Sean wrote:
The problem with sending food to the third world is that procreation is their national pastime- it's all they have to do.
oh sean, what tosh. there isn't a job centre where you can hire casual agricultural labour in the developing world, you know. neither is there the sort of medical care which guarantees survival of all kids., nor readily available contraception, especially in countries where the dear ol' pope says they couldn't use it anyway, or they go straight to hell (do not pass go, do not collect £200).
i'm all for the idea of "give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; teach a man to fish and you feed him for life". however, if the man is starving, give him the bloody fish, cos he won't be alive to learn tomorrow.
as for the countries where they send GM food aid, which then requires massive use of pesticides, herbicides, fertilisers, etc., etc., or may even be sterile, so they have to buy it again the next growing season... well, you can imagine how useful
that isn't.
these people are
starving, through no fault of their own - disasters like katrina don't just happen once in a lifetime, they happen every year (i'm talking drought, locust swarms etc., as well as hurricanes and floods). while we sit working ourselves into a tither, trying to decide what flavour of fizzy drink we should have, they are dying. yes, the solutions should be long term rather than short term. but, as i said, people have to be kept alive so that they can take on the responsibility for their own survival, with the support they really need.