Was Jesus really God?
Some Lutheran Synods largely leave matters between the believer and God without a lot of Church in the middle. I know the ELCA does, I'm not sure about others. (Just definitely not Missouri or Wisconsin Synod, those are pretty hardcore)
The most hands-off are the Unitarians who encourage you to form your own theology.
By the by, Yahweh wasn't the only god to have sired both divine and mortal offspring. Zeus was quite active in that regard.
https://www.theoi.com/Olympios/ZeusFamily.html
_________________
Semen retentum venenum est
Some Lutheran Synods largely leave matters between the believer and God without a lot of Church in the middle. I know the ELCA does, I'm not sure about others. (Just definitely not Missouri or Wisconsin Synod, those are pretty hardcore)
The most hands-off are the Unitarians who encourage you to form your own theology.
Or hopefully, in my case, my own atheology. Or is it a nontheology? One thing for sure, it's a lot simpler than having to fathom this god-is-3-persons-but-only-one-person nonsense.
You're not supposed to think about it--only accept and believe it.
_________________
Semen retentum venenum est
^
Ah, that's why I don't make an ideal flock member - I think about things and make rational decisions. I have some liking for emotional, instinctive decision-making too, but only when I can make my own decisions. So this submission lark, which seems central to most organised religion, has no purchase with me. I'm quite capable of obedience, but only when I myself judge or feel it to be appropriate as a necessary evil.
Some Lutheran Synods largely leave matters between the believer and God without a lot of Church in the middle. I know the ELCA does, I'm not sure about others. (Just definitely not Missouri or Wisconsin Synod, those are pretty hardcore)
The most hands-off are the Unitarians who encourage you to form your own theology.
Definitely, that's probably part of why my best friend went there for services. His mother is Jewish and his father is some sort of Baptist. Unitarianism isn't a bad place to go if you've got parents that come from different traditions.
You're not supposed to think about it--only accept and believe it.
Yep, if you want to actually think about it, there are definitely options out of Asia that are more appropriate.
If Jesus is God...
... So is everyone.
This is a metaphor of sorts, seeing past through the religious terms, vocabulary and concepts -- past through the characters and associations of names and story telling, and somehow the academics of it...
Well, I usually just go screw the academics and semantics... And go straight to interpretation, no matter how nuisance or not I ended up with.
But not everyone can grasp the concept, even with those who knew the bible by the heart.
And even if they do 'know'; they don't believe so.
Yet, if they do 'believe', they don't truly know what it meant either and likely do not act let alone live in it.
At worst, it further divides people...
But there are those who don't know nor believe; but truly understands the concept.
Just not with Christian terms and lexicon or by reading the bible.
I don't know.
Being "half blind" (this is not literal) is confusing.
As confusing as trying to translate a paragraph, and translate it through several different languages multiple times with google translate -- except it's way less hilarious.
I do wonder if there is an actual term for what I'm experiencing...
_________________
Gained Number Post Count (1).
Lose Time (n).
Lose more time here - Updates at least once a week.
For those who don't want to watch the video, Ehrman touches on the Trinity in his blog:
There are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Spirit, and these three are one.
Right! There it is. That’s just about as explicit as can be. There are three. They are in heaven (meaning they are divine beings). They are God the Father, and the “Word” of God (i.e., Christ), and the Spirit. And those three are one. So the Trinity is indeed taught in the Bible, right?
It will take me two posts, but I’m going to explain why this verse was not originally in the New Testament. It was added by a later scribe. This is not a disputed point among biblical scholars – except for some rather hard-core fundamentalists. The evidence is so overwhelming that I agreed the verse wasn’t original back when I myself was a rather hard-core fundamentalist.
https://ehrmanblog.org/is-the-trinity-in-the-bible/
The muddle of the Trinity (the Father, Wholly Spirit and Son) should be the God the Wholly Spirit as absolute ‘essential’ being in spatial terms known through unconditional Love, his Goddess the Wholly Ghost as being infinite ‘substantial’ becoming in dimensional terms known through endless Wisdom, and the Son as being ‘a’ child of God (in the singular sense) amongst the children of God and the Goddess as being all created ‘formational’ things in the finite sense from the scale of galaxies down to subatomic particles (at least) known through the evolutional / ascensional Experience of God and Goddess involving rebirth, hence the life everlasting thing, and Jesus’s and other prophets teachings on how not to get stuck here in this particular scheme of things, involving Dharma (teachings) and Karma (repercussions).
