auntblabby wrote:
^^^it was not my intention to offend you, rabryst- why did you not indicate your displeasure by clicking "HUMBUG!" on the poll? at the same time, i resent your mean-spirited attempt to censor my question.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b03db/b03db2d9c9ab201a1a1fb971ddf4a0588bbdb302" alt="Mad :x"
You know nothing of my spirit. I resent that you made a poll with a gross generalisation. The article itself makes it quite clear that it is stereotypical, and based on a very small selection.
I don't want to censor the discussion. It has some merit, and is based on an article. But the way the poll question was written, is what offends me.
More people have answered your poll (at this stage) for scientific evidence pointing to a different "accent", which just set the gay rights movement back forty years.
Look, I know we're all on the spectrum here, and this whole website is a healthy way to discuss different points of view. I have expressed mine. You have expressed yours. They differ. Now we fix it, by changing our respective points of view.
The question can stay if the wording is changed. I cannot allow it to stand in its current form.
As for why I didn't vote: I have now, but originally I was too shocked to vote. My original thinking was to avoid the poll altogether, since I feel so strongly about it.
We want the world to stop perpetuating stereotypes about autism, AS, and other spectrum-related behaviour, but we can't even begin to expect that if we ourselves perpetuate stereotypes.
_________________
If you break a crumb in half, you have two crumbs - George Carlin