Page 2 of 5 [ 78 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next


Choose wisely...
Colt M1911/45 11%  11%  [ 5 ]
Glock 17/18 4%  4%  [ 2 ]
Desert Eagle .50AE 2%  2%  [ 1 ]
.44 Magnum Revolver (any manufacturer) 4%  4%  [ 2 ]
MP5 or Uzi 2%  2%  [ 1 ]
P-90 Submachine gun 9%  9%  [ 4 ]
SA-80 Assault Rifle 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
M4 Carbine Assault Rifle (any variant) 11%  11%  [ 5 ]
M16 Assault Rifle (AV) 7%  7%  [ 3 ]
Thompson Submachine gun 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Dragnov SVD Sniper Rifle 4%  4%  [ 2 ]
M24 Sniper Rifle 4%  4%  [ 2 ]
M82A1 Sniper Rifle 4%  4%  [ 2 ]
Any Shotgun 7%  7%  [ 3 ]
Ak-47 Assault Rifle 20%  20%  [ 9 ]
Any Machine Gun 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Any Rocket Launcher 11%  11%  [ 5 ]
Total votes : 46

T-rav20
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jan 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,848
Location: South Jersey

26 Mar 2007, 3:08 am

Anubis wrote:
I choose an M4 Carbine, with a short barrel, digital scope(with night/infrared vision, underslung shotgun, detachable stock, and silencer. Has railings to make the additions changable and modular. Uses heavier bullets, giving it a heavier calbre and smaller clip capacity. [18]

I see that you're a tactical tupperware kind of guy. Since you like the M4 pattern I'd suggest an HK416 in .300 Whisper:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HK_416
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.300_Whisper
It does away with the idiotic direct gas impingement with something that actually works, and (should) be easily rechambered in .300 Wh with just a barrel change. As for the rest of it, good luck, all the Tac gear in the world can't replace a good head on your shoulders and a solid skillset. I'd put my Springfield '03 and S&W Model 27 (.357 mag) up against your gear any day of the week.


_________________
Ceterum autem censeo, Carthaginem esse delendam

The following statement is True, the preceding statement was False.

I'm A PINEY from my head down to my HINEY.


Last edited by T-rav20 on 26 Mar 2007, 3:19 am, edited 1 time in total.

SamuraiSaxen
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2006
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,465
Location: Mexico

26 Mar 2007, 3:13 am

Ak-47 for me!



Quatermass
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 18,779
Location: Right behind you...

26 Mar 2007, 3:22 am

For close up work, either a tranquiliser gun (like the Beretta M9 or the Mk29 from the Metal Gear Solid series), or where I have to kill, a Desert Eagle. From a distance, I'd say a semi-automatic sniper rifle. An SVD is a semi, innit? If not, well, whatever, as long as it can be chambered for both normal and tranquiliser rounds. Acessories? Well, a decent safety and modified for extra rounds would be good.

Of course, I'd say a gunblade (like the Velvet Nightmare), but this seems to be a discussion on real weapons. I'd also choose a Monroe Magnum if it was feasible and real.


_________________
(No longer a mod)

On sabbatical...


T-rav20
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jan 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,848
Location: South Jersey

26 Mar 2007, 3:34 am

Quatermass wrote:
either a tranquiliser gun...and tranquiliser rounds... but this seems to be a discussion on real weapons.

Exactly, and there's no such thing as 'tranquilliser rounds' just CS gas, bean bag rounds, and tasers, though I suppose you could chase after people with a needle full of amytal.


_________________
Ceterum autem censeo, Carthaginem esse delendam

The following statement is True, the preceding statement was False.

I'm A PINEY from my head down to my HINEY.


calandale
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,439

26 Mar 2007, 4:09 am

Well, flamethrowers and rocket launchers aren't technically weapons. They're also too limited, as well. If I had to go with something currently produced, I'd take a nice ICBM. But, I'd like a larger effect, so if I can, I want to choose a nice hunk of rock to hurtle into the sun at say .8c. That should take out all life here.



T-rav20
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jan 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,848
Location: South Jersey

26 Mar 2007, 4:22 am

calandale wrote:
Well, flamethrowers and rocket launchers aren't technically weapons. They're also too limited, as well. If I had to go with something currently produced, I'd take a nice ICBM. But, I'd like a larger effect, so if I can, I want to choose a nice hunk of rock to hurtle into the sun at say .8c. That should take out all life here.

Nice to see some big thinkers... :roll:


_________________
Ceterum autem censeo, Carthaginem esse delendam

The following statement is True, the preceding statement was False.

I'm A PINEY from my head down to my HINEY.


CrimsonEdge
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2007
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 879
Location: not here

26 Mar 2007, 4:37 am

Desert Eagle. 8)



calandale
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,439

26 Mar 2007, 4:46 am

T-rav20 wrote:
Nice to see some big thinkers... :roll:


never go into a fight with too small a weapon.



T-rav20
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jan 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,848
Location: South Jersey

26 Mar 2007, 4:53 am

calandale wrote:
T-rav20 wrote:
Nice to see some big thinkers... :roll:


never go into a fight with too small a weapon.

True, The first rule of gunfighting is have a gun, the biggest gun you can carry without tripping over it. I'm not sure if a big rock qualifies, but it may render the entire question moot.


_________________
Ceterum autem censeo, Carthaginem esse delendam

The following statement is True, the preceding statement was False.

I'm A PINEY from my head down to my HINEY.


