Page 1 of 4 [ 50 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

NeantHumain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jun 2004
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,837
Location: St. Louis, Missouri

15 May 2010, 11:52 am

Apparently there is still a small but vigorous group of people who deny Barack Obama was born in the United States, and so Hawaii has had to pass legislation limiting the number of birth-certificate requests any one person can make in a year. I wish I were kidding, but apparently some people are sending hundreds of requests to Hawaii's Department of Health, swamping the agency's employees with busywork. The Birthers are usually mentioned as a radical component of the Tea Party movement and as a core constituency Republicans want to appeal to for the 2010 midterm elections.

  • Their position sounds delusionally moronic, so it's hard for me to imagine they can exist in any large number.
  • Do Republicans really want to enable these people?
  • Are the Birthers pretty much just elderly cranks with nothing better to do?
  • It's been almost two years since Barack Obama was elected. Obviously their concerns are moot.



Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

15 May 2010, 1:55 pm

You're purposely overstating them. It's not a "core constituency" of anything.



pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

15 May 2010, 1:57 pm

Well, I suspect that there are very few Obama supporters among them.

Was does Fox News have to say about them?



zer0netgain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Mar 2009
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,613

15 May 2010, 2:01 pm

The debate would end overnight if Obama would just allow the release of a certified copy of his "long form" birth certificate.

That the DNC has spent over $2 million to prevent this from ever happening is why there is non-stop fuel for the fire.

There is nothing "private" about a birth certificate...certainly not where a "high profile" public figure is involved. Not a jot or tittle on Obama's original certificate has anything that could compromise his privacy...unless it documents something he doesn't want people to know about.



Fuzzy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,223
Location: Alberta Canada

15 May 2010, 2:34 pm

zer0netgain wrote:
The debate would end overnight if Obama would just allow the release of a certified copy of his "long form" birth certificate.

That the DNC has spent over $2 million to prevent this from ever happening is why there is non-stop fuel for the fire.

There is nothing "private" about a birth certificate...certainly not where a "high profile" public figure is involved. Not a jot or tittle on Obama's original certificate has anything that could compromise his privacy...unless it documents something he doesn't want people to know about.


If I were a president that objected to the rule that only a natural born US citizen could be president and there were some debate as to my origins, I would hide my birth certificate until after my term was up. At that point I would reveal the truth, hopefully making some people look like asses.

In fact, it is rather shaky grounds that he could be anything but an American as his mum is solidly a US citizen, and any child of hers is going to have US citizenship.

Rather, I think it more likely that he is listed as having dual citizenship. Not normally considered a bad thing... except in parts of the US.

Would you object to a legitimate President having dual citizenship Zer0netgain?


_________________
davidred wrote...
I installed Ubuntu once and it completely destroyed my paying relationship with Microsoft.


Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

15 May 2010, 3:23 pm

It would certainly be a conflict of interest in my opinion and I would not vote for somebody with dual citizenship. The constitution doesn't say anything about this but It's a problem I think that will have to be addressed sometime in the future especially since more and more people are holding dual citizenship. The point of having to be a natural born citizen was so the president who is also the commander-in-chief of the armed forces would have no foreign allegiance.



Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

15 May 2010, 4:35 pm

Jacoby wrote:
You're purposely overstating them. It's not a "core constituency" of anything.

Really? According to a recent Harris poll, 45% of Republicans actually are moronic enough to believe the Birther's conspiracy theories. 25% of all Americans think Obama is not a native US citizen. These people are batshit crazy, and yes, they are undoubtedly the core of the Teabagger movement.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

15 May 2010, 5:33 pm

Orwell wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
You're purposely overstating them. It's not a "core constituency" of anything.

Really? According to a recent Harris poll, 45% of Republicans actually are moronic enough to believe the Birther's conspiracy theories. 25% of all Americans think Obama is not a native US citizen. These people are batshit crazy, and yes, they are undoubtedly the core of the Teabagger movement.


