Page 1 of 4 [ 52 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next


Is your verbal IQ higher than your performance IQ (by 10 points or more)?
diagnosed aspie and yes VIQ>PIQ 39%  39%  [ 24 ]
suspected aspie and yes VIQ>PIQ 24%  24%  [ 15 ]
not an aspie and yes VIQ>PIQ 3%  3%  [ 2 ]
diagnosed aspie and VIQ= or < PIQ 24%  24%  [ 15 ]
suspected aspie and VIQ = or < PIQ 10%  10%  [ 6 ]
Total votes : 62

daydreamer84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jul 2009
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,001
Location: My own little world

20 Oct 2010, 12:02 am

For those of you that have had a formal IQ test like the WAIS only:

Have you been diagnosed with AS?

Is your verbal IQ 10 or more points higher than your performance IQ?

I am writing a paper comparing and contrasting AS and NVLD and I am finding very contradictory results as to whether people with AS and those with NVLD are similar in terms of their cognitive strengths and weaknesses or not.
I was curious about WP population =)



pensieve
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Nov 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,204
Location: Sydney, Australia

20 Oct 2010, 12:09 am

Diagnosed, but not properly tested for PIQ/ VIQ. I have done a verbal IQ test before and it was average but it's developed since. My performance, however, is probably less than average. It's not really an official result but more an opinion of myself.


_________________
My band photography blog - http://lostthroughthelens.wordpress.com/
My personal blog - http://helptheywantmetosocialise.wordpress.com/


buryuntime
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Dec 2008
Age: 86
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,662

20 Oct 2010, 12:12 am

My VIQ and PIQ score very even. My processing and working memory differing from the PIQ and VIQ is where the gap is.



aspi-rant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Sep 2008
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,448
Location: denmark

20 Oct 2010, 1:00 am

diagnosed aspie and PIQ > VIQ

according to the WAIS III:

PIQ = 99.8 percentile
VIQ = 85 percentile

i have a PIQ > VIQ gap of appr 30 IQ points or two SD's (standard deviations)



Apple_in_my_Eye
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,420
Location: in my brain

20 Oct 2010, 1:29 am

I put "suspected":

VIQ higher than PIQ by 35 points.

Subtest scores ranged from 5 to 18 (in whatever scaling that is).



Marsian
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jul 2009
Age: 46
Gender: Female
Posts: 302
Location: East Ldn, UK

20 Oct 2010, 5:41 am

I can't recall the exact percentage off the top of my head but my verbal IQ is in the superior range and my performance IQ is in the average range. Also my verbal memory was in the top 95% of people while my visual memory was just average which I was surprised about as I thought my visual memory was quite good apparently it's relatively unusual to have that kind of discrepancy in memory and it's common in aspergers. I don't know if anyone else found that?



sluice
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Age: 115
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,543
Location: center of universe

20 Oct 2010, 7:08 am

Same for me, I had a 40 point difference betweein VIQ and PIQ when I was about 14. It has decrease to a 12 point difference the last time I took it a couple of years ago. Annoying, isn't it. It is like knowing all the big answers, but not knowing how to do anything with it.



Marsian
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jul 2009
Age: 46
Gender: Female
Posts: 302
Location: East Ldn, UK

20 Oct 2010, 7:27 am

Sluice!

Thats EXACTLY what it is... I call it being able to talk the talk but not walk the walk!

I'm highly vocal and can shoot my mouth off about topics but if I was put in a practical situation and had to apply my so called knowledge I'd be like, errr... And then probably give up!

The most bizarre thing of all is that it doesn't only reflect in WAIS testing you can see it in my Uni grades too, I find that in exams and essays, more often than not I can get A grades but my project grades are usually lower ranging all the way from As to Es depending on the type of work.

Its really annoying especially as sometimes people can mistake being good at written work for being a genius but then when they get to know me they realise soon enough that I'm not!



