After Trump’s win, some women are considering the 4B movemen

Page 3 of 3 [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

Honey69
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Jan 2023
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,611
Location: Llareggub

Today, 9:32 am

TwilightPrincess wrote:
More women voted for Harris than Trump overall, and more women voted for Harris than men did in each demographic if you break it down by race and age:


The majority of women in the USA are White, and most White women voted for the criminal. Which I find astounding.

TwilightPrincess wrote:
It doesn’t seem necessary to come up with theories suggesting that women didn’t vote for Harris because of supposed competition or whatever else.


We are humans, and humans ponder. Pondering distinguishes humans from other animal species.

Intrasexual competition between women evolved early among our pre-human ancestors, as did other aspects of human behavior that may not be particularly functional in modern societies. For example, the "fight-or-flight" instinct was useful to our ancestors when threatened by a predator, but is less helpful to modern humans when we're annoyed by an office-mate.

If we can posit, at least somewhat convincingly, that, for example, Nicole Russell's derogatory comments about Kamala Harris, and other women's desires not to see a highly-qualified woman succeed, stemmed from an inherited trait that had its root in pre-human sex, then, perhaps, more female voters will be shamed into voting based on a candidate's actual qualifications. Or, we could just throw our hands in the air, and try to field George Clooney or Brad Pitt as presidential candidates.

“Occam’s razor, or the principle of parsimony, tells us that the simplest, most elegant explanation is usually the one closest to the truth.”

An interesting story about a hypothesis that was disproven: https://scienceandsociety.duke.edu/occa ... .%E2%80%9D

TwilightPrincess wrote:
As with men, women have political opinions and complex reasons for them.


I don't know that men are really that complicated.

Jill Filipovic wrote:

https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opi ... rcna179412

But if you’re the kind of person who likes breaking things — or to return to the Girdusky metaphor, who likes to watch things burn — then the suffering of those you deem unworthy is more appealing than appalling; maybe it’s even exciting. Indeed, Trump's final campaign events seemed increasingly mean-spirited. While Harris surrounded herself with surrogates like Beyoncé and Taylor Swift and struck a tone of optimism, Trump relied on male celebrities and subcultures that emphasize a specific kind of macho masculinity: Hulk Hogan, Dana White, Joe Rogan and Elon Musk.



TwilightPrincess wrote:
There are a lot of religious, conservative women in this country who consider it their religious duty to vote Republican.


Religion evolved early among humans, to keep us in line. Intrasexual competition came to our species earlier, as intrasexual competition occurs among other social animals that have no religion.

TwilightPrincess wrote:
Also, 91% of Black female voters voted for Harris.


Black female voters were also credited with defeating a pedophile Senate candidate in Alabama in 2017.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-co ... men-voters

TwilightPrincess wrote:
I think the divide is about political ideology, not competition, although, undoubtedly, sexism and racism played some role.


I think that political ideology had very little to do with it. More voters are going to be harmed than helped by Trump's plans for the future. A lot of voters just thought that Trump was cute.


_________________
May you be blessed by YHWH and his Asherah


TwilightPrincess
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Sep 2016
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,573
Location: Hell

Today, 9:48 am

Honey69 wrote:
TwilightPrincess wrote:
More women voted for Harris than Trump overall, and more women voted for Harris than men did in each demographic if you break it down by race and age:


The majority of women in the USA are White, and most White women voted for the criminal. Which I find astounding.

Still, a smaller percentage of White female voters voted for Trump than White men, so the competition theory doesn’t really hold up. I don’t think we need to speculate with sexist theories as to why women voted for Trump when more reasonable and likely explanations are readily available. We also don’t need to call out female voters, specifically, when they aren’t the only group who voted for Trump. As has already been stated, a higher percentage of men voted for him in each age bracket or racial category.

Honey69 wrote:
TwilightPrincess wrote:
As with men, women have political opinions and complex reasons for them.


I don't know that men are really that complicated.

The political and religious landscape in America IS complex. That’s true no matter a person’s gender.

Honey69 wrote:
I think that political ideology had very little to do with it. More voters are going to be harmed than helped by Trump's plans for the future. A lot of voters just thought that Trump was cute.

I’ve never encountered a person who thought Trump was cute, and most people I know who vote voted for him. It mostly came down to their allegiance to the Republican Party due to its stance on issues related to religion, abortion, and economics - that’s true regardless of gender. People who are not strongly aligned to the Republican Party but voted for him anyway largely seemed to think he’d be good for the economy.

I think that it would’ve been beneficial if the switch from Biden to Harris would’ve happened sooner because some folks’ minds were already made up by that point. Many people were very unhappy with Biden’s presidency. Of course, when people are unhappy with a Democrat, they are ready for a Republican and vice versa. That doesn’t change the fact that sexism and racism was involved in Trump’s campaign and among voters. Sexism (and often racism on some level) is built into the Republican Party although it’s not always recognized as such.



Honey69
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Jan 2023
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,611
Location: Llareggub

Today, 11:04 am

TwilightPrincess wrote:
Still, a smaller percentage of White female voters voted for Trump than White men, so the competition theory doesn’t really hold up.


The competition theory would only apply to female Trump voters. Other theories would apply to male Trump voters. I don't have any grand theory worked out, but there is this:

https://www.glamour.com/story/why-did-y ... nald-trump

Rachel Janfaza wrote:
...So why did so many men swing right during the 2024 election? Much has been said about Trump’s embrace of masculinity throughout his campaign—traversing the podcast sphere with often provocative, highly popular personalities like Adin Ross, influencer and wrestler Logan Paul, Flagrant’s Andrew Schulz, and of course, Joe Rogan. And then there’s the enduring image of 71-year-old former WWE wrestler Hulk Hogan ripping his shirt off at the Republican National Convention....

