cyberdora wrote:
Cornflake wrote:
cyberdora wrote:
You'd be surprised who was goosestepping and throwing Nazi salutes
Typical Murdoch rag looking for muck to rake over. Then
80 year old muck in this case.
See -
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-33578174the BBC article seems to suggest the picture presented by the Sun newspaper was misleading and dishonest.
The
opening paragraphs, the
first words, state:
BBC News wrote:
Buckingham Palace has said it is disappointed that footage from 1933 showing the Queen performing a Nazi salute has been released.
The Sun has published the film, which shows the Queen aged about seven, with her mother, sister and uncle.
The palace said it was "disappointing that film, shot eight decades ago... has been obtained and exploited".
The newspaper has refused to say how it got the footage but said it was an "important and interesting story".
That's a strange way to start an article if the BBC thinks the picture
itself is misleading and dishonest.
In fact the complaint was that the
usage of the image was misleading and dishonest, as indeed it was.
I'm not sure what point you're trying to make about a snapshot in time from (then) 80-odd years ago - it seems rather too much like an "ooh, reds under the bed!!" scare, and particularly when viewed in relation to the wartime record of the royal family. (Edward is of course another issue).
So unlike the idiot manchild Musk with his long and continuing support of extreme right-wing nastiness, this typically grubby attempt of
The Sun to expose a "royal scandal" simply doesn't hold water.
Quote:
I would not be so quick to sweep this under the carpet as it indicates how pervasive the influence of the Nazis was over the british royals even if Elizabeth can't be held accountable for her actions because she was too young.
You know, when every single gesture/expression/interest is examined in atomic detail in the expectation of finding something, something will be found.
Whether it's relevant or even true is another matter.