leschevalsroses wrote:
I've read a lot that many children with autism do not pretend play and do make believe with dolls and toys, but when I was little I was really into that sort of thing and did it non-stop with my dolls and Barbies.
I would make up and act out these really long and drawn-out stories with them that usually revolved around the Beauty and the Beast storyline
Er, well actually you did not make up the Beauty and the Beast storyline. When I read this information I made an immediate prediction, confirmed by your following comments.
Quote:
(I was obsessed with Beauty and the Beast).
Indeed. Your play in this instance was plausibly a manifestation of circumscribed (special) interest typical of AS, and particularly if there were elements of repetitiveness to the storylines that you scripted.
Quote:
I would do this non-stop for hours and get really involved in the story, but it always had to be some variation of Beauty and the Beast. I would sometimes do this with other kids my age if they included me and gave me clear directions for what it was that I was supposed to be pretending, but most of the time it was by myself.
The inability to script for yourself in imaginative role play, even with your interest and probable knowledge of the characteristics and elements of the Beauty and the Beast characters and gestalt is indicative of the kind of imagination impairment associated with Aspergers Syndrome. Other children you played with in these circumstances probably did not need so much guidance and could probably proceed in their roles with more vague instruction and much less detailed structure.
Quote:
Did anyone else really enjoy playing make believe when they were little?
Yes, but like you my ability to do so was compromised.
I could not get my head around playing mothers and fathers even with explicit instruction, although my peers easily intiated such play roles without need for instruction from others. I could invoke a character but could not imagine a "mind" for it, being able to easily talk like a mother (for instance) but only if I was told what the mother must communicate.
I myself obsessively enacted (in my head and with dolls or other objects for that matter) scenes from the books and movies/prorgames that I was obsessed with and would try to alter in my mind what had happened, first going over elements of the script directly from the book then trying to imagine the scene altered by my adjustments, but the game always ended here because I simply could not imagine what would happen subsequent to the change I had introduced. While I could if given a script, invoke characters I was familiar with, including enacting their idiosnycratic language use, unless someone told me what the character was to communicate, I was completely at a loss to imagine what they would say or do in response to the changed circumstances I was attempting to introduce into the "script".
I was actually very good (relative to my age peers) at ad-lib acting providing I was given an outline of my characters expected behaviours, attitudes and responses (to events in the "script"), but I was completely unable to imagine these things for myself.
Or put much more succinctly.....
penseive wrote:
It was more mimicry than imagination though.
Indeed, excellently summarized in under 8 words.