zekeboy wrote:
I'm afraid not, Mx. Also, this is exactly why I wanted a "yes" or "no" answer. It was a question related to a very sensitive topic, and I expected fights to start if I didn't clarify that.
Several of the answers have explained elements of why the responses were 'aggressive'. This one addresses a lot of it:
TwilightPrincess wrote:
What goal did you have in mind with this thread? My thoughts: this specific forum is mostly about support and discussion for LGBT members. Being against homosexual marriage and gay sex is homophobic and would be inappropriate for this forum. If folks are denied the same rights as others due to race, sexual orientation, gender identity, etc., that’s bigotry in action. It would be like people posting in Women’s Discussion that it would be okay for women to not have the same rights that men do. I don’t think a thread there titled “Can a man be an ally but be against women voting and equal pay?” would go over very well and certainly not if anyone posted “yes.”
This isn’t about politics or philosophical outlooks; it’s about human rights.
Essentially the question comes off as tonedeaf, how can someone possibly be an ally while also opposing one's basic rights? If somebody sees your rights and interests as inherently inferior to theirs, they're not an ally.
Most of the 'aggressive' answers are really just people expanding on why their answer is no and why the premise is inherently flawed. I don't really the aggression you're alluding to, I just see people fleshing out their answer to provide the reasoning behind it.
_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
You can't advance to the next level without stomping on a few Koopas.