CheckerboardStrangler wrote:
I do not believe in the concept of "masking" because from where I sit so far, it appears to be lying.
I certainly could be wrong, 100 percent wrong, but my policy is to just be real, be honest and be open to the world as much as is practical.
I do realize that the official definition is the conscious or unconscious actions of an autistic person trying to modify their behavior to appear more "neurotypical" but in the end it's almost never anything like that in practice, which is why I cannot buy into acceptance of it as a valid concept.
It's more wishful thinking and bad acting from what I can gather.
I don't see it as lying, it's more a natural process of adjusting to suit oneself to the environment. If growing up one receives a lot of negative feedback on one's behaviour, it's possible to learn how to suppress certain behaviours or divert them to avoid so many negative consequences, to protect oneself.
A basic ability to mask has been a godsend for me in enabling me to pursue a career. It gives me a bit of breathing space while a new employer still thinks I'm NT to be able to demonstrate my worth to the company, before they realise I'm different and they've got an autistic on their hands. By the time they realise, I might be past the probation period and harder to fire.
I'm betraying other autistics by doing this? I don't think so. It is actually educational for an employer to see that they have an autist in the books who can still fulfil the basic requirements of the job - and even perform better than NTs in some ways. My hope is that educating employers will help those who cannot mask to get work also.
And the tick analogy is gross.