Probably closer to Republican(if we are talking in terms of some ideal essence or some such), although I don't consider myself such. I mean, I disagree with their views significantly, I disagree with their foreign policy significantly, I disagree with their social policies significantly, and to some extent I think that their economic views are stupid. But generally I have a more conservative and market-oriented mindset than I have a more progressive mindset.
To use some terminology by economics professor Arnold Kling, I am a very strongly an L, and somewhat sympathetic to C (so long as it can express it's views in the terms that Kling uses or similar ones and in a relatively open manner) but not much of a P, due to a distrust of the institutional framework of government, along with a perceived greater fallibility of government and expert leadership.
http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/200 ... ian_1.html"1. Point L, where you believe that markets are effective at processing information and solving problems. This position is to take a radically pro-market view, and to let markets fix their own failures.
2. Point C, where you believe that tradition incorporates the evolved use of information to solve problems. This position is to be very cautious about overthrowing existing institutional arrangements.
3. Point P, where you believe that expert technocrats should be in charge. You are comfortable with throwing out tradition and markets in order to cede power to experts."
Of course it's all much clearer if you read it in the original Klingon