High Needs Autistic Advocates.
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,910
Location: Long Island, New York
This is something to do with support needs, related and relative to community and accessibility.
LFA doesn't necessarily mean high support -- HFA doesn't necessarily mean low support.
If high support means '24-hour supervision and assistance in every adaptive daily living skills' yet doesn't need to take meds, is healthy and from a stable and safe environment...
No psychiatric issues or behavioral aggressions, even if it's so developmentally delayed, all they need is a carer -- not something complex.
No different from a well cared person with intellectual disability living their lives within their existence and capacity, really.
While they need help, don't need to be advocated by a group consisting of someone else other than those who are already providing them to begin with...
Because they already have access and community.
... What about those, regardless of achievement and abilities whether as a consequence of accomodations or lack of thereof, who are in need of therapy, in need of safe space or community, requires several hospital visits, and has no safety nets that the former has?
One doesn't need to have an IQ below 70 to have serious mental illness.
One doesn't need to be LFA to be born or trapped in a system that they didn't chose to be in or are largely inaccessible for them to have accomodations.
Identity, disorder, functioning levels -- it's irrelevant.
If anything, anyone privileged enough to be able to access doesn't need help from this form of advocacy, except as a way point of access and support for others who are in need of this particular advocacy.
So most advocates are not beneficiaries themselves like how self-advocacy does.
Potentially, everyone can be an advocate for high needs autism, benefiting high needs autistics.
But I don't think the dynamic of this advocacy doesn't have to be like those advocacies of 'profound autism' towards 'profound autistics' for obvious reasons.
While low support needs autism advocacy is more to do with fighting stigmas and dehumanization yet becoming sideways into labels and terms, 'profound autism' advocacy is more about preventing and curing autism yet consequently perpetuating stigmas implying that autistics are unwanted...
I think high support needs advocacy has more choices.
They're not fighting for identities and labels, they're not here to tell the world they're unwanted either when that's the part of their own problems.
_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity
“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman
This is something to do with support needs, related and relative to community and accessibility.
LFA doesn't necessarily mean high support -- HFA doesn't necessarily mean low support.
If high support means '24-hour supervision and assistance in every adaptive daily living skills' yet doesn't need to take meds, is healthy and from a stable and safe environment...
No psychiatric issues or behavioral aggressions, even if it's so developmentally delayed, all they need is a carer -- not something complex.
No different from a well cared person with intellectual disability living their lives within their existence and capacity, really.
While they need help, don't need to be advocated by a group consisting of someone else other than those who are already providing them to begin with...
Because they already have access and community.
... What about those, regardless of achievement and abilities whether as a consequence of accomodations or lack of thereof, who are in need of therapy, in need of safe space or community, requires several hospital visits, and has no safety nets that the former has?
One doesn't need to have an IQ below 70 to have serious mental illness.
One doesn't need to be LFA to be born or trapped in a system that they didn't chose to be in or are largely inaccessible for them to have accomodations.
Identity, disorder, functioning levels -- it's irrelevant.
If anything, anyone privileged enough to be able to access doesn't need help from this form of advocacy, except as a way point of access and support for others who are in need of this particular advocacy.
So most advocates are not beneficiaries themselves like how self-advocacy does.
Potentially, everyone can be an advocate for high needs autism, benefiting high needs autistics.
But I don't think the dynamic of this advocacy doesn't have to be like those advocacies of 'profound autism' towards 'profound autistics' for obvious reasons.
While low support needs autism advocacy is more to do with fighting stigmas and dehumanization yet becoming sideways into labels and terms, 'profound autism' advocacy is more about preventing and curing autism yet consequently perpetuating stigmas implying that autistics are unwanted...
I think high support needs advocacy has more choices.
They're not fighting for identities and labels, they're not here to tell the world they're unwanted either when that's the part of their own problems.
From my own personal experiences, the 'off topic' content "hits the nail on the head!"
our reddit
our discord
This is great thing to do, and is very necessary.
In the UK, there is an emphasis in the health service on co-production and getting ideas from people with lived experience. The problem is that, when it comes to Autism, such groups are populated by higher functioning Autistics. This is because, like you said, other Autistics cannot self-advocate like this. As a result, these Autism co-productions don’t encapsulate the full range of Autistic experience.
I think it’s great, too, to raise awareness of Autism as a disability. Again, in the U.K, I have heard the health service promote Autism as just a difference. But this narrative concerns me in terms of securing funding to meet Autistic people’s needs.
our reddit
our discord
This is great thing to do, and is very necessary.
In the UK, there is an emphasis in the health service on co-production and getting ideas from people with lived experience. The problem is that, when it comes to Autism, such groups are populated by higher functioning Autistics. This is because, like you said, other Autistics cannot self-advocate like this. As a result, these Autism co-productions don’t encapsulate the full range of Autistic experience.
I think it’s great, too, to raise awareness of Autism as a disability. Again, in the U.K, I have heard the health service promote Autism as just a difference. But this narrative concerns me in terms of securing funding to meet Autistic people’s needs.
