Bloviater wrote:
#6
Explain to me how a "terrorist", who, incidentally, learned to fly on a simulator, could aim a giant passenger jet , with impeccable accuracy, so even and low to the ground, into the side of the Pentagon. Explain how several folks heard explosions near the basement of the towers after the planes hit the towers. Explain why the towers fell exactly like how buildings destroyed by controlled demolitions fall. Explain why the government refuses to release data and videos that would show how infallible the official story is. Explain why the 9/11 commission left out very important details in its dossier. Explain why the passports of the "terrorists" were found in tact yet the black boxes of all the flights were either not found or were confiscated by the FBI. Explain to me how, when you look at the crash in Pennsylvania, how there was little to no debris and no bodies. Explain to me why building seven is never mentioned and why it's destruction bears eerie similarities to a controlled demolition. Explain why Larry Silverstein obtained insurance policies for buildings 1, 2, 4 and 5 worth 3.55 billion dollars on July 2001.
There are many coincidences and inconsistencies with the official story.
Ummm... they didn't fall in a way that was anything close to looking like a controlled demolition. Of course some idiots are going to make the comparison to a controlled demolition because lets face it - when else has anyone ever witnessed a large skyscraper falling on it's own? Not including 9/11?
WTC 7 was the only building that even remotely looked like a controlled demolition, and that only from a specific angle. The problem is there are less views of the south side of WTC 7 where the outer facade of WTC 1 had pushed into and hollowed out half the base of the structure.