The Moon Landing Never Happened, a serious discussion
Looking now at the Aldrin incident section of the Wikipedia article on Bart Sibrel. Is this the incident you are referring to?
In this incident, Sibrel was not just innocently voicing skepticism but aggressively harassing Aldrin. Punching Sibrel might not have been Aldrin's best possible response, but I wouldn't call it "absurdly defensive" either.
_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.
^ It's not the exact incident I remember actually; there was a different one I remember where some guy started talking to Buzz Lightyear at some convention and questioning him on it, and Buzz started going crazy on him like he was completely insecure about it beyond what was reasonable. I have to remember it or find it but it was completely ridiculous.
Hmmm, they wouldn't tolerate though Trump or a "MAGA" reacting like that, to being challenged, or thinking that was acceptable.
Some articles debunking moon-hoax conspiracy claims:
- Moon landing conspiracy theories, debunked - Royal Museums, Greenwich, UK
- How do we know that we went to the Moon? - Institute of Physics (UK and Ireland)
- 6 Apollo Moonlanding conspiracy theories and how to defeat them - BBC, August 30, 2023
- Moon Landing Denial Fired an Early Antiscience Conspiracy Theory Shot - Scientific American, Sep 14, 2023.
- Fox TV and the Apollo Moon Hoax - Bad Astronomy, February 13, 2001 (referenced in the above Scientific American article)
EDIT: The 4th article in the list above, the Scientific American article, does not contain much in the way of actual debunking. It is more of a general commentary about conspiracy theories. But it is where I found a link to the 5th article, which does contain substantive debunking.
_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.
Last edited by Mona Pereth on 25 Mar 2025, 4:46 pm, edited 4 times in total.
My intended point here was not that Aldrin's response to Sibrel should be considered socially "acceptable," but that it does NOT constitute evidence that Aldrin was lying.
_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.
It's been ponted out earlier in the thread that neither Russia, China or any other of the adversaries of the US have at any point made any claims that there was not a moon landing. For any reasonable person the discussion stops there.
_________________
English is not my first language.
Yeah, like I said, none of the major adversaries may have questioned the Moon Landing as they were more than happy to disengage from stupid wasteful spending on Outer Space. In any case, who's going to fly up there and prove this wrong, exactly ?
In the 4th article though, the "proof" is that no one can question the Moon Landing, because then it's related to Anti-Covid, Anti-Vax, Donald Trump, and the slippery slope of this.... Is this like the modern Catholic Church and Spanish Inquisition ? It's exactly stuff like this that makes me more think I'm on the right track, especially like with what we've seen in recent years of "don't question the science" ? And also, it wouldn't exactly make sense for MAGAs to question this if MAGAs were not approaching this with some legitimacy and integrity, as wouldn't MAGAs be questioning what's basically the achievements of straight white hetero men, back in the 60s, and completely pouring cold water on this ?
In general though, I seriously think the "proof" of the lamestream science on this is actually pretty weak, as they have some rocks that could come from anywhere, mirrors they say they installed up there, but who knows, and the whole thing is a strawman that they claim they best argument against them is "why doesn't the flag flutter in the wind"... Oh look, there's A POLE RUNNING THROUGH THE TOP.... Oooooh ! ! I don't know, I'm just not terribly impressed, all things considered.
I heard you the first time. I don't buy that argument.
_________________
English is not my first language.
Indeed, as I wrote in a subsequent edit to my earlier post just now, the 4th article does not contain much in the way of actual debunking. It is more of a general commentary about conspiracy theories. But it is where I found a link to the 5th article, which does contain substantive debunking.
The point is not that you should never question the science, but that, if you are going to question it, you should actually make an effort to learn the science, to the extent that you can. Many conspiracy claims are based on a misunderstanding of science and/or history.
Moon-hoax conspiracy claims fit in well with the general anti-intellectual attitudes that have been an aspect of the American far right for many decades.
(And not all of the relevant achievements were by straight white hetero men, but that's a matter I will wait with detailing until another time.)
Mirrors which still get used by scientists today, e.g. in order to measure the exact distance from Earth to Moon.
EDIT: More about the retro-reflectors on the Moon:
- List of retroreflectors on the Moon - Wikipedia
- Laser Beams Reflected Between Earth and Moon Boost Science, NASA, Aug 10, 2020
- National Moon Day: Mirrors on the moon and four other facts you probably didn’t know, Clemson University (South Carolina), July 17, 2023
_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.
Could be, we don't even know if the retro-reflectors are even on the Moon, or if they are there they were just left by the non-manned missions.... I think honestly the bigger question though is why someone like me who used to NEVER question something like the Moon Landing back in a year like 2004 or 2005 or so and never even thought about this, now nearly-instinctively doubts and questions everything about Western "science".... I've been at the point for awhile whenever liberal "experts" talk I literally don't care at-all what they say.
But it WASN'T "invariably fatal." Necessary safety lessons were learned, and the project proceeded in incremental steps, continuing the series of missions until NASA was finally ready to actually land a manned craft on the Moon.
_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.
kokopelli
Veteran

Joined: 27 Nov 2017
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,522
Location: amid the sunlight and the dust and the wind
If I gave it any thought, I'd be worried about whether you have lost your sanity as a result of being brainwashed.
kokopelli
Veteran

Joined: 27 Nov 2017
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,522
Location: amid the sunlight and the dust and the wind
Hmmm, they wouldn't tolerate though Trump or a "MAGA" reacting like that, to being challenged, or thinking that was acceptable.
Buzz Lightyear? What kind of nonsense is that?
At a certain point there may have been a critical juncture or lynchpin where they gave up on manned-missions, at least what was available for public consumption, and went to just filming it to say they did it..... and then after 1972 just cut bait and run and said the entire thing was prohibitively too expensive and too ambitious to explain it all away. It may have always been too Invariably-fatal at this development of human technology to journey through and beyond the Van Allen Radiation Belts, anyway, and these distances are just impossible and landing on and taking off from a foreign body also beyond the technical ability - and all subsequent manned space travel has been manageably close to earth.
kokopelli
Veteran

Joined: 27 Nov 2017
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,522
Location: amid the sunlight and the dust and the wind
It's become fantastically clear to me that the elites of the West consider the regular American public to be fantastically, fantastically stupid, and that they could pull something like this over on them for their own benefit if they thought they needed to. Interesting theory that the Moon Landing actually happened but they just gave a film to the public... Could be. I'm more of the opinion it literally didn't happen... For me I would have to see at this point some serious definite evidence that it did. I also get the flag thing as well, that there was the rod going through the top to make it look stiff so it was "waving"... Don't care about the small-scale stuff that disproves the "conspiracy".
I also saw some polls that most Russians don't think the USA ever landed on the Moon.... also, like I said, I think most of the Russian Cosmonauts eventually began to consider that going up was effectively a death sentence.... My guess is though if my opinion is right, that the distances to travel to the Moon and Mars and such are effectively and logistically impossible. With what I've seen though like with the incredible bumbling around with the Artemis Project 60 years later and they can't even seem to get this off the ground and it seems to have two rubber-bands and a plastic straw for an engine, I'm increasingly unconvinced about the veracity of these supposed feats several decades ago, like why can't they just bust the old papers out and re-create these ?
Is this babble the work of some crazy chat bot?
So, what are the main things that led you to go so deep down the general anti-science, anti-intellectual rabbit hole?
_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.
Maybe, but quite possibly not, alas. For many decades, there has been a thriving subculture of "conspiracy theorists" who believe in all sorts of wacky conspiracies. As far as I can tell, that subculture has grown steadily during the past few decades.
_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.