KimJ wrote:
The fact that Electronic's post is a bit vague (what exactly is the habit/obsession?) doesn't change the fact that greyhelium's reply is "reverse discrimination". Electronic is asking a question, she may not be right in her language, but it's not fair to call her "ret*d".
If you don't get something that NT's all understand, is it okay to call you "ret*d"?
It reads to me, that her son's obsession seems to be "annoying others". Which is probably a misinterpretation of what her son is actually trying to do. One of the deficits of autistics is being able to read nonverbal language. So, an autistic child that is social may become very interested in people's expressions. NT toddlers do it for a while, until they memorize their meanings. But subtle facial cues aren't as easy to read for autistics. So, the child may not be trying to "annoy" someone but trying to study a grimace, or voice pitch, tone, the meanings of volume.
I certainly wouldn't "stop" the behavior, but perhaps create a special time where you concentrate on it. Like a special session for voice tone, arguing, joking, affection.
the difference is, when i dont get something an NT does, i dont accuse them of deliberately trying to annoy me. in that way that particular opinion is ridiculous, whether in the context of AS or NT or whatever
/pwnt
_________________
the above post is spam