Hence we are made in the image of the in-visible God (EL) made visibly manifest through his Goddess (Asherah ~ the Goddess of Poles and hence the home maker when tents and tribal nomadism was the thing) as divine consort involving the Elohim as together being the council of God, representing and consisting of all, as being a shared ‘horizontal’ and ‘diagonal’ hierarchy of equality involving collaboration rather than than an enforced ‘vertical’ hierarchy of dictatorship involving adversarialism.
Hence the Psalm of Asaph as being Psalm 82:
1.) God presides in the great assembly; he renders judgment among the “gods”:
2.) “How long will you defend the unjust and show partiality to the wicked?
3.) Defend the weak and the fatherless; uphold the cause of the poor and the oppressed.
4.) Rescue the weak and the needy; deliver them from the hand of the wicked.
5.) “The ‘gods’ know nothing, they understand nothing. They walk about in darkness; all
the foundations of the earth are shaken.
6.) “I said, ‘You are “gods”; you are all sons of the Most High.’
7.) But you will die like mere mortals; you will fall like every other ruler.”
8.) Rise up, O God, judge the earth, for all the nations are your inheritance.
Which Jesus in part quote when asked if he was ‘the’ son of God (when under threat of being stoned) when he only ever stated he was a child of God through his Goddess as a spirit rather than a child of men through women as a human, hence infinite life rather than a finite one.
_________________
I reserve the right or is it left to at very least be wrong
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 29,856
Location: Right over your left shoulder
Trinities were common in Indo-European folklore, so that's likely where the meme originated.
_________________
Scratch a Liberal and a Fascist bleeds
"Many of us like to ask ourselves, What would I do if I was alive during slavery? Or the Jim Crow South? Or apartheid? What would I do if my country was committing genocide?' The answer is, you're doing it. Right now." —Former U.S. Airman (Air Force) Aaron Bushnell
Trinities were common in Indo-European folklore, so that's likely where the meme originated.
OK, that gives a possible source of the concept, but what I mean is, why did they bolt it onto Christianity? My best guess so far is that they needed to explain away the apparent contradiction of a monotheistic religion having 3 gods, but that is only a guess.
funeralxempire
Veteran
Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 29,856
Location: Right over your left shoulder
Trinities were common in Indo-European folklore, so that's likely where the meme originated.
OK, that gives a possible source of the concept, but what I mean is, why did they bolt it onto Christianity? My best guess so far is that they needed to explain away the apparent contradiction of a monotheistic religion having 3 gods, but that is only a guess.
I don't believe there were three distinct gods prior to that concept being grafted on, instead the trinity was a way to reconcile the view of Jesus as God, with YHWH and with the Holy Spirit as a distinct entity.
My understanding is that within Judaism the Holy Spirit is not viewed as distinct from YHWH.
My understanding is that within early Christianity, Jesus was generally not viewed as God.
The (already common) trope of a threefold god provided a template to reinterpret Jesus, YHWH and the Holy Spirit as all one entity, but with three distinct versions. All that had to be done was ignore what other Christians said about Jesus and what Jews say about God and the Holy Spirit and paganize those concepts to make them more palatable for Gentiles.
That's not the only example of early Christianity moving away from Jewish concepts and taboos either.
_________________
Scratch a Liberal and a Fascist bleeds
"Many of us like to ask ourselves, What would I do if I was alive during slavery? Or the Jim Crow South? Or apartheid? What would I do if my country was committing genocide?' The answer is, you're doing it. Right now." —Former U.S. Airman (Air Force) Aaron Bushnell