mixture are rare, when studied individually they have been shown to affect neurological outcomes negatively. In in vitro systems, comparative neurotoxicity between Al and Hg varies in relation to the measured parameters but seems less for Al than for Hg. While neurotoxicity of environmental Hg (mainly fish methyl-Hg, MeHg) is associated with neurobehavioral outcomes in children, environmental Al is not associated, except in certain clinical conditions. Therefore, the issues of their neurotoxic effects (singly or combined) are discussed. In the infant (up to six months) the organic-Hg and Al body burdens from a full TCV schedule are estimated to reach levels higher than that originating from breastfeeding or from high aluminum soy-based formulas. Despite worldwide exposure to both Al and Hg (inorganic Hg, MeHg, and Thimerosal/EtHg), our knowledge on this combined exposure is insufficient to predict their combined neurotoxic effects (and with other co-occurring neurotoxicants).

My Grandmother was never diagnosed, but I am no doubt she was an aspie, as is my mother. Neither were vaccinated as infants or small children, yet both were aspie. Grandma told me stories that support the truth about growing up back when she born in 1917; that they lived in unsanitary conditions 24/7 that increased health risks.

I don't believe ALL autism is caused by vaccines, environmental toxins, or anything like that. I believe that the old aspies are part of our human evolutionary chain and thus an integral and important part of humanities growth. These people pass on these genetic 'upgrades' on their children who pass them on and so on.

When we see some of the level 3 type autistics I sometimes cry inside because I can see their autism isn't the same as mine in any real way except being in the brain. I have seen through a relatives eyes the very real and drastic change that can happen to a young child soon after getting vaccinated. It is obvious to me in ways hard to explain that their autism isn't part of evolution, but because of the arrogance and ignorance of man.

I believe the only reason why there's more diagnosis of autism today is because we have a better understanding that it exists on a spectrum rather than one sort of severe disability. I have to side with legitimate science on this.

Leaky Brain Syndrome refers to a condition where the blood-brain barrier, a protective barrier that separates the bloodstream from the brain, becomes more permeable than usual. This heightened permeability allows substances that would normally be blocked, such as toxins and pathogens, to enter the brain tissue.

Thank you for providing a real definition.

If karma was real RFK would catch a preventable disease and be deleted from the census.

There is no incentive for scientists and researchers to investigate whether vaccines cause autism. Merely asking the question causes scientists and health care professionals to be ostracized by their peers. However, there are a few instances where scientists have gone against the grain and compared health outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated populations.
While mainstream narratives are quick to dismiss any connection, several studies published over the past decade present compelling statistical evidence suggesting a strong correlation between vaccines and autism diagnoses. These studies, often suppressed or ignored, are now sparking debate about the negative effects of vaccines on child health.

This research is just the beginning. The vaccine-autism connection is about to go mainstream. The brilliant Steven Kirsch has compiled over 300 documents, voice-recordings, emails, hand-written notes, diagrams and data, proving that we’ve all been lied to and there is a serious connection between autism and vaccines.

Here are SEVEN studies that have been ignored by the corporate media and the medical establishment:

The Paul Thomas study
One of the most striking studies was conducted by Dr. Paul Thomas in 2020. Thomas examined the health outcomes of 561 unvaccinated children, finding zero cases of autism among them. In contrast, among 894 children who followed the CDC-recommended vaccination schedule, 15 cases of autism were documented. With a p-value of 0.0008, the results were statistically significant, revealing an extraordinary disparity between the two groups. The odds ratio (OR) was calculated as infinity, with a 95% confidence interval suggesting a high likelihood that the vaccinated group faced significantly higher risks of autism. The vaccinated children were also more likely to struggle with a host of other chronic health issues, including asthma, developmental delays, reoccurring ear infections, chronic sinusitis, etc.

Although the study was later retracted after critics argued that increased autism rates could be attributed to more frequent doctor visits in the vaccinated group, this claim was later disproved by further research from Lyons-Weiler and Blaylock. Still, the retraction left many wondering about the motivations behind the coverup. Supporters of Thomas argue that the findings were suppressed because they did not align with the prevailing narrative that vaccines are safe and effective.

Interestingly, Thomas's pioneering research is now being replicated by pediatricians across the country. Liz Mumper reduced the incidence of autism in her practice six-fold by simply limiting the number of vaccines given to children.

The Generation Rescue study
In 2007, the Generation Rescue (GR) study, which looked at the health outcomes of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children, also found that vaccinated children fared worse in every category tested. Despite being a small study funded with minimal resources, the results raised serious concerns about the safety of vaccines, prompting the organization to question why similar studies have not been conducted on a larger scale by institutions like the CDC.

GR’s study, which was conducted by a third-party survey firm to ensure unbiased results, found significant differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated children, including higher rates of autism, allergies, and other chronic health issues in the vaccinated group.

"We surveyed over 9,000 boys in California and Oregon and found that vaccinated boys had a 155% greater chance of having a neurological disorder like ADHD or autism than unvaccinated boys" the study authors reported in June 2007. The study’s findings, however, have never been replicated by government agencies, and critics argue that the lack of follow-up studies on the issue is suspicious.

Hooker's and Mawson's research
Another key study, led by Dr. Brian Hooker and Neil Miller in 2021, found a 5.03 times higher odds ratio for autism in vaccinated children compared to their unvaccinated peers. Hooker’s research reignited concerns over the safety of vaccines, particularly given the increasing rates of autism diagnoses in recent decades. Hooker’s study, alongside another by Dr. Tony Mawson in 2017, also found an increased risk of autism among vaccinated children, with Mawson's study reporting a 4.2 odds ratio for autism in vaccinated children. Mawson's latest dataset (not yet published) includes a much larger dataset (50,000 children) and shows the same odds ratios for chronic diseases in the vaccinated children.

Perhaps the most alarming aspect of these studies is that they seem to challenge data from larger institutions like the CDC, which continue to affirm the safety of vaccines. Hooker’s findings in particular led to his access being revoked by the CDC, further fueling suspicions about transparency and data manipulation within government agencies.

The Garner control group study
In 2022, Dr. Paul Garner and colleagues published a groundbreaking study that revealed an astonishing 82 times higher odds ratio for autism in vaccinated children compared to unvaccinated children. This study, which involved a large control group, found that among children who had zero exposure to vaccines, the rate of autism was effectively zero. Garner's team conducted a comprehensive analysis using data from 10,000 children, finding a statistically significant association between vaccinations and autism, with a confidence interval ranging from 5.12 to 1315.

The findings of Garner's study were particularly noteworthy because they aligned with those of the Control Group study, a long-running research initiative focused on unvaccinated children. Researchers noted that the Control Group’s data showed not only lower autism rates but also better health outcomes across a range of conditions.

Together, these studies point to the simple truth -- vaccines do have a major role in the autism epidemic. And, vax freedom leads to fewer health issues in children, including autism.