Scum wrote:
Despite the fact that I identify strongly with almost every other aspect associated with the very high functioning end of autism, there's always one or two "major" criteria which seem to disqualify me.
Such as the lack of imaginative play as a child. I was the opposite of this, actually. All I ever did was "pretend", whether it was reinacting a scene from a movie, taking on the persona of a certain character and reciting their lines, pretending to be a dinosaur and attacking people, playing with toys (though I was bossy), and even standing up on a table and reciting incoherent, made-up stories to my parents. Most of my play throughout elementary school was centered solely around my special interests, for example- I'd pretend to be a dinosaur, only want to play with dinosaur toys, only draw dinosaurs, etc. I would not want to play if I could not somehow incorporate what I was interested in. I was known by my family and teachers for being artistically gifted and for having a "huge" or "overactive" imagination, and that was definitely true.
But even though my "special interests" always had to be involved, does the fact that I played very imaginatively with other kids (perhaps more imaginatively and intensely than other kids, to the point that I annoyed them, especially other girls, since I was not interested in "girly" things at all) disqualify me from being on the autism spectrum?
They mean playing "House" with other children. No, actually from your description I think you fit the criteria very well. I was very similar; I would play pretend if it had to do with Pokemon or Yugiyoh or animals, but not if it was "house."