makuranososhi wrote:
To revive an occasional, specific and relevant thread? I don't see that as an issue. When a user chooses to revive multiple old topics without contribution, or for the purpose of controversy, then it is problematic. It also becomes an issue in that members may no longer be active here which can lead to frustration when questions go unanswered, or there is implied urgency for something months or years in the past.
M.
You mean all 32,151 members are not active just how many are and can there be a listing of that number to get real perspective on how may people are really here
_________________
"Strange is your language and I have no decoder Why don't make your intentions clear..." Peter Gabriel