Duckfetishgirl wrote:
I would want one, yea. But not super fast. Guys just want things to happen too quickly.
First post ever... howdy all!
Just as a preface, it's perfectly okay to want sex to come later. One just has to set those boundaries and be willing to squawk when lines are crossed. It might also be helpful to study how people indicate various types and levels of interest, not only to interpret the current intentions of the person in front of you, but to fine-tune your own signals. It's not particularly helpful for me to mention now, but long long ago I found some lost-and-forgotten remnants of pages on a web site that discussed basic body language. Sadly, it wasn't even close to complete.
What jeffhermy said: put thought into what sort of relationship you're looking for, and let the labels serve you rather than vice versa. Labels are often attached to a lot of baggage and unexamined expectations which you might not care for very much. In your work to define what relationship means to you, feel free to detach those components and attach others that you feel you need, either for now or for the foreseeable future, but be prepared to define your ideas explicitly and eventually sit down with a potential other at the appropriate time (something I sometimes jump the gun on, whoops) to discuss this stuff specifically. Hopefully by the time they've gotten to that stage, they have some sort of understanding of how you think and process, and can summon patience to accommodate the differences.
What is a relationship? There are a lot of assumptions buried in the word. Here are some questions that address some of them, along with other important attributes and limits, whose answers you should ponder and note and eventually be ready to discuss. Where do you want the relationship to go? How far would it have to go before you'd consider an end a success? (I offer that any experience gained in the realm of relationships is a success, even if it ends in tears. Congratulations; you just learned something you don't want.) Sex? (At what level of trust? What kind? What risks are acceptable? Is kink a plus or minus?) Emotional intimacy? Exclusivity in sex and/or emotions? (If not absolutely yes or absolutely no, then how much, and is that reasonable for the person?) How much time is ideally spent together? Intention to cohabitate? How often (minimum/maximum) would you communicate and by what media? How often (minimum/maximum) might you see each other and under what circumstances? Are you willing to build a relationship whose longevity or other factors are limited by external and possibly unpredictable circumstances (jobs/school/family)?
Yes, that's quite a bit to think about. No, you don't have to know all the answers if you don't have relationship experience. Yes, it's okay for real individuals to not match 100% to your requirements, and differ in where the differences are. Yes, it's probably a bad idea to whip out a checklist and turn the first date into a job interview
And no, don't trust anything fictional on relationships when checking for reasonableness! I've seen too many bad relationships directly modeled on bad fiction -- monkey see, monkey do.
Practically speaking, consider online dating if chatting people up cold at a social function isn't particularly comfortable for you. It's where I met my wonderful, understanding NT girlfriend of 2.75 years.
Hope this helps!