_________________
ever changing evolving and growing
I am pieplup i have level 3 autism and a number of severe mental illnesses. I am rarely active on here anymore.
I run a discord for moderate-severely autistic people if anyone would like to join. You can also contact me on discord @Pieplup or by email at [email protected]
our reddit
our discord
This is great thing to do, and is very necessary.
In the UK, there is an emphasis in the health service on co-production and getting ideas from people with lived experience. The problem is that, when it comes to Autism, such groups are populated by higher functioning Autistics. This is because, like you said, other Autistics cannot self-advocate like this. As a result, these Autism co-productions don’t encapsulate the full range of Autistic experience.
I think it’s great, too, to raise awareness of Autism as a disability. Again, in the U.K, I have heard the health service promote Autism as just a difference. But this narrative concerns me in terms of securing funding to meet Autistic people’s needs.
That's probably a better place to start anyways. If you haven't got a network of some sort, even if it's small, it's difficult to make any sort of progress.
The status quo where they temporarily balkanized the diagnosis and added a bunch of options before yanking it back was deeply problematic, but taking the conglomerate and balkanizing it again along support needs levels is also somewhat problematic.
Personally, I suspect that it would make more sense to figure out ways of uniting the extremes here as both the high support needs folks and the high masking folks got royally screwed in how the diagnosis was dealt with under the DSM 5 as neither group had a fair opportunity to shape the final criteria. Apart from a brief period, the high maskers have never received any sort of real acknowledgement or support and the types of things that we need are likely to have positive knock on effect for those with higher support needs. Especailly, if the advocates for the higher support needs folks could stop demonizing us as if we're siphoning off support or funding when really hardly any of that is being dedicated to us or our needs. I've struggled to find any sort of meaningful research being conducted for our benefit compared with the funding for higher support needs individuals.
[/quote][color=#0066bb] Right now I really need someone to help me with social medai stuff and socailizaton and people skills stuff as i can't get my message off that well. [/quote]
I don't want this to come off the wrong way but one thing you could do to better help get out your message would be to stop writing everything as a gigantic paragraph. It would also help if you wrote in complete sentences. It was hard for me to read and understand what you were saying because you had so many ideas jumbled together. Each idea should have its own paragraph. The topic sentence and each of the supporting details should also be written as complete sentences.
I say this as a retired certified teacher (32 years experience).
I have never heard of the HNAA and do not know what your position is within this organization. Is the HNAA a registered non-profit?
A casual internet search did not come up with an HNAA website. I did find a Reddit post (that has since been deleted) about HNAA's first (and possibly only) published article.
If you are passionate about self advocacy, you might consider searching for an autism advocacy group in your area and joining them instead of trying to reinvent the wheel.
_________________
Life with Autism blog and YouTube channel
https://lifewithautismorg.wordpress.com/
https://www.youtube.com/@lifewithautism5878/videos
And as I said earlier I completely agree Level 2's are an ignored group. It would not surprise me if the vast majority of level 2's are misdiagnosed as level 1's or level 3's. Being a 65-year-old autistic I know what is like to be part of an ignored group.
I was dxed with Asperger's(level 1?) in May 2019, by dint of my social interaction being assessed as being within the Asperger's range. My social communication was assessed as being at classical autism level . I'd say having both at classical autism level or both at what would've been Asperger's level, is different than a situation like mine. Would that be the somewhat ignored Level 2 you've mentioned?
How much do comorbids impact on functioning? Are they even included in such an evaluation? IMO it would be the height of ignorance and stupidity to say that a person in my situation ASD + schizophrenia/schizoaffective + very probable dyspraxia( mentioned by health professionals but never officially assessed) is on level playing ground with someone who just is an autistic person. I can not identify with autistic high fliers or with those at the other end of that spectrum. It can not be explained to anything near an acceptable degree by level of intelligence.
HashSlingingSlasher42.0
Butterfly
Joined: 9 Nov 2021
Age: 23
Gender: Female
Posts: 9
Location: Tennessee, USA
our reddit
our discord
hello hi do does yiour discord is still up i am have siscord disxcord. i would like to make to make friend snmore friends who is understand. i use r slash high support needs autistics i a lot. im am hopeing also to my mom to let me go to a day program we are to meet with our local chapteer of THE ARC next weeks hope im and can make friends irl too would be so cool. it is nice to to meet you im hope that you is see this please. Thanks
Advocating for Level 2/3 autistic people is admirable, and yes you are right, when I see level 1 people advocating for autism they are (intentionally or unintentionally) advocating for other Level 1 people. Based on WP there's a perception that Level 1 people are the only ones with autism who are seen in public and because Level 2/3 are invisible and so not of concern (at best) or a source of embarrassment to be ignored (at worst). I don't want to be judgemental but Level 1 autistic people and their community (family friends and partners) are not actually interested in issues around "severe" autism and especially when it intersects with ID (IQ < 70). My observations are that the latter subset of the autistic community are actually not that significantly different to Neurotypicals when it comes to attitudes to Level 2/3.
