Henbane wrote:
I've never seen the word 'ret*d' used as much as I have on this site. Is it an accepted word to describe disability in the USA and Canada? I realise a lot of the way we use language in the UK is overly politically correct, but every time I see it on here it makes me cringe.
Who cares? The word is adequate to describe some conditions (it turns up in medical dictionaries, the word literally means "slow/ed"). Any bad connotations on the word are inherited from usage. First idiot, then moron, ret*d, handicapped, special needs, special, a constant language change to try avoid the word turning into an insult. But, if they ever read Shakespeare they would know "a rose by any other name..."
_________________
The scientist only imposes two things, namely truth and sincerity, imposes them upon himself and upon other scientists - Erwin Schrodinger
Member of the WP Strident Atheists