Some Number Line Intuition Needed
Ok, we have a simple number line, ranging from 0 to, say, 3 (for simplicity's sake).
so we have:
0 - 1 - 2 - 3
as our number line.
Let's say we want to find out, using the number line, what 3 - 1 is.
How does the number line show that the answer must be two? What does it mean to subtract 1 from 3 via a number line?
If I were to remove a unit of 1 from the number line above starting from the far right, what range would I be removing exactly? [2,3] or (2,3] or [2,3) or (2,3)? [ or ] indicating inclusivity and ( or ) indicating exclusivity
I hope this makes sense of what I'm trying to figure out.
I never thought of it as taking anything away from the number line. The way I think of it is that if you want to add x to a number, you move x number of places right, and if you want to subtract x from a number, you move x number of places left.
_________________
Music Theory 101: Cadences.
Authentic cadence: V-I
Plagal cadence: IV-I
Deceptive cadence: V- ANYTHING BUT I ! !! !
Beethoven cadence: V-I-V-I-V-V-V-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I
-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I! I! I! I I I
True. That's the mechanical way of figuring it out. But why does it work exactly? Is it simply a matter of it being consistent with "other methods of addition and subtraction" or is there some proof that this works?
The number line is not the definition of the operation. It doesn't show that the operation itself is correct. It's just a notional way to think of numbers in a sequence.
On a number line, + = move right and - = move left.
3 move left 1 = 2
3 move right 1 = 4
etc. Works for a number line with whole numbers.
The "proof" that this works is simply the application of the definition in this case. That's not unusual in basic cases like this.
Ok, we're getting to what I'm trying to get at.
What about when it comes to distances between two points on the number line?
We know the distance between 2 and 3 on the number line is 1 because, mechanically, 3 - 2 = 1.
But how do we know intuitively that the distance is 1 and not slightly less than or more than 1?
so we have:
0 - 1 - 2 - 3
as our number line.
Let's say we want to find out, using the number line, what 3 - 1 is.
How does the number line show that the answer must be two? What does it mean to subtract 1 from 3 via a number line?
If I were to remove a unit of 1 from the number line above starting from the far right, what range would I be removing exactly? [2,3] or (2,3] or [2,3) or (2,3)? [ or ] indicating inclusivity and ( or ) indicating exclusivity
I hope this makes sense of what I'm trying to figure out.
When you are at 3 and take one step backward that puts you at 2.
Do not confuse the point -1 which is one step to the left of 0, with the operator -1 which means take one step backward (backward means leftward here). Backward is a direction with a magnitude. Each number is just a magnitude. Think of the difference between a scalar and a vector.
ruveyn
Last edited by ruveyn on 31 Dec 2012, 3:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
What about when it comes to distances between two points on the number line?
We know the distance between 2 and 3 on the number line is 1 because, mechanically, 3 - 2 = 1.
But how do we know intuitively that the distance is 1 and not slightly less than or more than 1?
How exactly we know intuitively that the distance between 2 and 3 is exactly 1, I'm not sure. It's akin to asking how we know that 1+2=3--not a little less or a little more than 3, but 3.
Rephrasing the equation to 2+1=3, you can think about it in terms of simple, concrete distances. Let's say you live 2 miles from Zeroville, and your friend lives 3 miles from Zeroville. In fact, these distances are remarkably exact--from where you are standing inside your house, you are exactly 2 miles from the central point of Zeroville, and the same goes for your friend (with 3 miles of course). Saying that 2+1=3+[an infinitesimal amount] (and conversely that 3-2 = 1-[some infinitesimal amount]) is like saying that in calculating the distance from you to your friend, you do not count the distance from wherever you are standing in your house right now to the front door. Yes, for practical purposes it's irrelevant but it doesn't make sense.
Not a perfect analogy but I hope it helps, and I think it illustrates the way we think about the number line with at least a bit of accuracy. Of course, everything in this post could be entirely wrong, but maybe not. I'm not sure. If any of you wiser folk think you can correct me on something feel free to do so.