Something missing in your posts is the role of caregivers who are (in reality) the only advocates for Level 2/3 autistic people. Without parents there is nobody else to advocate for the child or adult. that's the real world situation.
What most level 1 autistic are engaged in is called self-advocacy.
Meaning, their individual needs and all that, whether common experience or not, would be advocated by themselves.
How relatable one's story is to none or many would be a coincidence.
Caregivers and parents are not self advocates.
So are professionals and officials involved in other types of advocacy beyond being self advocates themselves.
Whether it's realistic or out of touch, regardless whether they're involved or not, it's more to do with a common collective goal.
If a self advocate starts advocating for another case other than themselves, it's no longer self advocacy.
And those who cannot actually advocate for themselves cannot be a self-advocate.
So this thread is either calls for any high support needs autistic to be self advocates, or call more advocates for high support needs autistics which can be anyone who can perform advocacy.
_________________
Gained Number Post Count (1).
Lose Time (n).
Lose more time here - Updates at least once a week.
Last edited by Edna3362 on 03 Jul 2024, 5:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
And those who cannot actually advocate for themselves cannot be a self-advocate.
Fair point re: Level 1 folk, my issue is Level 2/3 folk can't self-advocate.
Of course people don't typically advocate at populations that either don't appeal them potential, humanity or hype unless they're affected or directly involved at such people in proximity. Which is typical of humans, really.
The problem of those who can't self-advocate is the odds of having an advocate (whoever it might be) who are supposed to advocate for them yet are advocating about themselves and/or their struggles of handling level 2/3 (if they're caretakers), and not about the autistic level 2/3 themselves.
The incidence of sympathy and support goes to the caretakers and parents and the not-self-advocates, instead of about the autistic themselves regardless of level and how to support them, if autistics are included at all as an individual with it's own agency instead of being a prop or a center of conflict of an narrative.
I pray that such dynamics and ways of advocating higher level support needs autistics will be over soon.
It's just that level 1 autistics happened to be able to fight for it by being self-advocates themselves.
The main divide was the argument of which autistics are the ones who can vs who cannot be able to advocate for themselves.
So far that's the only way to 'get out' of that excluding dynamic; do it by themselves.
It's one thing to advocate and it's about the autistic individual, how far they've come, how they're having a hard time, etc.
It's another to advocate and the narratives are about how difficult they're handled and how costly it is.
Technically, it's a different form of self-advocacy; that is, specifically, parents of whichever case, in which in need of an entirely different support, different accomodations, different priorities.
There's to advocate and it's about their family and how that changes them because of the difference in one family member; good or bad as a collective and not simply singling out the different one out...
And then there's to advocate that autistics aren't worth fighting and they should be eliminated because they desired a 'normal child and normal family'.
You know the history of these things, yes?
_________________
Gained Number Post Count (1).
Lose Time (n).
Lose more time here - Updates at least once a week.
And then there's to advocate that autistics aren't worth fighting and they should be eliminated because they desired a 'normal child and normal family'.
You know the history of these things, yes?
Yes I know the history, and I also know that when (in future) it becomes possible to do prenatal testing or gene selection then autism will cease to exist as people will opt to terminate an embryo carrying "faulty" genes.
And then there's to advocate that autistics aren't worth fighting and they should be eliminated because they desired a 'normal child and normal family'.
You know the history of these things, yes?
Yes I know the history, and I also know that when (in future) it becomes possible to do prenatal testing or gene selection then autism will cease to exist as people will opt to terminate an embryo carrying "faulty" genes.
Not sure the relevance of abortion or future prenatal testing in advocating for those already here. Unless its in the context of anti abortion which is a wider separate subject.
_________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends upon the unreasonable man."
- George Bernie Shaw
And those who cannot actually advocate for themselves cannot be a self-advocate.
Fair point re: Level 1 folk, my issue is Level 2/3 folk can't self-advocate.
Level 1 folks often times can't because those cases go undiagnosed. It's why they were able to rewrite the diagnostic criteria to exclude higher IQ autistic folks. Whereas level 2/3 may or may not be able to depending upon what precise set of traits landed them at that level of support needs. In some cases a level 3 support needs person may actually be more able to advocate for themselves than a level 1 support needs.
That being said, obviously, if you restrict it to people that know, that's going to largely reverse.
And then there's to advocate that autistics aren't worth fighting and they should be eliminated because they desired a 'normal child and normal family'.
You know the history of these things, yes?
Yes I know the history, and I also know that when (in future) it becomes possible to do prenatal testing or gene selection then autism will cease to exist as people will opt to terminate an embryo carrying "faulty" genes.
Not sure the relevance of abortion or future prenatal testing in advocating for those already here. Unless its in the context of anti abortion which is a wider separate subject.
Which is why I added "also" in my post.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Anything Else I Should Consider With High Scores? |
18 Sep 2024, 10:05 pm |
Can I finish high school online? |
08 Sep 2024, 3:43 pm |
Anyone working as High School teacher? |
16 Nov 2024, 8:34 pm |
Georgia High School Mass shooting |
24 Sep 2024, 8:57 am |