For some lulz...

Page 1 of 3 [ 39 posts ] Go to page 1, 2, 3 Next

Joined: 27 Dec 2009
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,201

19 Jun 2011, 5:26 pm

http://delusiondamage.com/2011/06/16/th ... ing-scale/

The thing to remember though is that you are never as ugly as you think...

MollyTroubletail
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 21 Oct 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,185
Location: Canada

19 Jun 2011, 6:06 pm

I'm not sure how funny that is. I can't tell the difference between the girls rated 3 to 10. They all look equally pretty. And the girls rated 1 and 2 are simply overweight. The point seems to be that fat girls are ugly, which isn't really that funny or original.

zen_mistress
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Age: 47
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,033

19 Jun 2011, 6:43 pm

I would like to create a similar scale, putting the Shallow Hals at 1 and putting the quality men at 10.

BTW I thought the 3s, the 4s and the 5s were most attractive. The ones rated over 7 looked like cardboard cutouts.

_________________
"Caravan is the name of my history, and my life an extraordinary adventure."
~ Amin Maalouf

Taking a break.

Erisad
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Jul 2010
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,058
Location: United States

19 Jun 2011, 7:52 pm

Disgusting chauvanistic BS like this makes me wish that I was into girls. And then men try to come back with, "No, we don't care about looks, honest!"

Look, fat girls have it tough enough as it is. Can't you guys just cut us a f*****g break?

OneStepBeyond
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,310

19 Jun 2011, 7:55 pm

that was pretty unlully

im disappointed in you ricky

RICKY5
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 27 Dec 2009
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,201

19 Jun 2011, 7:59 pm

OneStepBeyond wrote:

that was pretty unlully

im disappointed in you ricky

Lulz are different from lol

MXH
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 28 Jul 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,057
Location: Here i stand and face the rain

19 Jun 2011, 7:59 pm

I prefer the 0-1 scale in terms of looks. 0 is wont bang, 1 is would bang.

MCalavera
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 15 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,442

19 Jun 2011, 8:02 pm

5-10 are all equally delicious to me.

For food, that is.

RICKY5
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 27 Dec 2009
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,201

19 Jun 2011, 8:03 pm

zen_mistress wrote:

The men's scale would be fun.

zen_mistress
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Age: 47
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,033

19 Jun 2011, 8:03 pm

MXH wrote:

I prefer the 0-1 scale in terms of looks. 0 is wont bang, 1 is would bang.

That sounds rather binary. : )

_________________
"Caravan is the name of my history, and my life an extraordinary adventure."
~ Amin Maalouf

Taking a break.

zen_mistress
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Age: 47
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,033

19 Jun 2011, 8:05 pm

RICKY5 wrote:

zen_mistress wrote:

The men's scale would be fun.

It would be. It would be harder to find photos though.

_________________
"Caravan is the name of my history, and my life an extraordinary adventure."
~ Amin Maalouf

Taking a break.

GoatOnFire
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 22 Feb 2007
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,986
Location: Den of the ecdysiasts

19 Jun 2011, 8:17 pm

RICKY5 wrote:

The men's scale would be fun.

Might be rather disappointing to most guys, actually. I remember a study where they had men grade women on a scale and then women grade men on a scale of physical attractiveness.

The men's scale grading the women was pretty evenly distributed.

But when the women graded the men... well, 80% of guys were graded as below average. Harsh.

_________________
I will befriend the friendless, help the helpless, and defeat... the feetless?

MXH
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 28 Jul 2010
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,057
Location: Here i stand and face the rain

19 Jun 2011, 8:22 pm

zen_mistress wrote:

RICKY5 wrote:

zen_mistress wrote:

The men's scale would be fun.

It would be. It would be harder to find photos though.

ill supply one for a 10 :wink:

hyperlexian
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Age: 52
Gender: Female
Posts: 22,023
Location: with bucephalus

19 Jun 2011, 9:21 pm

personally, i'd sure like to see a picture of RICKY5. i suspect that someone who finds it funny to judge others' appearance would not stand up under such scrutiny himself.

_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105

Erisad
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Jul 2010
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,058
Location: United States

19 Jun 2011, 9:40 pm

GoatOnFire wrote:

RICKY5 wrote:

The men's scale would be fun.

Sucks being evaluated solely on looks doesn't it? You would think that would make guys stop grading women as if we were cuts of meat but I see it probably didn't do much. :/

Yeah RICKY5, what do you look like? You judge people on their looks all the time, so it's only fair if we get a shot at you. :twisted:

cdfox7
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 31 Mar 2011
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,700

19 Jun 2011, 10:09 pm

RICKY5 wrote:

The men's scale would be fun.

mmm...my option of that its the same as Patrick McGoohan's
I am not a number, I am a free man

Edit: That quote also applies to women has well, so lets cut the crap here give stop giving numbers to rate physical attractiveness!!

Last edited by cdfox7 on 19 Jun 2011, 11:33 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Page 1 of 3 [ 39 posts ] Go to page 1, 2, 3 Next

Jump to:

For some lulz... Post Reply New Topic

For some lulz...