Page 1 of 1 [ 14 posts ] 

swansong
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 18 Feb 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 107

21 Feb 2010, 9:00 pm

Don't a lot of people blame vaccines for autism?
How legitimate are those claims?



Master_Pedant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,903

21 Feb 2010, 9:54 pm

Not at all legitimate.

The anti-vaccination movement (AVM) is at least two-pronged: one prong denies a causal connection between vaccines and the eradication or significant reduction of diseases like smallpox, polio, measles, and rubella; the other prong perceives vaccines as causing diseases, e.g., it claims that the MMR (mumps-measles-rubella) vaccine causes autism. Either way, the AVM proponents oppose vaccination against disease.

....

There have been many well-designed studies that have examined claims that vaccines cause chronic diseases such as asthma, multiple sclerosis, chronic arthritis, sudden infant death syndrome, and diabetes. The studies have not found compelling evidence for any such links.* That has not stopped some anti-vaccinationists from speculating that some children are "especially sensitive" to vaccines and that scientific control studies can't be refined enough to validate this claim.


A prominent British medical journal on Tuesday retracted a 1998 research paper that set off a sharp decline in vaccinations in Britain after the paper’s lead author suggested that vaccines could cause autism.


During a question and answer session after a talk I recently gave, I was asked for my opinion about the vaccine/autism controversy. That was easy: my opinion is that there is no controversy. The evidence is in. The scientific community has reached a clear consensus that vaccines don’t cause autism. There is no controversy.



Brosch91
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 28
Location: Benzie County, MI/United States

21 Feb 2010, 10:04 pm

I never heard this claim before, but it doesn't seem to be legitimate by any means.


_________________
The theory that the internet phrase lol,meaning "laugh out loud", can be placed at any part in any sentence and make a sentence lose all credibility and seriousness.


Moony
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 16 Dec 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 287

21 Feb 2010, 10:18 pm

Brosch91 wrote:
I never heard this claim before, but it doesn't seem to be legitimate by any means.

I'm surprised.

There's a very long story behind it. Long story shory, a doctor faked a whole bunch of results in a study to the effect that the MMR vaccine causes autism. He was being payed off by people in a lawsuite against the people who make the MMR vaccine. He single handedly caused the return of the measles to Britan. The study was retracted, but sadly, many people still believe that vaccines cause autism, and put their children at terrible risk by foregoing it.


_________________
I prefer to believe that the universe is fundamentally absurd, and if I ignore it, it might go away.
Never assume everyone's better off than you, that's unfounded optimism.
15 and diagnosed with Asperger's Syndrome


barbedlotus
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jul 2009
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 185

22 Feb 2010, 12:48 am

The first time I actually ran into this claim was a pediatrician that wasn't my own railing at me for not having my sons vaccinations up to date. The funny thing is I'd been calling that peditrician to try and get an appointment to catch him up and we were only behind because I didn't have the money and there had been a gap in our health insurance for three months. They worked out of the same office so I think the moment he saw in my son's file that he has aspergers he jumped to the conclusion that I'd stopped the vaccinations after the diagnoses especially since I'd turned down a flu shot a month before (because he already had gotten one for free at my job >_<). I don't know what parent made him so jumpy about it, but man they must have been parnoid.



Meow101
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Age: 62
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,699
Location: USA

22 Feb 2010, 9:49 am

swansong wrote:
Don't a lot of people blame vaccines for autism?
How legitimate are those claims?
\

Not. They were debunked.
~Kate



Illite
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 19 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 38

22 Feb 2010, 12:46 pm

Well, Im not inclined to believe it has been truely debunked, nor will I fully accept that it might be true. One thing for damn sure I will say is that I think the idea of pumping thiomersal into us sure in the hell can't help matters much.



SDFarsight
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 241

22 Feb 2010, 12:53 pm

Illite wrote:
Well, Im not inclined to believe it has been truely debunked, nor will I fully accept that it might be true. One thing for damn sure I will say is that I think the idea of pumping thiomersal into us sure in the hell can't help matters much.


It was debunked, and one of the scientists in the UK who promoted the theory has been taken to court for Serious Professional Misconduct.



pat2rome
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Jun 2009
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,819
Location: Georgia

22 Feb 2010, 3:30 pm

Those claims are just as legitimate as the claims that creationism should be taught as science (which is to say, not legitimate whatsoever).


