PurpleReject wrote:
I have a feeling some people would say "The Bible" out of irony or personal dislike for religion, but even if you were a raging atheist you would be pretty foolish to ignore its merits as literature, as poetry and especially its immeasurable and unparalleled influence on the arts. Even Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens have praised it as great literature. Unsurprisingly, people are quick to both praise it and condemn it without actually reading it, and I take issue with both sides.
I can't honestly say every bit of the Bible is amazing - with at least 66 books by different authors (depending on which Bible) it inevitably varies; the lists of laws and genealogical records could be skipped entirely - but most of the prose and poetry are fascinating reads, no matter which angle you choose to look at them. I mean, for a book which literally shaped the entire English language, it's a decent bet there's some writing of acceptable quality. Granted, it's a difficult book to read; I read someone once compare it to reading Tolkien's 'The Silmarillion'. It's easier to digest in separate chunks rather than reading front to back.
I know this is a thread on books you hate, but as the conversation was starting to slip in that direction, I thought I'd offer that slight rebuttal. I've honestly never seen an earnest critique of the Bible which didn't end up turning into a rant about Christianity and religion in general, much less from people who've actually read the whole thing. Not that I have a problem with atheists or anti-theists, but if you're gonna bash a book - and alternately, if you're an evangelical who's going to aggressively praise and enforce the contents of the same book - you better have actually read the darn thing first.
In my post, I was referring to religious books based on the Bible, not the Bible itself. I should cite some of the funny, bizarre, and troubling things I’ve read in some of them one of these days.
My thoughts about the Bible are too complex to adequately address here.
Overall, I, personally, wish it had never been written. That’s not to say that parts of it don’t have literary merit or that it doesn’t do good things for some people, though.