Page 1 of 1 [ 7 posts ] 

Jamesy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Oct 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,415
Location: Near London United Kingdom

Today, 8:18 am

When I was 17 in college I got into a debate with my mom about my unwillingness to dating people I am not attracted to. My mom said in regards to that "Some people are willing to compromise"

Do you think my mother made a fair point or not?



babybird
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 75,854
Location: UK

Today, 8:45 am

I'm thinking your mother could have expanded on her statement


_________________
We have existence


Nades
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 8 Jan 2017
Age: 1934
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,038
Location: wales

Today, 2:56 pm

Jamesy wrote:
When I was 17 in college I got into a debate with my mom about my unwillingness to dating people I am not attracted to. My mom said in regards to that "Some people are willing to compromise"

Do you think my mother made a fair point or not?


Yes, she made a fair point. Nobody is truly a perfect match.



123autism
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

Joined: 13 Oct 2024
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 207

Today, 3:23 pm

Jamesy wrote:
When I was 17 in college I got into a debate with my mom about my unwillingness to dating people I am not attracted to. My mom said in regards to that "Some people are willing to compromise"

Do you think my mother made a fair point or not?


Seriously?

Why would you worry about this when it happened so long ago?

I think what she may have been saying is that some people will date people they aren't completely attracted to for
the sake of being in a relationship. Maybe they are lonely and feel a need to be with someone.



Gentleman Argentum
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Aug 2019
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 997
Location: State of Euphoria

Today, 6:45 pm

Jamesy wrote:
When I was 17 in college I got into a debate with my mom about my unwillingness to dating people I am not attracted to. My mom said in regards to that "Some people are willing to compromise"

Do you think my mother made a fair point or not?


That is all fine in theory but the problem arises when something else does not arise.

You see, lack of attraction is a serious problem for a male, because it means he cannot perform, and will not enjoy the act of sex.

It is not as big a deal for the female, because she can just lie there, and think about what she is going to cook for dinner. So for a female, attraction to the male is not as important, she can get by and choose a mate based on material comforts, and that has been the traditional motive.


_________________
My magical motto is Animus facit nobilem. I like to read fantasy and weird fiction. Just a few of my favorite online things: music, chess, and dungeon crawl stone soup.


TwilightPrincess
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Sep 2016
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 29,616
Location: Hell

Today, 6:53 pm

Gentleman Argentum wrote:
You see, lack of attraction is a serious problem for a male, because it means he cannot perform, and will not enjoy the act of sex.

It is not as big a deal for the female, because she can just lie there, and think about what she is going to cook for dinner. So for a female, attraction to the male is not as important, she can get by and choose a mate based on material comforts, and that has been the traditional motive.

Right, because women only lie there during sex and cook all the meals./s

This ain’t the 1950s.

Women like sex as much as men do. If I’m just lying there thinking about what I’m cooking for dinner, then (continued) sex is a no go.

Arousal is a big deal for men, women, and any other gender. Sex when a woman isn’t turned on can happen, but it doesn’t feel good and may even hurt.

Given that women can provide for themselves these days, “material comforts” are also not so high up on our lists of priorities. I’m speaking in a general sense. As with any other gender or demographic, our preferences vary drastically from person to person, but in general, we care less about that than is often believed.


_________________
“Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven.” — Satan and TwilightPrincess


TwilightPrincess
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Sep 2016
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 29,616
Location: Hell

Today, 7:22 pm

Jamesy wrote:
When I was 17 in college I got into a debate with my mom about my unwillingness to dating people I am not attracted to. My mom said in regards to that "Some people are willing to compromise"

Do you think my mother made a fair point or not?

I think sometimes people unnecessarily limit their options. For instance, if you think you’re only attracted to someone with a certain hair color, you could miss out on someone great for you who has a different hair color.

That’s an extreme example, but it does work like that sometimes. Do you think your standards were unnecessarily limiting when you were 17? Sometimes TV can make us have unrealistic expectations when it comes to stuff like body type or whatever else.

There’s nothing wrong with being attracted to whoever you’re attracted to (within reason), but it could unnecessarily limit your options if you’re too rigid about it. That’s where adjusting your expectations could lead to more happiness overall.


_________________
“Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven.” — Satan and TwilightPrincess