Anubis
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Sep 2006
Age: 136
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,911
Location: Mount Herculaneum/England

26 Mar 2007, 6:53 am

T-rav20 wrote:
Anubis wrote:
I choose an M4 Carbine, with a short barrel, digital scope(with night/infrared vision, underslung shotgun, detachable stock, and silencer. Has railings to make the additions changable and modular. Uses heavier bullets, giving it a heavier calbre and smaller clip capacity. [18]

I see that you're a tactical tupperware kind of guy. Since you like the M4 pattern I'd suggest an HK416 in .300 Whisper:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HK_416
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.300_Whisper
It does away with the idiotic direct gas impingement with something that actually works, and (should) be easily rechambered in .300 Wh with just a barrel change. As for the rest of it, good luck, all the Tac gear in the world can't replace a good head on your shoulders and a solid skillset. I'd put my Springfield '03 and S&W Model 27 (.357 mag) up against your gear any day of the week.


Tbh, I like the F2000 with plenty of equipment better. F2000, with heavy calibre, an altered firing mechanism which means- (look at my idea below) all that gear, dual colt.45s, and of course armour and equipment.


Caseless bullets, which are magnetic, and have a small charge which is in the back of the round. When the pin hits it, it blows, and the bullet is propelled forward. Gas firing is replaced by spring firing, using kinetic energy to repeat the pin firing until the trigger is released.


_________________
Lalalalai.... I'll cut you up!


T-rav20
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jan 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,848
Location: South Jersey

26 Mar 2007, 7:01 am

Anubis wrote:
Caseless bullets, which are magnetic, and have a small charge which is in the back of the round. When the pin hits it, it blows, and the bullet is propelled forward. Gas firing is replaced by spring firing, using kinetic energy to repeat the pin firing until the trigger is released.

The M16/M4 would be completely impractical for converting to caseless ammunition, besides there's already a better rifle out there...
http://www.hkpro.com/g11.htm
Except for the tiny caliber, this would be my ideal battle rifle.


_________________
Ceterum autem censeo, Carthaginem esse delendam

The following statement is True, the preceding statement was False.

I'm A PINEY from my head down to my HINEY.


Last edited by T-rav20 on 26 Mar 2007, 9:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

TruenoBlues
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 813
Location: Oswego, IL

26 Mar 2007, 10:44 am

T-rav20 wrote:
Anubis wrote:
Caseless bullets, which are magnetic, and have a small charge which is in the back of the round. When the pin hits it, it blows, and the bullet is propelled forward. Gas firing is replaced by spring firing, using kinetic energy to repeat the pin firing until the trigger is released.

The M16/M4 could be completely impractical for converting to caseless ammunition, besides there's already a better rifle out there...
http://www.hkpro.com/g11.htm
Except for the tiny caliber, this would be my ideal battle rifle.


Are you kidding about that? Seriously, the caseless ammunition is impractical. It tends to cook off (the powder ignite from leftover heat from firing), and it jammed way too easily. I like the bullpup design though. It gives you the long barrel for distance in a smaller overall package. I'll also take a FAMAS, and if money is no problem, a $20,000+ HK PSG-1.


_________________
Spring is the season when the hawks all start to fly, Well maybe when I die we'll trade places, I'll grow wings and I'll fly, Hey, Blue John, hey Blue John, Heyyy Bluuuue John, Can I Play with you?


Anubis
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Sep 2006
Age: 136
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,911
Location: Mount Herculaneum/England

26 Mar 2007, 1:36 pm

TruenoBlues wrote:
T-rav20 wrote:
Anubis wrote:
Caseless bullets, which are magnetic, and have a small charge which is in the back of the round. When the pin hits it, it blows, and the bullet is propelled forward. Gas firing is replaced by spring firing, using kinetic energy to repeat the pin firing until the trigger is released.

The M16/M4 could be completely impractical for converting to caseless ammunition, besides there's already a better rifle out there...
http://www.hkpro.com/g11.htm
Except for the tiny caliber, this would be my ideal battle rifle.


Are you kidding about that? Seriously, the caseless ammunition is impractical. It tends to cook off (the powder ignite from leftover heat from firing), and it jammed way too easily. I like the bullpup design though. It gives you the long barrel for distance in a smaller overall package. I'll also take a FAMAS, and if money is no problem, a $20,000+ HK PSG-1.


Yes, it needs some good cooling. A band of liquid nitrogen around the firing piece ought to do the job.


_________________
Lalalalai.... I'll cut you up!


squatterandtheant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Mar 2007
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 531

26 Mar 2007, 1:57 pm

E7ernal wrote:
squatterandtheant wrote:
'AK47: WHEN YOU ABSOLUTELY POSITIVELY GOT TO KILL EVERY M**********R IN THE ROOM. ACCEPT NO SUBSTITUTE.'


what about grenade


I see what your saying. But nuns can be very crafty and there's alot of nukes and crannies to hide in, in a church -like under the Altar for example, where they may be shielded from a grenade blast. I prefer to run after them and extinguish them on by one with my trusty Kalashnikov. Its just my personal preference. Also I love to see their habits flap and flutter as they try to flee frantically, and hear them muttering the Rosary, in one last ditch attempt for Devine Intervention. Like thats gonna happen!

Bloody Penguins!



Alternative
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 29 Jun 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,341

26 Mar 2007, 2:59 pm

".44 Magnum, the most powerful handgun in the woorrrllldd.

Do you feel lucky? Huh, do ya punk?"

If this fact was true, I'd pick that, but as it's not hail the Uzi, the AK47, and The Bowie Knife! For The Win Mo-Fo.

When I settle down and waste all ma ammo.

I settle on a building and pick off ma targets wid a sniper rifle.



Starr
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Sep 2006
Age: 67
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,052

26 Mar 2007, 5:18 pm

Alternative wrote:
".44 Magnum, the most powerful handgun in the woorrrllldd.

Do you feel lucky? Huh, do ya punk?"



Yeah, I've always wanted to say that to someone. Preferably Andy Robinson, LOL.