_________________
Feel free to PM me. I don't bite!
Again, by definition. This number line stuff only works with whole numbers. You can only go from one discrete whole number to another. If you introduce real numbers, you can no longer move in discrete units, since between any two real numbers are infinite more real numbers. You could have rational numbers, but they're really just whole numbers being scaled, so you could easily make them whole numbers by setting the unit from 1 to whatever your smallest fraction is. (We're saying the unit = 1 with the whole number line, but you could say unit = 1/32 or something.)
If you really want to use real numbers, you could also define + and - using floor and ceiling functions to make sure you stopped at a whole number boundary.
+ = move right ceiling(one_unit)
- = move left floor(one_unit)
This is actually a cool question, OP, and one that makes me think I'm right to be in here. I've had the same confusion myself. Obviously I know basic math, but I had trouble visualizing it for a long time. Why is 300 - 200 = 100 rather than 99 or 101? It almost seems like you could set up the numbering system to produce any of those answers, and long practice in computer science with zero-based vs one-based arrays didn't help.
What did help, I think, was to view the numbers as something like an english ruler, with markings at every inch. But move the markings mentally so that they actually go in the center of each inch. So "1 inch" isn't a hash mark, but rather the entirety of the first inch-long section, ending at the hash mark.
So if you pull out "inch 2", you aren't removing a hash mark, you're removing an entire inch-long section and either leaving a blank in its place, or moving the following sections back by one to fill in the space.
I appreciate that this is an absolutely stupid way to look at things, and totally unnecessary, and yet somehow it does make more sense than thinking of the hash marks themselves as the units. Partly because 0 has a hash mark but no inch! 0 really doesn't have a hash mark, that mark is really just the beginning of the first inch, so it shouldn't be labelled 0 at all.
If anything were to make me think I was really on the autism spectrum, this post would be it.
_________________
http://www.cracked.com/blog/6-harsh-tru ... er-person/
http://www.wimp.com/speakconviction/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFzXaFbxDcM
What did help, I think, was to view the numbers as something like an english ruler, with markings at every inch. But move the markings mentally so that they actually go in the center of each inch. So "1 inch" isn't a hash mark, but rather the entirety of the first inch-long section, ending at the hash mark.
So if you pull out "inch 2", you aren't removing a hash mark, you're removing an entire inch-long section and either leaving a blank in its place, or moving the following sections back by one to fill in the space.
I appreciate that this is an absolutely stupid way to look at things, and totally unnecessary, and yet somehow it does make more sense than thinking of the hash marks themselves as the units. Partly because 0 has a hash mark but no inch! 0 really doesn't have a hash mark, that mark is really just the beginning of the first inch, so it shouldn't be labelled 0 at all.
If anything were to make me think I was really on the autism spectrum, this post would be it.
I think you understand the confusion that I speak of, so that's a relief.
Your method still didn't help me, but I have now managed to figure out what to ask exactly.
So to the other posters, this is what I'm inquiring about:
Say, on a number line, we have units 0 - 5 as follows:
0-1-2-3-4-5
Let's say I want to understand why calculating 5 - 4 = 1 works when finding the distance between 4 and 5 on the number line.
So I imagine that I'm removing 4 unit spaces from the number line (specifically from 0 - 4) so that I'm supposed to be left with a unit space of 1.
But if the number 4 was removed in my imagination, then what should be left seems to be less than a unit space of 1. Or is it still a whole one unit space that's left?
This is what I'm trying to figure out.
Cool.
The numbers in your example just identify the hyphens to their left. So removing four hyphens would leave you the hyphen between "4" and "5".
Like I said, my confusion arises because we label them wrong. The labels should be over or in the associated unit, not at the end of it.
So, rather than your example, try this:
12345
-----
Pull out four, and you're left with
5
-
Which is really just 1 unit.
Much clearer that way than being left with "4-5".
Or something. Heh.
_________________
http://www.cracked.com/blog/6-harsh-tru ... er-person/
http://www.wimp.com/speakconviction/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFzXaFbxDcM