Bonny wrote:
"Social skills" ???????
we all have some, but NOT having the ones a boss might want aimed at protecting their job; company or assett - this i think is not a 'social skill ' but a bloodhound role protecting whatever at work and has rarely got anything to do with the skills needed for the job..
My point being that in the past with different field posts of what's important for the boss, many of us were agreeable and therefore useful.
"social skill/performance criteria" are hooks to discharge and discard employee numbers.
My Grandad was right to warn me off crude profiteering and the politics of work.
Forgive my rant here, but it does annoy me so, the neanderthal approach to workers...cause i like working, and i don't like someone chopping my choices out.
Spot on! Unless you work in a box there's going to be some level of social skills required in your work. I just have to wonder why nearly all administrative jobs have customer service elements (reception, telephone, sales, etc) that need social skills.
I remember reading Clive James' excellent autobiographies. In it he talks about the jobs he had to do until he could start studying at Cambridge. One was working at Penguin books' photo archive, receiving requests for photos and sending them up to the printing shop, the rest of the time he was alone and read books. That sounded like my dream job!
Fiz wrote:
he's a lazy sod at the best of times
Since I moved out here to California, I miss the British slang so much! The only sod out here is on your lawn!