Well without diving into the those numbers which I feel your misrepresenting, I take issue with the poll here. Republicans are opposed to Obama so I think they're predisposed to believe anything negative said about Obama. It's a biased question. If you asked Democrats whether they had any doubts(notice the wording)about whether Sarah Palin really gave birth to her youngest child or if Bush had anything to do with 9/11 I suspect you probably find a decent amount of "believers too. A lot people that didn't like Bill Clinton thought he murdered Vince Foster. Does that mean it's the core of their beliefs? I'm pretty sure all these folks would still oppose Obama if he had an American father and grew up in Kansas.

This is all a systematic attempt at marginalizing the tea party movement.



zer0netgain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Mar 2009
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,613

15 May 2010, 6:40 pm

Fuzzy wrote:
Would you object to a legitimate President having dual citizenship Zer0netgain?


While I'm not sure if the Constitution would back my position, I personally would not want someone with dual citizenship in any federal office.

Dual citizenship implies dual allegiances. If you wish to serve in a leadership capacity (including judicial offices) within a nation, you should have no other ties or potential allegiances. So, if you were born into dual citizenship, you should formally and effectively renounce one of them in order to fully embrace the other.

If you won't do that, you should be barred from holding public office on the federal level.



YakovHarkonnen
Butterfly
Butterfly

User avatar

Joined: 14 May 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 9

15 May 2010, 7:04 pm

Don't forget, people on the right are "bigoted rednecks" / "patriotic"

People on the left are "enlightened" / "pinko radicals"

I think I have just perfectly demonstrated the American political mind. Neither left nor right has a monopoly on the lunatics. I suggest you good people on both sides of the spectrum keep that in mind when you (mis)characterize your political opponents.



Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

16 May 2010, 1:54 pm

Of course, Jacoby, keep telling yourself that. We all know reality has a liberal bias.

Seriously, how can I be misrepresenting raw data? You tried to claim that the "birther" loons are not the mainstream of the Tea Parties. I gave you numbers that demonstrate that birther beliefs are mainstream within the rank and file of the Republican Party, and the Tea Party movement is definitely farther to the right and more into conspiracy theories than the general GOP.

As far as the poll, Harris is a well-known, established polling agency. Their methodology was sound. They found that 45% of Republicans and 25% of Americans "agreed with the Birthers that Obama was not born in the United States." They didn't ask if people had doubts. You are almost right on one thing; that is, I would definitely prefer for the Teabaggers to be marginalized. Why? Because the people in the movement are almost all delusional and misinformed in varying degrees. I really don't want national policy to be directed on the basis of grossly off-base understandings of reality.

On a side note, that was a strange equivocation in how you changed the use of the word "core" in your last post. Was that deliberately misleading, or are you just incompetent in the use of your native language?


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

16 May 2010, 1:55 pm

YakovHarkonnen wrote:
Don't forget, people on the right are "bigoted rednecks" / "patriotic"

People on the left are "enlightened" / "pinko radicals"

I think I have just perfectly demonstrated the American political mind. Neither left nor right has a monopoly on the lunatics. I suggest you good people on both sides of the spectrum keep that in mind when you (mis)characterize your political opponents.

This is entirely true. However, I think that the right tends to have a higher proportion of lunatics. The left has plenty of idiots, liars, hypocrites, etc. But the right really takes the cake for outright insanity.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

16 May 2010, 3:18 pm

Orwell wrote:
YakovHarkonnen wrote:
Don't forget, people on the right are "bigoted rednecks" / "patriotic"

People on the left are "enlightened" / "pinko radicals"

I think I have just perfectly demonstrated the American political mind. Neither left nor right has a monopoly on the lunatics. I suggest you good people on both sides of the spectrum keep that in mind when you (mis)characterize your political opponents.

This is entirely true. However, I think that the right tends to have a higher proportion of lunatics. The left has plenty of idiots, liars, hypocrites, etc. But the right really takes the cake for outright insanity.


