Page 1 of 1 [ 14 posts ] 

hale_bopp
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2004
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,054
Location: None

02 Nov 2011, 7:01 am

Now a lot of men here brandish a lot of women as "gold diggers". She pays him with sex and company to get what she wants.

Is the man not "gold digging" for a woman who is out of his league? He pays her with gifts and money to get what he wants.

What the hell is the problem?

If this is not the case, is any man really SO stupid to not be able to see that someone is using him for his money? The answer is probably yes at times when the women is very good at her game.

But how common is that? I mean REALLY?



minervx
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Apr 2011
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,155
Location: United States

02 Nov 2011, 7:08 am

This is clearly an implied response to the thread I created, so let me clarify a few things, so I do not get misrepresented.

1) I believe nobody is entitled to anything from another person. A guy is not entitled to love or sex from a woman for being nice alone. In order to get, you must give, so jewelry for sex is an even trade.

2) If a guy is being used for money, then it is his fault. Nobody forces him to shower her with gifts, it is usually the guy that opens up this window of giftgiving, and its difficult to expect the other person to not accept hundreds of dollars worth of gifts.

3) Since this is clearly directed at me, my post WAS NOT a diatribe on how women used men. Whatever the woman did in that case was fair game. It was a thread intended to discuss how men can empower themselves with good qualities to avoid a situation where they can only hold a woman's interest with money,

I hope you understand, Hale.



hale_bopp
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2004
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,054
Location: None

02 Nov 2011, 7:19 am

It wasn't, it was supposed to be a fresh thread unrelated to anything you've said.

You do have a good point with 2) though.



Grisha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Oct 2009
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,336
Location: LA-ish

02 Nov 2011, 7:30 am

In all fairness, the guys who accomodate "gold-diggers" should be labeled themselves as "sex-diggers". It's all OK with me assuming that the terms of the "relationship" are all above-board and no deception is involved.

I really have no idea how common this is, maybe it seems more common to me because I live in a relatively affluent area, and such women tend to be very aggressive "romantically".

My only problem with them is trying to spot them early before any damage is done, I think Aspies are particularly vulnerable in this respect.



hale_bopp
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2004
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,054
Location: None

02 Nov 2011, 7:36 am

Grisha wrote:
In all fairness, the guys who accomodate "gold-diggers" should be labeled themselves as "sex-diggers". It's all OK with me assuming that the terms of the "relationship" are all above-board and no deception is involved.

I really have no idea how common this is, maybe it seems more common to me because I live in a relatively affluent area, and such women tend to be very aggressive "romantically".

My only problem with them is trying to spot them early before any damage is done, I think Aspies are particularly vulnerable in this respect.


I was wondering about your first wife. She seems like one of the manipulative and very deceiving gold diggers.



Grisha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Oct 2009
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,336
Location: LA-ish

02 Nov 2011, 7:46 am

hale_bopp wrote:
Grisha wrote:
In all fairness, the guys who accomodate "gold-diggers" should be labeled themselves as "sex-diggers". It's all OK with me assuming that the terms of the "relationship" are all above-board and no deception is involved.

I really have no idea how common this is, maybe it seems more common to me because I live in a relatively affluent area, and such women tend to be very aggressive "romantically".

My only problem with them is trying to spot them early before any damage is done, I think Aspies are particularly vulnerable in this respect.


I was wondering about your first wife. She seems like one of the manipulative and very deceiving gold diggers.


Yes, but in retrospect I was pretty willing to be deceived myself - I can't honestly regard myself to be a completely innocent "victim".



HopefulRomantic
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 11 Aug 2010
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 399
Location: Atlanta, GA

02 Nov 2011, 7:57 am

Grisha wrote:
In all fairness, the guys who accomodate "gold-diggers" should be labeled themselves as "sex-diggers". It's all OK with me assuming that the terms of the "relationship" are all above-board and no deception is involved.

I really have no idea how common this is, maybe it seems more common to me because I live in a relatively affluent area, and such women tend to be very aggressive "romantically".

My only problem with them is trying to spot them early before any damage is done, I think Aspies are particularly vulnerable in this respect.



