Jory wrote:
Philologos wrote:
Jory wrote:
Don't go comparing the Bible, the Torah and the Qur'an to Harry Potter, The Lord of the Rings, and A Tale of Two Cities. The latter books actually make a little sense.
You obviously have not tried reading any ancient literature. Instead of commenting purely based on rumor, you might try it.
I've read all three, but thanks for making assumptions anyway.
Sorry - thought your "no sense in Bible and Qur'an" had to indicate a lack of familiarity with the texts.
But if you have in fact perused them, then we have to move to a three-headed hypothesis set:
A. You are not up for reading material other than narrative
B. You find the genre mix in the JusaeoChristian library and the somewhat randomly ordered [I think some editions "fix" the order, though] and occasional prophetic / didactic structure of the Qur'an an obstace to finding a "point" for the whole - not surprising, because there is no such direction.
C. You were speaking dacetiously to make a polemic point rather than trying to participate in discussion.