Horus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,302
Location: A rock in the milky way

20 Oct 2010, 11:43 am

I've taken seven WAIS tests in my life and the discrepancy between VIQ and PIQ has always been at least 19 points. The largest gap between my scores was obtained on the most recent WAIS I took in June. My POI was 79 (borderline range) and my VCI was 136 (superior range.) That's a discrepancy of 57 points and only a tiny fraction of the population exhibits such large gaps between VIQ/VCI and PIQ/POI. It doesn't seem THAT unusual for those with AS/NVLD though. There is a poster in this group who claimed their PIQ tested in the 60's (MR range) while their VIQ was in the 160's (very superior/genius range.)

I can understand why VIQ scores can fluctuate from test-to-test, but my PIQ scores have also fluctuated greatly and i'm not entirely sure why. For instance.....my PIQ on the WAIS I took four years ago was 111 (while my VIQ was 155 on the same test....these scores yielded an FSIQ of 143) and that's in the high average range. My POI/PIQ on the most recent test was in the borderline range at 79. I can understand SOME variation in scores due to mood, tiredness, etc.....

But a 32 point discrepancy between my PIQ/POI scores in 2006 and 2010 seems quite odd. Nonetheless, I scored in the borderline range on PIQ when I was 23 and until recently, my PIQ scores have been in the average range and high average on the test in 2006.

I think alot of it has to do with processing speed. For one example.....the block design subtest on WAIS is a timed test and therefore very dependent on processing speed, particularily when it comes to visual processing of course. My processing speed scores are usually on the low side and they were also borderline on the latest test. I did score 108 on processing speed on a WAIS I had in 2001 and my PIQ score on that one was 102.

So if my PIQ score largely depends on processing speed (though i'm not sure of this either) i'm wondering what factors determine processing speed from test-to-test.



Marsian
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jul 2009
Age: 46
Gender: Female
Posts: 302
Location: East Ldn, UK

20 Oct 2010, 12:21 pm

I think it is probably anxiety or mood or tiredness or even time of day that affects the PIQ. I'd guess that my PIQ would be lower in the morning than in the evenings as I'm so groggy in the mornings, plus the more caffeine I'd drink the more focused I'd be on what I was trying to do. It would always be lower though as I find the tests for VIQ kinda stupidly easy so I guess VIQ would always be superior! I'm not convinced it's s great way of testing intelligence, it's just testing verbal memory really I reckon?



KissOfMarmaladeSky
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Aug 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 532

20 Oct 2010, 12:29 pm

daydreamer84 wrote:
For those of you that have had a formal IQ test like the WAIS only:

Have you been diagnosed with AS?

Is your verbal IQ 10 or more points higher than your performance IQ?

I am writing a paper comparing and contrasting AS and NVLD and I am finding very contradictory results as to whether people with AS and those with NVLD are similar in terms of their cognitive strengths and weaknesses or not.
I was curious about WP population =)


My PIQ is about...um...80. It is especially low in the picture recreation section, as well as the dreaded blocks test. My VIQ is about 120, but when it comes to vocabulary, it is 130 or something exageratedly similar.



daydreamer84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jul 2009
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,001
Location: My own little world

21 Oct 2010, 12:06 am

Thanks for your replies everybody.\


I am thinking that NLD and AS are not the same thing ....a lot of aspies seem to have VIQ =<PIQ....and some have exceptional spatial-visual abilities. However there was some research showing that people with AS DID have more visual-spatial difficulties than the rest of the population. How to account for those findings? I think NLD may occur more in people with AS than in the rest of the pop bcs the two disorders have similar etiology i.e. both are thought to be caused by right hemisphere dysfunction and white matter abnormalities. Does anyone have any thoughts about this? Does anybody know this to be UNTRUE? If so please let me know

I apologise for any bad spelling/grammar.....it is late at night. or more accurately early in the morning (here in Canada anyways)...and I am very very tired.



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

21 Oct 2010, 12:18 am

My PIQ is higher than my VIQ. I was diagnosed PDD-NOS at the age of 5 and Aspergers more recently. But if you want to go with the paradigm that AS and HFA are different I'm probably closer to HFA, though it's a mild case in either case.



daydreamer84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jul 2009
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,001
Location: My own little world

21 Oct 2010, 12:27 am

Horus wrote:
I've taken seven WAIS tests in my life and the discrepancy between VIQ and PIQ has always been at least 19 points. The largest gap between my scores was obtained on the most recent WAIS I took in June. My POI was 79 (borderline range) and my VCI was 136 (superior range.) That's a discrepancy of 57 points and only a tiny fraction of the population exhibits such large gaps between VIQ/VCI and PIQ/POI. It doesn't seem THAT unusual for those with AS/NVLD though. There is a poster in this group who claimed their PIQ tested in the 60's (MR range) while their VIQ was in the 160's (very superior/genius range.)