_________________
I'm never gonna dance again, Aspie feet have got no rhythm.


matrixluver
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 19 Oct 2008
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 163

22 Feb 2010, 7:27 pm

Illite wrote:
Well, Im not inclined to believe it has been truely debunked, nor will I fully accept that it might be true. One thing for damn sure I will say is that I think the idea of pumping thiomersal into us sure in the hell can't help matters much.


Thermisol is NO LONGER IN ANY SHOTS except flu shots. So if that was the cause of Autism why are the rates going UP not DOWN?



Fo-Rum
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 435

23 Feb 2010, 1:49 pm

Personally, I believe what "single-handedly" brought measles back to Britain was a -dependence- on vaccines. The measles death rate dropped by 97% before the vaccine for it ever existed. If people had a healthier diet (as opposed to food filled with garbage such as processes goods), and proper exposure to things like vitamin D3 (our body doesn't always get enough), combined with normal levels of sleep and exercise, then I bet it would be a lot better than vaccines. Relying on your body to build immunity is a natural and more reliable method than vaccines, which doesn't properly trigger the immune system anyway.

matrixluver wrote:
Illite wrote:
Well, Im not inclined to believe it has been truely debunked, nor will I fully accept that it might be true. One thing for damn sure I will say is that I think the idea of pumping thiomersal into us sure in the hell can't help matters much.


Thermisol is NO LONGER IN ANY SHOTS except flu shots. So if that was the cause of Autism why are the rates going UP not DOWN?


Thimerosal was only accused of the cause due to mercury. This is a reasonable claim, especially since the levels they put in the shots exceeded safety amounts. Whether or not it caused it is irrelevant to me though.

I have however read an article talking about how the flu introduced to a developing child in the womb (tested on rats though) could produce autistic like offspring. That means that perhaps it was not the mercury but instead it was a bacterial introduction at ages of a developing brain and immune system that could trigger autism. Who knows?

Either way, I'm not too concerned of the results, but am interested in which is actually true. It is unfortunate though that so many companies play games for profit. In this case it would help to make vaccines look safer so they can get more sales. The swine flu didn't go as expected for vaccination rates so it would only make sense to push vaccine safety more.


_________________
Permanently inane.


Laar
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 68

24 Feb 2010, 6:27 am

It is as debunked as it can be. Though statistics can never , I repeat never, prove something.



tweety_fan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Oct 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,555

Brennan
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2010
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 309
Location: Sydney

04 Mar 2010, 10:08 pm

Fo-Rum wrote:
Personally, I believe what "single-handedly" brought measles back to Britain was a -dependence- on vaccines. The measles death rate dropped by 97% before the vaccine for it ever existed. If people had a healthier diet (as opposed to food filled with garbage such as processes goods), and proper exposure to things like vitamin D3 (our body doesn't always get enough), combined with normal levels of sleep and exercise, then I bet it would be a lot better than vaccines. Relying on your body to build immunity is a natural and more reliable method than vaccines, which doesn't properly trigger the immune system anyway.


Can you please provide proof of this claim that the measles death rate dropped by 97% before the vaccine existed as this goes against everything I have read on infectious disease including textbooks assigned during my pathological basis of infectious disease course at university.


Fo-Rum wrote:
Thimerosal was only accused of the cause due to mercury. This is a reasonable claim, especially since the levels they put in the shots exceeded safety amounts. Whether or not it caused it is irrelevant to me though.


Thimerosal contains a relatively inactive and harmless compound of mercury which doesn't build up in the body and is excreted out of the body within about 18 days. The level of it in vaccines did not exceed safety amounts or else the vaccines would have never been introduced. Thimerosal was removed from vaccines not because it was dangerous but because a more effective adjunct was discovered.

Fo-Rum wrote:
I have however read an article talking about how the flu introduced to a developing child in the womb (tested on rats though) could produce autistic like offspring. That means that perhaps it was not the mercury but instead it was a bacterial introduction at ages of a developing brain and immune system that could trigger autism. Who knows?

Either way, I'm not too concerned of the results, but am interested in which is actually true. It is unfortunate though that so many companies play games for profit. In this case it would help to make vaccines look safer so they can get more sales. The swine flu didn't go as expected for vaccination rates so it would only make sense to push vaccine safety more.


Can you provide a link to this article that shows how introducing the flu virus to a developing fetus causes autistic like traits as I would be interested to read about this study?
If introducing viruses to humans caused autism every single person on this planet would be autistic, not just those that have had vaccines (if you want to believe that nonsense). Think about how many viruses you are exposed to every single day. This viral load far exceeds any vaccine dose you would ever receive.