Grisha,

I like your term "sex-digger" for the male equivalent of a female "gold-digger." End of the day, it appears to be a fair trade if both parties are honest about their respective roles in such a liaison.

It is not my chosen paradigm but to each their own!



Anke
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 20 Apr 2010
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 50
Location: United Kingdom

02 Nov 2011, 8:15 am

A few quick points, from a woman's point of view.

I'm glad you are having this discussion and some of the points sound very sensible.

Now get this.

Women like me who were raised to see themselves as equal partners look at the 'golddiggers' who we used to despise. Now they have big houses, even if they're divorced, and a comfortable life. While us independent types, after our marriages failed, have nothing to fall back on, because we weren't interested in money. Hell, when I was married, it was most often me who paid the rent WHILE also doing all the childcare.

No, you know what? If I could start again, I'd learn how to be a golddigger, because having financial security and a boring guy sure beats interesting conversation in the long run.

No, I wouldn't really. It goes too far against my nature. But: Anyone tries to date me now and can't be bothered to pay for the taxi back from the restaurant has failed a major test.


_________________
Go for it.


aspi-rant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Sep 2008
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,448
Location: denmark

02 Nov 2011, 8:26 am

minervx wrote:
so jewelry for sex is an even trade.


8O

to my knowledge jewelry is not a part of my anatomy and the only way i can provide this to a potential sexpartner is by hard and extensive labor… which is not always particular enjoyable.

having sex on the other hand involves nothing more than just being there…………… and if it isn't enjoyable…. enduring it for the time it lasts.


how is this an even trade? :?



minervx
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Apr 2011
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,155
Location: United States

02 Nov 2011, 8:27 am

because you assume she enjoys having a sex with a guy who she isn't attracted to.



mv
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2010
Age: 57
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,131

02 Nov 2011, 8:29 am

Anke wrote:
A few quick points, from a woman's point of view.

I'm glad you are having this discussion and some of the points sound very sensible.

Now get this.

Women like me who were raised to see themselves as equal partners look at the 'golddiggers' who we used to despise. Now they have big houses, even if they're divorced, and a comfortable life. While us independent types, after our marriages failed, have nothing to fall back on, because we weren't interested in money. Hell, when I was married, it was most often me who paid the rent WHILE also doing all the childcare.

No, you know what? If I could start again, I'd learn how to be a golddigger, because having financial security and a boring guy sure beats interesting conversation in the long run.

No, I wouldn't really. It goes too far against my nature. But: Anyone tries to date me now and can't be bothered to pay for the taxi back from the restaurant has failed a major test.


Ha ha ha ha, Anke. You're me. :wink: I simply don't understand how the golddiggers learn to do what they do, nor do I understand how they sleep at night. (yes, I know the punchline is, "on a big pile of money")

I don't get how anyone equates "my company" with a pricetag. How is anyone audacious enough to say, "you owe me this"? It's completely foreign to my way of thinking, but I go way out of my way to never be dependent on other people.



aspi-rant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Sep 2008
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,448
Location: denmark

02 Nov 2011, 8:34 am

hale_bopp wrote:
a woman who is out of his league


and this woman does not pick a man who is out of her league in terms of the ability to create wealth and having a professional career, education and knowledge?

odd. very odd.



aspi-rant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Sep 2008
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,448
Location: denmark

02 Nov 2011, 8:40 am

minervx wrote:
because you assume she enjoys having a sex with a guy who she isn't attracted to.


no i don't… that's why i stated what i did… ;-)

but do you think it is enjoyable to earn a lot of money to be able to buy sex with someone who does not enjoy it? 8O



minervx
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Apr 2011
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,155
Location: United States

02 Nov 2011, 8:48 am

aspi-rant wrote:
minervx wrote:
because you assume she enjoys having a sex with a guy who she isn't attracted to.


no i don't… that's why i stated what i did… ;-)

but do you think it is enjoyable to earn a lot of money to be able to buy sex with someone who does not enjoy it? 8O


supply and demand.

if you don't want it, you dont have to do it.

but like every commodity, people are willing to do it.