I can understand why VIQ scores can fluctuate from test-to-test, but my PIQ scores have also fluctuated greatly and i'm not entirely sure why. For instance.....my PIQ on the WAIS I took four years ago was 111 (while my VIQ was 155 on the same test....these scores yielded an FSIQ of 143) and that's in the high average range. My POI/PIQ on the most recent test was in the borderline range at 79. I can understand SOME variation in scores due to mood, tiredness, etc.....

But a 32 point discrepancy between my PIQ/POI scores in 2006 and 2010 seems quite odd. Nonetheless, I scored in the borderline range on PIQ when I was 23 and until recently, my PIQ scores have been in the average range and high average on the test in 2006.

I think alot of it has to do with processing speed. For one example.....the block design subtest on WAIS is a timed test and therefore very dependent on processing speed, particularily when it comes to visual processing of course. My processing speed scores are usually on the low side and they were also borderline on the latest test. I did score 108 on processing speed on a WAIS I had in 2001 and my PIQ score on that one was 102.

So if my PIQ score largely depends on processing speed (though i'm not sure of this either) i'm wondering what factors determine processing speed from test-to-test.



I know a lot of aspies have IQs that fluctuate...even though IQ is not supposed to fluctuate. I am really sure what would cause your PIQ to fluctuate that much....or why IQ fluctuates so much for a lot of aspies. I don't know a lot a lot about IQ testing and I don't know how processing speed does or doesn't affect the outcome of the different sub-tests of an IQ test. All this would be interesting to investigate.

My IQ has always fluctuated a lot as well. The discrepancy between my PIQ and VIQ was highest when I was a kid. My VIQ was originally in the genius range and then went down to above average range but not superior (between 115-130) and my PIQ went from borderline to low end of average range...so my IQ evened out over time. ..but I still have a pretty big discrepancy between sub-tests. When I had this assessment done I had just come out of an episode of major depression and was still a bit depressed....I needed a new assessment for the purpose of starting university. I actually refused to do a few of the subtests that I thought would be hard (as an adult). I was not in the right frame of mind then I very much want to be re-assessed....but have no money to do so.



daydreamer84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jul 2009
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,001
Location: My own little world

21 Oct 2010, 7:54 am

pensieve wrote:
Diagnosed, but not properly tested for PIQ/ VIQ. I have done a verbal IQ test before and it was average but it's developed since. My performance, however, is probably less than average. It's not really an official result but more an opinion of myself.




You did a verbal IQ sub-test without the performance sub-test...formally? That’s really interesting…. I didn't know you could do that.



sluice
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Age: 115
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,543
Location: center of universe

21 Oct 2010, 8:55 am

Marsian wrote:
Sluice!

Thats EXACTLY what it is... I call it being able to talk the talk but not walk the walk!

I'm highly vocal and can shoot my mouth off about topics but if I was put in a practical situation and had to apply my so called knowledge I'd be like, errr... And then probably give up!

The most bizarre thing of all is that it doesn't only reflect in WAIS testing you can see it in my Uni grades too, I find that in exams and essays, more often than not I can get A grades but my project grades are usually lower ranging all the way from As to Es depending on the type of work.

Its really annoying especially as sometimes people can mistake being good at written work for being a genius but then when they get to know me they realise soon enough that I'm not!


Your post makes me laugh because it is so true. I was purported to be a genius by some of my classmates and even some of the faculty in college. All I know is it doesn't take a whole lot to be called one these days. I usually did ace most of the tests, but everyone took that to mean that I already knew how to do everything without being shown in labs and in research projects, which actually is probably somewhat of a weakness with me. I would actually say that doing well in the classroom was detrimental to learning for me. If I was an average student I would probably have received more help at a more deliberate teaching pace, especially since I don't think I process auditory instructions well. That is life I suppose.