ASA regulator bans advert for mocking Virgin Mary

Page 1 of 1 [ 3 posts ] 

blitzkrieg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jun 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,492
Location: United Kingdom

Yesterday, 7:21 am

I find it interesting that 'free speech' is often given as a reason for espousing hateful rhetoric towards Christianity, even when that speech is often an expression of hatred and causes offence on the grounds of religion to those affected.

These same sorts of people who commit this sort of hateful speech with regards to religion, often seem to be aware that it is not okay to express mocking or disrespect towards other groups who have protected characteristics, such as those as part of the LGBTQ+ community, or people of a different ethnic background, or those who have disabilities? And yet they often seem to make an exception for religion, despite it being a lawfully protected characteristic.

Quote from the article:

Quote:
The advert depicted the Scottish comic as the Virgin Mary, squirting breast milk into the mouth of a kneeling priest alongside the tour’s title, “I Gave You Milk to Drink”.

The ASA launched an investigation after the advert was placed on the Sky News website.

Its ruling found that it was “likely to be seen as mocking the religious figures shown” and also “likely to cause serious offence to some within the Christian faith who saw the ad on the site”.

Mary, the mother of Jesus, is revered by all Christians but is especially venerated by Roman Catholics.

Brady, 38, was also warned by the regulator “to not cause offence on the grounds of religion in future ads”, the ruling said.


https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/11/23/free-speech-row-regulator-bans-advert-mocking-virgin-mary/



Devoted
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

Joined: 9 Aug 2024
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 30

Today, 1:03 am

blitzkrieg wrote:
I find it interesting that 'free speech' is often given as a reason for espousing hateful rhetoric towards Christianity, even when that speech is often an expression of hatred and causes offence on the grounds of religion to those affected.

These same sorts of people who commit this sort of hateful speech with regards to religion, often seem to be aware that it is not okay to express mocking or disrespect towards other groups who have protected characteristics, such as those as part of the LGBTQ+ community, or people of a different ethnic background, or those who have disabilities? And yet they often seem to make an exception for religion, despite it being a lawfully protected characteristic.


We have similar illogical/inconsistent attitudes here in the USA. It's socially acceptable to attack Christianity (especially Catholicism), and has been, for quite some time. As a member of the faithful, I like to keep in mind that....

Two thousand years ago, Christianity revolutionized the world, by proclaiming that all people are valuable in the eyes of God, not just the wealthy, those in good health, and those who hold positions of power. We are called to continue the ancient Christian traditions of feeding the hungry; clothing the naked; caring for the sick, widows, and orphans; embracing life, compassion, and hospitality for the unborn, the disabled, and the stranger; loving our neighbors, etc. We have good work to do, this side of Heaven, and we cannot let cruel words, attitudes, and actions distract or discourage us.

Gotta stay focused and keep our eyes on The Cross.



JamesW
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

Joined: 26 Jan 2023
Gender: Male
Posts: 343

Today, 4:47 am

blitzkrieg wrote:
I find it interesting that 'free speech' is often given as a reason for espousing hateful rhetoric towards Christianity


I find it appalling that 'free speech' is always given as an excuse for espousing hateful rhetoric towards anything.