Insanity and what is even worse, silliness and inanity. It is alright to be crazy as long as the insanity has some earthly good purpose. Asserting that Obama was the "Nigerian Candidate" is ludicrous. His mamma was never in Nigeria. She was in Hawaii during the birth of her son. In addition to which the entire principle that a person qualified to be our chief executive must have both parents natural born Americans and bleed red, white and blue is absolute non-sense. All that is required ought to be that the potential president have lived so long in this country that he has no greater loyalty to another country. If it is o.k. for Arnold Schwartzerneger, a natural born Austrian to be the governator of Kalifornia then why couldn't he run for president. I would not vote for him but I do not see him as unfit for the office.

ruveyn


ruveyn



Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

16 May 2010, 3:18 pm

This might be relevant, as sympathetic outsiders have also criticized the right for being rather problematic.

http://www.juliansanchez.com/2010/04/07 ... -distance/

Basically, Mr. Sanchez believes that the right's problem is a rapid confrontation with a world that does not agree, and thus a self-isolation of information sources away from what is normal and considered acceptable. Sort of like a conspiracy theorist's perspective.

This article goes on about all of the debate about all of this stuff.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/28/books/28conserv.html

(forgot to post the article)



Last edited by Awesomelyglorious on 16 May 2010, 3:50 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

16 May 2010, 3:26 pm

Orwell wrote:
Of course, Jacoby, keep telling yourself that. We all know reality has a liberal bias.

Seriously, how can I be misrepresenting raw data? You tried to claim that the "birther" loons are not the mainstream of the Tea Parties. I gave you numbers that demonstrate that birther beliefs are mainstream within the rank and file of the Republican Party, and the Tea Party movement is definitely farther to the right and more into conspiracy theories than the general GOP.

As far as the poll, Harris is a well-known, established polling agency. Their methodology was sound. They found that 45% of Republicans and 25% of Americans "agreed with the Birthers that Obama was not born in the United States." They didn't ask if people had doubts. You are almost right on one thing; that is, I would definitely prefer for the Teabaggers to be marginalized. Why? Because the people in the movement are almost all delusional and misinformed in varying degrees. I really don't want national policy to be directed on the basis of grossly off-base understandings of reality.

On a side note, that was a strange equivocation in how you changed the use of the word "core" in your last post. Was that deliberately misleading, or are you just incompetent in the use of your native language?


lol you got hostile quick

1, the poll was dumb straight up. Their methodology was not sound. As I said in the previous post, I'd like to see them poll democrats with similar questions like "Is Dick Cheney the antichrist?" and whatnot. It was bias from the start. 2, you're equating that people who identify themselves as republicans = tea partiers which is where I feel the misrepresentation comes in. 3, I don't see your problem with how I used "core". Do you disagree?

I don't even see how it's that crazy of a conspiracy theory honestly. It's dumb since I think there is sufficient enough proof that he was born in Hawaii but compared to other conspiracy theories like JFK was murdered by the CIA, 9/11 was a controlled demolition, or that the moon landing was faked, which are in the "mainstream" now I think it's pretty tame. It's just a distraction from the real issues.



Epilefftic
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 27 Apr 2010
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 350
Location: Long Island, NY, USA

16 May 2010, 3:36 pm

So what scares the birthers more, The supposed fact that they believe Obama is an Illegal alien or the notion that in spite of that he won the election and is now our President? I do not understand the motivation behind the movement, nor do I see how it can be productive to conservative politics.

What would happen if it WAS proven Obama was not a citizen? Wouldn't we get a President Biden and Vice President Pelosi? Would that make you happy?

Instead of wasting all this time and money with these lawsuits and making people think you are kooky, just get someone else elected. I'm sure if Obama's numbers get low enough Hilary Clinton will be circling him like a vulture.


_________________
"In the end, Darwin always wins" - Me