... Many young men say they voted for the former president not because they are anti-choice or against human rights or are even that pro-masculinity, but because they’re tired of feeling bad for being a man.

I’ve interviewed young men who echo Sumners’s concerns with what he sees as an overfixation on gender from the left. While it’s difficult, they say, to point to policies that are explicitly anti-man, they argue they’ve been made to feel uncomfortable for being who they are. “​​I feel like there’s this cultural frustration that young men have that they’re not allowed to be young men,” says 26-year-old Benji Backer from Arizona. “That probably went too far. No one’s telling women they can’t be women.”...


I don't think that the Harris campaign was explicitly anti-man. Many Trump supporters might have accused the Harris campaign of being explicitly anti-man, but I think that was projection more than anything.

TwilightPrincess wrote:
I don’t think we need to speculate with sexist theories as to why women voted for Trump when more reasonable and likely explanations are readily available.


We don't need to do anything, but we can speculate all we wish. Women and men do behave differently, and may have different core reasons for voting as they do. So far, I've cited two female authors who felt that men were motivated to vote for Trump because the Harris campaign was anti-male. I don't think that the Harris campaign was "anti-male"--maybe just not masculinist enough for some tastes.

TwilightPrincess wrote:

I think if you aren’t American it might be challenging to comprehend the political and religious landscape here. It IS complex. That’s true no matter a person’s gender.


I'm American, and I favor the principle of parsimony.

TwilightPrincess wrote:
I’ve never encountered a person who thought Trump was cute, and most people I know who vote voted for him.


I don't think that you will encounter anyone who is going to SAY that Trump is cute. But,

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog ... trump-cute

Glenn C. Altschuler wrote:
Is Donald Trump Cute?
If you use a post-modern definition, Donald Trump has a "touch of cute."

...Most of us will agree, he suggests, about which personalities are cute and which aren’t. Cute leaders will not necessarily be innately harmless, innocent, submissive, or moral. They may well be, at once, strong and vulnerable; self-conscious and naïve; menacing and gentle; beautiful and gruesome. For May, Lady Gaga is not cute, but Shirley Temple was; Winston Churchill was cute, while Theresa May is not; Hillary Clinton is not cute, but Donald Trump has “a touch” of it.

Americans under Trump’s spell, May writes, neither seek nor need to know whether he believes his truths or his lies. A consummate performance artist, with a distinguished lineage that includes Phineas T. Barnum, Trump embodies an alienated world threatened by meaninglessness and promises relief from it. He “evokes the sinister and the consoling, the malevolent and the benevolent, the destructive and the creative … the promise of chaos and the promise of order; and these ‘inconsistencies’ draw power precisely from not being resolved.” Trump won—and he wins—“by stepping outside the realm of sincerity,” something none of his rivals “could or dared” to do.

Many Trump supporters, of course, believe in absolute truths: Abortion is murder, Islam is evil, and immigrants streaming across our southern border constitute an existential threat to the United States. That said, it seems to me that Simon May has pinpointed key elements of Trump’s formula: Evoke the fragmentation of the modern world, allow alienated American voters to experience chaos and the threat it poses from a distance, while promising a new—and old—order that will “make America great again.”



TwilightPrincess wrote:
It mostly came down to their allegiance to the Republican Party due to its stance on things like religion, abortion, and economics - that’s true regardless of gender. People who are not strongly aligned to the Republican Party largely seemed to think he’d be good for the economy.


So, actually it ISN'T complex? If it came down to the Republican Party's stance on things like religion, abortion, etc., then Mike Pence would have won the nomination. Not Donald Trump.

TwilightPrincess wrote:
Many people were very unhappy with Biden’s presidency.


Only because of what the Fox Noise Machine told them.

TwilightPrincess wrote:
That doesn’t change the fact that sexism and racism was involved in Trump’s campaign and among voters. Sexism is built into the Republican Party although it’s not always recognized as such.


I think that everyone recognizes the sexism. People disagree on whether the sexism is good or bad.


_________________
May you be blessed by YHWH and his Asherah


TwilightPrincess
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Sep 2016
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,573
Location: Hell

Today, 11:13 am

Men and women aren’t as different with their political outlooks as you appear to be claiming although it is true that female voters were more likely to vote for Harris and are more liberal overall. Based on people’s own stated, political opinions, it seems like men and women, in general, voted for Trump for similar reasons, though. Many of your arguments in this thread have a distinctly sexist flavor to them - George Clooney/Brad Pitt, high-heeled shoes, Trump being cute (ew.), women competing against each other, shaming female voters who voted for Trump, etc. - all in a thread allegedly about a feminist movement centered on pushing back against sexism. At any rate, it’s almost like you’re suggesting that women don’t have strong political or religious ideological views. Obviously, I strongly disagree with those who voted for Trump on many levels, but I don’t think it’s fair or correct to suggest that people who voted for him, in this case women, did so for the reasons you’re suggesting.

Quote:
So, actually it ISN'T complex? If it came down to the Republican Party's stance on things like religion, abortion, etc., then Mike Pence would have won the nomination. Not Donald Trump.

It’s too complex and multifaceted to sufficiently address in one post or thread. I will say that Pence doesn’t have a cult following - a cult made up of both men and women.