lae wrote:
I had not read about it. That's really cool. I had always interpreted it on a very simple level, and this makes it much more interesting. Interesting thoughts from Donkey, too.
An ancient debate!
Should a piece of artwork be understood for what it is, and the reactions it provokes,
Or is information about it's background, context and the artist's intentions and understanding also important? If the former, ignorant responses are as valid as informed ones, and if the former, sufficient captions in words would make vast inroads into the need for the piece of art: just read the essay!
I really like Turner's "The Fighting Temeraire", but my thoughts and feelings are enhanced by knowing certain facts and details about it which are not present on the canvas itself.